ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#3581 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:14 pm

TTheriot1975 wrote:Ok AFM...I asked a question earlier..maybe you can answer also...OK..when I see the 78 hr map..doesnt it look like the high is moved more east..that there is no more high as far east as central LA? To me it does...so why would that bring Ike into south Texas...wouldnt that pull him even more north?

Also what are your thoughts to eventual landfall?


On the 18z...the 500mb high is actually a little further NW. Moves from SW GA to CNTL AL.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re:

#3582 Postby Derek Ortt » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:16 pm

dwg71 wrote:This run is more close the previous four that had south texas landfall.. Not a great recurve yet through 90 hours.



its the 18Z GFS... which as we know is not the best of runs as it has the least synoptic data (along with the 6Z)
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#3583 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:31 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:Actually that is a Big shift back south. The last run was wll north, almost near Matagorda.


No its not that big of a shift. You might want to look at something that is a little higher resolution. You also need to NOT look at the vort max...since the vort max isn't the center (no vorticity near the center).

12Z run brings it in near Rockport at 00z.

The 18z run brings it in near CRP at 06z. So...its slower and about 50 miles to the south.

It also initializes wrong. At 6 hrs...it has the center on the western tip of Cuba...near 22.5/84.5 moving west. Now...Ike might make a 60 mile jog to the SW over the next hour...but somehow I doubt it.

And above all that...its the GFS for cryin out loud. Take it with a grain of salt fo now. Its track record with Ike...even over the last 48 hrs...is HORRIBLE.


Thanks for the clarification. I really don't know how to read those maps.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#3584 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:31 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:
dwg71 wrote:This run is more close the previous four that had south texas landfall.. Not a great recurve yet through 90 hours.



its the 18Z GFS... which as we know is not the best of runs as it has the least synoptic data (along with the 6Z)


I'm giving up. People aren't listening. They are going like dust in the wind with every little move in a model...even one that is HORRIBLE right now and is going to be off by 60 miles SE at 6 hrs out.

I give up.
0 likes   

HCSD
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 12:00 am

#3585 Postby HCSD » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:34 pm

AFM, Please do not give up on this forum. The majority are listening. I appreciate the pro mets.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#3586 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:34 pm

I agree AFM....Come DWG...Just listen for once please??? Just wait for the GFS to bust on movement over the next 6-12 hours.... :D
0 likes   

Johnny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1428
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: No Snow For You, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3587 Postby Johnny » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:35 pm

Hey AFM, don't leave brother....I'm folllowing what your saying.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#3588 Postby Stratosphere747 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:35 pm

ATTENTION...NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER

NCEP COUPLED GFDL HURRICANE MODEL FORECAST MADE FOR

TROPICAL STORM IKE 09L

INITIAL TIME 18Z SEP 9

DISCLAIMER ... THIS INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AS GUIDANCE. IT
REQUIRES INTERPRETATION BY HURRICANE SPECIALISTS AND SHOULD
NOT BE CONSIDERED AS A FINAL PRODUCT. PLEASE SEE THE TPC/NHC
OFFICIAL FORECAST.


FORECAST STORM POSITION

HOUR LATITUDE LONGITUDE HEADING/SPEED(KT)

0 22.7 83.4 295./ 9.9
6 23.0 84.3 289./ 8.7
12 23.4 84.9 303./ 7.2
18 24.1 85.7 313./ 9.3
24 24.6 86.3 311./ 8.5
30 25.0 87.1 295./ 8.0
36 25.3 88.1 286./ 8.8
42 25.6 89.1 285./ 9.4
48 25.7 90.2 278./10.1
54 25.9 91.3 279./10.3
60 26.1 92.6 281./11.6
66 26.5 93.8 288./12.2
72 27.0 95.1 288./12.3
78 27.5 96.4 292./12.5
84 28.0 97.4 298./ 9.8
90 28.7 98.1 315./ 9.8
96 29.7 98.7 328./10.8
102 30.9 98.8 357./12.1
108 32.2 98.8 0./13.0
114 33.7 98.4 13./15.5
120 34.9 97.0 50./16.6
126 35.9 94.9 65./19.6
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#3589 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:37 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:
dwg71 wrote:This run is more close the previous four that had south texas landfall.. Not a great recurve yet through 90 hours.



its the 18Z GFS... which as we know is not the best of runs as it has the least synoptic data (along with the 6Z)


I'm giving up. People aren't listening. They are going like dust in the wind with every little move in a model...even one that is HORRIBLE right now and is going to be off by 60 miles SE at 6 hrs out.

I give up.


LOL, calm down AFM. Don't let us peons get to you. We're learning.
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

#3590 Postby deltadog03 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:37 pm

GFDL looks to be about the same...
0 likes   

Ed Mahmoud

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3591 Postby Ed Mahmoud » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:46 pm

Looks like a Cat 3

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: Re:

#3592 Postby perk » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:54 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:
dwg71 wrote:This run is more close the previous four that had south texas landfall.. Not a great recurve yet through 90 hours.



its the 18Z GFS... which as we know is not the best of runs as it has the least synoptic data (along with the 6Z)


I'm giving up. People aren't listening. They are going like dust in the wind with every little move in a model...even one that is HORRIBLE right now and is going to be off by 60 miles SE at 6 hrs out.
I give up.





AFM i really wish you would'nt give up. (I UNDERSTAND YOUR FRUSTRATION) there are too many posters on this board that think they're pro-mets, but as a Fort Bend county resident that may be affected by Ike i as well as others depend on your expertise. Therefore i ask you to please re consider your exit.
0 likes   

User avatar
teal61
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Spring, TX

Re: Re:

#3593 Postby teal61 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:01 pm

I'm giving up. People aren't listening. They are going like dust in the wind with every little move in a model...even one that is HORRIBLE right now and is going to be off by 60 miles SE at 6 hrs out.
I give up.[/quote]




AFM i really wish you would'nt give up. (I UNDERSTAND YOUR FRUSTRATION) there are too many posters on this board that think they're pro-mets, but as a Fort Bend county resident that may be affected by Ike i as well as others depend on your expertise. Therefore i ask you to please re consider your exit.[/quote]



Yes please hang around because we need you guys to keep us informed. Its the same couple of ones that want to argue every time. If fact i've just chosen to block their posts because I get sick reading the same argumentative stuff over and over.

There are plenty of us that value your opinion.


Thanks AFM from a fellow civil servant.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aristotle
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Crowley, TX

Re:

#3594 Postby Aristotle » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:15 pm

deltadog03 wrote:I agree AFM....Come DWG...Just listen for once please??? Just wait for the GFS to bust on movement over the next 6-12 hours.... :D



I don't know what AFM is trying to say....but I will assure that I will listen if the lesson it taught. What should I be hearing? 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
Agua
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1138
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2003 4:54 pm
Location: Biloxi, Mississippi

#3595 Postby Agua » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:16 pm

Same here. AFM is about the most patient and helpful met on here. You know its bad when he throws in the towel.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3596 Postby TTheriot1975 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:23 pm

Ok..is the GFDL the same place as the 12z? What About HWRF?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: Re:

#3597 Postby tolakram » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:24 pm

Aristotle wrote:I don't know what AFM is trying to say....but I will assure that I will listen if the lesson it taught. What should I be hearing? 8-)


I think he's saying stop paying attention to crap runs of iffy models just because they do what you (the general you) think or want to happen. The next real runs start later tonight and we'll know at 2am or so if the models are following the euro's lead in this northward shift.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#3598 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:28 pm

Agua wrote:Same here. AFM is about the most patient and helpful met on here. You know its bad when he throws in the towel.


Not throwing in the towel just yet...but I do need a break.

I say this with the utmost respect...but candor...so please take it for what its worth (which depending on who you are...may not be much)...

The biggest diff b/w the promets and really good amatuer mets on this site...and a lot of other amatuer mets...is patience.

If you are an amatuer met and want to be a pro...go to school. If you are an amatuer met and want to be thought of as one of S2K's great amatuers...and we have several...

BE PATIENT.

Stop fawning all over every jump in the satellite and ever jog NW or W...OR N. Stop getting all crazy and calling things "trend is your friend" over 2 model runs. As TIME has proven...THERE WAS NO FRIEND IN THE TREND!!!!!!!!!!

So...get all geeked up over every little shift in everything...and continue to be thought of as an amatuer...and maybe an annoying one. Get some patience.

Many of you love the NHC...and you all know my issues with them. The one thing they have...IS PATIENCE. They lost that patience last night and we have a 150+ mile track shift over 3 advisories...only to end up headed for the same place. They won't make that mistake again.

I suggest you all stop making it too.

Now...sorry for the chewing out. I am taking a break and going to listen to the Eagles at the Toyota Center in Houston.

Peace.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3599 Postby TTheriot1975 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:31 pm

Thanks AFM...you do answer all my questions when I ask them. I appreciate that. I am a really really new one to this stuff. I have learned a lot from you and the other pro mets. I get confused and really dont understand all the things out there..but I am glad you have never gotten short with me...thanks again
0 likes   

User avatar
Aristotle
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 141
Age: 59
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:16 pm
Location: Crowley, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3600 Postby Aristotle » Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:51 pm

Heard YA AFM.

Understood!

Ok so now lets talk about the last 3 seconds of the next 2 frames..... :oops:

kidding

Seriously Thanks
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests