ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3801 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:46 pm

Clint_TX wrote:
txag2005 wrote:I hope this is an outlier. Looks like all the other models look to have fallen near Matagorda Bay.


Looks like the new upper air data was factored in..and the GFDL has a very very good track record at 60 hrs out.


Hmm, I wonder what is it going to take for the Mayor of Galveston to pull the trigger?
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3802 Postby jasons2k » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:47 pm

Stormcenter wrote:
txag2005 wrote:I hope this is an outlier.


I hope so. Anyway I'm not worried.....I know the GFDL's history.


You need to be.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3803 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:47 pm

We are still in GFDL's accuracy range for Ike at this distance. GFDL's history with Ike was nailing trends in advance. This is the second model "wavelength" I was talking about now showing up. GFDL leads with its tail so it is definitely taking the trough into consideration. This is now a tough nut because GFDL has already overblown a trough recurve west of Florida with Ike. The second wavelength is now a poleward rightward influence instead of an under-ridge influence that GFDL excelled at. I have a feeling they'll err on the safe side and you'll be hearing of an evacuation of Houston shortly.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3804 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:47 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Fighting over mileage between cities means one thing-STORM IS COMING.

UK Met went south and GFDL goes north....Goodness. Still no consensus and we are 72 hours out.



As the NHC has been saying for 2 days now...the middle TX coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#3805 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:47 pm

patgaz wrote:what do you consdier High island?....Bolivar penisula is what I consider High Island...


the town of High Island is located ~30 miles from Port Bolivar.. you gotta drive through Port Bolivar, then Crystal Beach, through Gilcrest, then you reach High Island. You think its somewhere else?[/quote]


PM me and we can discuss further.....model thread... :D
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3806 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:48 pm

Sanibel wrote:We are still in GFDL's accuracy range for Ike at this distance. GFDL's history with Ike was nailing trends in advance. This is the second model "wavelength" I was talking about now showing up. GFDL leads with its tail so it is definitely taking the trough into consideration. This is now a tough nut because GFDL has already overblown a trough recurve west of Florida with Ike. The second wavelength is now a poleward rightward influence instead of an under-ridge influence that GFDL excelled at. I have a feeling they'll err on the safe side and you'll be hearing of an evacuation of Houston shortly.



Excellent post Sanibel!
What concerns me is the Friday evening landfall. That's a little over 2 days away!
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3807 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:49 pm

Sanibel wrote:We are still in GFDL's accuracy range for Ike at this distance. GFDL's history with Ike was nailing trends in advance. This is the second model "wavelength" I was talking about now showing up. GFDL leads with its tail so it is definitely taking the trough into consideration. This is now a tough nut because GFDL has already overblown a trough recurve west of Florida with Ike. The second wavelength is now a poleward rightward influence instead of an under-ridge influence that GFDL excelled at. I have a feeling they'll err on the safe side and you'll be hearing of an evacuation of Houston shortly.


I dont think they will base the decison on one run of GFDL, I thin they will make a call after 4PM advisory. If euro swings east, I think track moves north, if it moves south near current landfall track by NHC, they leave track as is and discount GFDL until more move over to confirm.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3808 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:49 pm

jasons wrote:
Stormcenter wrote:
txag2005 wrote:I hope this is an outlier.


I hope so. Anyway I'm not worried.....I know the GFDL's history.


You need to be.


Thanks for the making me feel better. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3809 Postby micktooth » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:50 pm

Gang this is the MODELS THREAD not the Texas Geography thread, please, we are looking here for model info and interpretation. Thank you!
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#3810 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:50 pm

Anybody got the HWRF??
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3811 Postby southerngale » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:52 pm

micktooth wrote:Gang this is the MODELS THREAD not the Texas Geography thread, please, we are looking here for model info and interpretation. Thank you!


Ditto. PLEASE stay on topic. There's a discussion thread and an obs/prep thread.
0 likes   

Johnny
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1428
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:35 pm
Location: No Snow For You, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3812 Postby Johnny » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:53 pm

As AFM pointed out (the voice of reason) people from Matagorda to Galveston Island could be the highest threat area. If the ECMWF holds and the HWRF falls in line, everyone on the upper Texas coast better be prepared. Batten down the hatches boys in girls...we got uh biggen uh comin!!!!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3813 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:56 pm

12z HWRF landfall in Central Texas Coast.

Image

http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/hwrftc2. ... =Animation
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3814 Postby ROCK » Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:58 pm

HWRF shifted north also.......ECM shifts north its game on as the NHC will have no choice but to shift the cone over...
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3815 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:05 pm

Matagorda Bay
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#3816 Postby HouTXmetro » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:05 pm

Yes North shift by HWRF into Matagorda Bay. Next couple of runs will be crucial by all models.. Period.
0 likes   

shah8
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 363
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 4:36 pm

#3817 Postby shah8 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:14 pm

HWRF has a *very* sharp recurve-thingamajiggy. The end of the plot just plain looks weird, because it looks so much like a Florida recurve.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3818 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:15 pm

Voluntary evacuations for portions of Galveston County and Bolivar Peninsula.
0 likes   

User avatar
gboudx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4080
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:39 pm
Location: Rockwall, Tx but from Harvey, La

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3819 Postby gboudx » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:16 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Voluntary evacuations for portions of Galveston County and Bolivar Peninsula.


Just an fyi, I posted an update from Lidner in the top thread. He mentions all the current evac plans.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3820 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:16 pm

Ike's track has consistently come back south after these north shifts. So if GFDL goes east of Houston I would worry about it dragging the consensus and the track over Houston.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests