

Moderator: S2k Moderators
StormTracker wrote:Ok, I have to do it: Is SFL in the clear???
jhpigott wrote:GDFL has had some issues with a right bias . . . what's your take on the HWRF model?
hwrf has been far too aggressive with intensity this year
definetly seen that - had Ike landfalling on Cuba at 903mb at one point . . . but what about track-wise. It's the eastern most outlier at present
jhpigott wrote:I think that we're forgetting that the GFDL has a rightward bias--it was out to sea with Ike... For Gustav, half the time, it was aiming at Mobile... When you average the Euro and GFDL you get a really good track though. And for right now, that average is at SE Texas/SW Louisiana. We'll see how it changes.
Portastorm wrote:HouTXmetro wrote:These models generally shift East at night. I expect them to move more western and start to ultimately target Upper TX or SW Louisiana. And yes, I'm an unabashed EURO Hugger.
I'm with you on this ... the Euro seems to lead the way on trends. It, along with the UKMet, were showing CGOM/WGOM before the others. Also note in the main Ike thread that Wxman57 posted some early but reliable 12z runs which also suggest "west is best." The pro mets have told us time and time again that the 0z and 12z runs of models are what we should be paying attention to ... so why people get wrapped around the axle on 6z and 18z runs are beyond me.![]()
And before anyone thinks "hey Portastorm, you're just hanging on model runs that show Texas (i.e. -removed-)" ... I'm still thinking Ike hits east of us, like Louisiana/Mississippi.
gtalum wrote:StormTracker wrote:Ok, I have to do it: Is SFL in the clear???
The entire FL peninsula is in the clear. We're not even in the 5 day cone.
This is now a Panhandle to Texas threat.
gtalum wrote:StormTracker wrote:Ok, I have to do it: Is SFL in the clear???
The entire FL peninsula is in the clear. We're not even in the 5 day cone.
This is now a Panhandle to Texas threat.
StormTracker wrote:Ok, I have to do it: Is SFL in the clear???
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200809_climo.html#a_topad
stormhorn wrote:I guess people tend to hollar -removed- at the Texans because if it's even remotely coming towards Texas.....IT'S THEM ONLY!! If anyone says anything other than Texas than you're going to hear about it! I guess, the phrase "Don't Mess With Texas!" is true.
jhpigott wrote:ROCK wrote:caneman wrote:And remember folks. GDL and HWRF have the NOAA info in them sl landfall NOLA and east looks most likely. As I said before, EURO has been trash so far this year. Really saw the EUro huggers come out last night. You know who you are.
huh? trash.....6 runs in a row showing a more western solution and its trash......please...and yes I know who I am......
speaking of 6 runs in a row . . . recall what the EURO did with Hanna . . . literally blew up SEFLA for at least 6 runs in a row . . . it's had a little left bias the past couple storms
ROCK wrote:caneman wrote:And remember folks. GDL and HWRF have the NOAA info in them sl landfall NOLA and east looks most likely. As I said before, EURO has been trash so far this year. Really saw the EUro huggers come out last night. You know who you are.
huh? trash.....6 runs in a row showing a more western solution and its trash......please...and yes I know who I am......
Stratosphere747 wrote:*Long range always subject to significant changes*
Latest track does adjust a bit to the N, but still shows a heading that implies a Texas/La. threat.
Great disco that covers the G-IV data and the soundings from around the Gulf that the locals are doing.
Stratosphere747 wrote:*Long range always subject to significant changes*
Latest track does adjust a bit to the N, but still shows a heading that implies a Texas/La. threat.
Great disco that covers the G-IV data and the soundings from around the Gulf that the locals are doing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests