ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
bayoubebe
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: NOLA

#5281 Postby bayoubebe » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:36 am

When would evacuations begin?
I'm not settled back in yet from Gustav, as I"m sure many of you are not. sigh
Texans and anyone else who may be getting this storm, START EARLY WITH PREPARATIONS, it helps sooo much. Those who left 1 day after me had hell with traffic, supplies, etc.
0 likes   

N2Storms
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:37 pm
Location: Panama City, Florida

Re:

#5282 Postby N2Storms » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:37 am

[quote="BigB0882"]What does this further south movement mean for its track? I am thinking two scenarios. The first is that it shifts landfall further west. That seems obvious but then I got to thinking. Does this also delay landfall and by how much? Does that give the trough more time to come down and pick this thing up? I've read where the trough isn't expected to have an impact on Ike until AFTER landfall but that's assuming this makes landfall when planned.[/quote]


Well, by this weekend the High is progg'd to start breaking down and Ike would lose alot of his steering mechanism...I think this is kind of what the GFS has been saying but per the NHC they are completely disregarding that...you still have to go w / the NHC right now and as everything seems to be trending wwd it's not looking too good for the folks in the Hou / Gal area IMO...this could be a real, real ugly situation for them...
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5283 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:37 am

gotcha thanks....and i do ask because i love breezy days like this...helps with the heat and is neat to listen to out your window at night...and do no real harm save some rip currents. This is a total admission wishcaster of gusty weather that does no harm except to those who hate listening to other people's windchimes..lol

cpdaman wrote:jinftl

on TWC they said that the winds above s.fl are very high "very high" and that these winds could/would be pulled down in squalls.

i also wonder how the pressure gradient would change (and thus tweak the wind forecast), should the system be 75 miles further south , yet perhaps maintain a lower pressure (since it would be over land yes) i would guess the two differences; further away, yet lower pressure would = pretty much no change "a wash" and winds would probably verify as forecast
Last edited by jinftl on Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#5284 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:38 am

Given the models are only suggesting a 285 type motion if it can stay on its current heading for a little while longer it may well stay in the water for a good length of time given the way the land curves but thats the difference between a 40kts TS emerging and a 60-70kts system emerging IMO, big difference for the gulf states.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#5285 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:38 am

Image

Half and half.
0 likes   

BigB0882
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2284
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:08 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Contact:

#5286 Postby BigB0882 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:38 am

Ike, if you are listening, please go somewhere else. Gustav caused the In Laws to move in until their power returns. I don't know how much more I can handle! :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5287 Postby boca » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:39 am

cpdaman wrote:jinftl

on TWC they said that the winds above s.fl are very high "very high" and that these winds could/would be pulled down in squalls.

i also wonder how the pressure gradient would change (and thus tweak the wind forecast), should the system be 75 miles further south , yet perhaps maintain a lower pressure (since it would be over land less)

it may depend on wether the high winds above the ground in s.fl were directly due to the forecast proximity of the hurricane, but i would guess the two differences i mentioned would likely result in minimal change in the forecast, regardless


I don't see us getting the rain from Ike just the 20-30mph winds.I think the northern extend of the rain should be in the Keys.
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: Re:

#5288 Postby AJC3 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:41 am

tallywx wrote: If that outer eyewall becomes the dominant feature, would that still be categorized as an "inner core"? Wouldn't that produce an area 60-70 miles in diameter with light winds - meaning it would lack an inner core? How is that any different from Wilma/Jeanne/Frances, storms that also lacked "inner cores" with calm areas that large?


Some poor phraseology on my part. It will probably become the central feature of Ike, eventually - I suppose it shouldn't be called an 'inner core' unless it does and then contracts some.
Last edited by AJC3 on Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5289 Postby cpdaman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:42 am

boca wrote:
cpdaman wrote:jinftl

on TWC they said that the winds above s.fl are very high "very high" and that these winds could/would be pulled down in squalls.

i also wonder how the pressure gradient would change (and thus tweak the wind forecast), should the system be 75 miles further south , yet perhaps maintain a lower pressure (since it would be over land less)

it may depend on wether the high winds above the ground in s.fl were directly due to the forecast proximity of the hurricane, but i would guess the two differences i mentioned would likely result in minimal change in the forecast, regardless


I don't see us getting the rain from Ike just the 20-30mph winds.I think the northern extend of the rain should be in the Keys.


that's a fair point, with ike being further south , we would probably get less "squalls" and thus less chance for the storms to pull down the higher winds .

also don't forget that they tremdously fumbled the rain amounts with hanna in s. fl .......they called for 30% showers and we got widespread 3-6 inches of rain lol... they probably don't want to take the chance to underforecast rain amounts like that again
Last edited by cpdaman on Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5290 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:43 am

awesome...may turn out to be actualy quite a nice few days then...breezy, subsidence induced sunshine maybe...good surf in the atlantic for those who dare and know the rip current danger....


boca wrote:
cpdaman wrote:jinftl

on TWC they said that the winds above s.fl are very high "very high" and that these winds could/would be pulled down in squalls.

i also wonder how the pressure gradient would change (and thus tweak the wind forecast), should the system be 75 miles further south , yet perhaps maintain a lower pressure (since it would be over land less)

it may depend on wether the high winds above the ground in s.fl were directly due to the forecast proximity of the hurricane, but i would guess the two differences i mentioned would likely result in minimal change in the forecast, regardless


I don't see us getting the rain from Ike just the 20-30mph winds.I think the northern extend of the rain should be in the Keys.
0 likes   

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

Re:

#5291 Postby Roxy » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:44 am

BiBo882 wrote:Ike, if you are listening, please go somewhere else. Gustav caused the In Laws to move in until their power returns. I don't know how much more I can handle!


Ouch!! Bless your heart!!
Last edited by Roxy on Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
bayoubebe
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:39 pm
Location: NOLA

#5292 Postby bayoubebe » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:45 am

How much weakening is Cuba anticipated to make on Ike?
It doesn't look weakened to my amateur eye at this point. :?:
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

#5293 Postby gboudx » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:46 am

To those doubting jeff on the windfield expansion, he said on a recent conference call he sees a Katrina/Carla sized storm. But not as big as Gilbert. I didn't realize we had so many experts on this board. We are so blessed.
0 likes   

User avatar
carversteve
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:40 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5294 Postby carversteve » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:48 am

Would i be correct in saying, Ike is going to miss the next forecast point to the south by quite a bit?
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#5295 Postby jinftl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:48 am

Local met said the same thing this am.....look for a huge windfield (diameter) akin to any of the bigger gulf systems we have seen in recent memory.

I would think a large windfield has surge implications as water over a big area gets in the act?

gboudx wrote:To those doubting jeff on the windfield expansion, he said on a recent conference call he sees a Katrina/Carla sized storm. But not as big as Gilbert. I didn't realize we had so many experts on this board. We are so blessed.
Last edited by jinftl on Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#5296 Postby rockyman » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:50 am

NHC 11am--nudged another 1/2 degree west


outlook valid 12/1200z 27.0n 90.5w
Max wind 100 kt...gusts 120 kt.

Outlook valid 13/1200z 28.5n 93.5w
Max wind 100 kt...gusts 120 kt.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#5297 Postby KWT » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:50 am

gboudx, the idea that it would expand into a very large hurricane wa son the assumption that the core would unwrap overland and therefore 'grow'. However the track has meant that it won't travel over Cuba totally but instead over the Caribbean for a good period of time it appears. Therefore the core will probably stay as it is now, maybe even tighten up a litytle bit if it can continue due west for a little bit longer.
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re:

#5298 Postby rtd2 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:50 am

gboudx wrote:To those doubting jeff on the windfield expansion, he said on a recent conference call he sees a Katrina/Carla sized storm. But not as big as Gilbert. I didn't realize we had so many experts on this board. We are so blessed.





Agreed we ARE BLESSED... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
Galvestongirl
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 288
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 8:13 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5299 Postby Galvestongirl » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:52 am

I dont know if this has been mentioned, but earlier this morning on the television it was mentioned that the "track is earily like the great storm of 1900."
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#5300 Postby boca » Mon Sep 08, 2008 9:53 am

I hope this keeps on going due west because whats this storm going to do to our gas prices with those oil rigs in the NW GOM.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests