ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6121 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:22 am

If it can maintain this speed and heading...(290-300) then there is room for it too go north righ now.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6122 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:25 am

Its going to be close Deltadog, I get the feeling the GFS is too fast and you mentioned the same thing in the other thread.

Anyway right now still seems like Texas has the main threat, would have to be a big change around for it not to hit Texas or Mexico now.

Anyway it does seem like for now Ike is a little north now of its forecast point, nothing too extreme but just a touch.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6123 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:27 am

deltadog03 wrote:If it can maintain this speed and heading...(290-300) then there is room for it too go north righ now.


Mr Delta Dog, can you clarify "room"... do you mean that there is room synoptically north of his current position?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6124 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:29 am

Based on Cuban Radar looks to me like a EWRC is about to start.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6125 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:34 am

Isaw no signs of an EWRC in the latest microwave imagery I saw earlier to be honest but that was a little old now.

Anyway inner core still looks tight and compact...its going to come inland nearly *exactly* where Gustav made landfall which is not what they need!

This systrem is almost like several of the last systems into one, Bertha's early track in the Atlantic (till Ike bent back WSW) Fay's skim of the Cuba coast, Gustav's hit on Cuba and early GoM track and Dolly's westward track in the western part... :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6126 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:36 am

On the Cimss site there is a ridge over the western gom and the main one that comes in and sprawls across the gom from the east. There is a little weakness right now, according to that map, to its north. I am just saying it should not move straight west for the time being.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6127 Postby Sabanic » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:42 am

Basically Ike has done just what he has wanted to do the entire time. If I am not mistaken he has rarely taken the route of the NHC, and it seems like they have had to adjust their track each update based on where he has gone. I realize that is how it usually is, but he has yet to follow it if I'm not mistaken. Just a question, but with a few of the models showing a rather strong northward turn prior to landfalling the TX coast, dd is there any possibility he makes this turn any sooner, and goes further eastward. Such as LA?
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7184
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6128 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:43 am

the general has a small eye, they just showed key west on local news and plenty of street flooding there

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6129 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:44 am

Sabanic wrote:Basically Ike has done just what he has wanted to do the entire time. If I am not mistaken he has rarely taken the route of the NHC, and it seems like they have had to adjust their track each update based on where he has gone. I realize that is how it usually is, but he has yet to follow it if I'm not mistaken. Just a question, but with a few of the models showing a rather strong northward turn prior to landfalling the TX coast, dd is there any possibility he makes this turn any sooner, and goes further eastward. Such as LA?


Well the NHC still says that its to early to say for sure where Ike will go so if your in LA then still keep an eye on Ike cause things can and often times do change this far out!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6130 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:45 am

jlauderdal, thats a very impressive image indeed, tight inner core as I expected.

I'm not at all surprised the keys have got flooding with the powerful outer bands, they look real nasty!
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6131 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 am

deltadog03 wrote:On the Cimss site there is a ridge over the western gom and the main one that comes in and sprawls across the gom from the east. There is a little weakness right now, according to that map, to its north. I am just saying it should not move straight west for the time being.


Interesting. Thanks for the clarification. Actually, I was looking at steering that was progged recently by GFS at 500mb, and the ridge does look at bit thin on this map; suppose it is the short wave that is going to miss to the north. Might provide for some fun wobble watching before the next ridge builds. Is there a good link that I can use to show steering currents that are currently in place? Also should we use 500 mb steering for this situation, or is the steering being governed at an even higher altitude?

Thanks,
Dr Brown
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6132 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:49 am

deltadog03 wrote:On the Cimss site there is a ridge over the western gom and the main one that comes in and sprawls across the gom from the east. There is a little weakness right now, according to that map, to its north. I am just saying it should not move straight west for the time being.


Yeah theres a little bit of the weakness and thats clearly where Ike will gain most of its latitude, quite how much will probably go a long way to knowing exactly where Ike will threaten in the weekend.

LA isn't in the clear yet, its looking less likely the region will get hit but its still far enough away for big changes.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6133 Postby Portastorm » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:51 am

The question has been raised about the possibility of dry-air intrusion with Ike as it would near the western Gulf coastline. Normally this would be the case. But a perusal of the 500mb plots of the 0z GFS shows a south to southwest flow from the Pacific (i.e. moist). In fact, some of the moisture from Lowell is blowing over Texas right now at the higher levels of the atmosphere. Looks like this would continue. Not certain but it looks to me like there may not be a lot of dry-air intrusion at play when Ike nears the coastline, albeit Mexico or Texas.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6134 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:51 am

To be quite honest, If I were in LA, TX, or MX I would be watching this like a hawk. The american models want to take this straight W'wd into mexico or southern TX. Euro models want to show north pull at the end and are further NE (SE TX). We shall see. Movement over the next 24 is crucial imo.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#6135 Postby KWT » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:57 am

Well as I said Delta I think how far north it gets now will give a good indication of where is in most danger in terms of regions anyway, because the motion once its lifted up around 36-48hrs should be pretty much Westerly, maybe north of west and so its not going to gain a huge amount of latitude.

The other thing to note if this sticks close to 26N then this is going to have very high heat content for a good 36=48hrs period after it emerges off Cuba, that is ideal with conditions aloft for a 150mph plus type hurricane... :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

#6136 Postby Emmett_Brown » Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:59 am

I think the biggest enemy of the forecast track would be a prolonged slowdown of some kind. Not saying that this is or is going to happen, but if it did, it obviously could cause shifts downstream. I notice that the trough late in the week shown by the GFS is digging fairly far south on the model, but Ike would be far west at that point. My point being that rate of speed could have bigger downstream affects than wobbles IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6137 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:02 am

Based on the recon fixes this morning I would say Ike has started more of a northern trek now. Yes I know that recon fixes aren't the best for deciding motion but considering Ike only has about a 9 mile wide eye each fix is with in 9 miles of the true center so I would say its safe to at the very least get a general est. of the motion based on the center fixes.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re:

#6138 Postby Portastorm » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:02 am

Emmett_Brown wrote:I think the biggest enemy of the forecast track would be a prolonged slowdown of some kind. Not saying that this is or is going to happen, but if it did, it obviously could cause shifts downstream. I notice that the trough late in the week shown by the GFS is digging fairly far south on the model, but Ike would be far west at that point. My point being that rate of speed could have bigger downstream affects than wobbles IMO.


Doc Brown, I think that is an excellent point and a slowdown would most certainly -- it seems -- encourage a more northward movement. That being said, there doesn't appear to be any atmospheric parameter that would significantly slow down Ike at all. You have a ridge ... you have a hurricane. Fairly simple.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6139 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:02 am

Agreed Doc...Any slow down in this will have huge implications....
0 likes   

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Category 1 - Discussion

#6140 Postby sphelps8681 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:05 am

Can his forecast change just by him being in the GOM?
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest