ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CoCo2
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:37 pm
Location: Plaquemines Parish, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3901 Postby CoCo2 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:50 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
ronjon wrote:18Z GFDL now just east of Galveston for LF. The question is.....Does it shift further to the Tx-La border ala Rita?


Possible.


Nothing against Louisiana, but I kinda hope so.


Oh that's nice thing to say. Nothing against Texas, but you can have it. Louisiana can't take anymore. We are hurting pretty bad.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#3902 Postby dwg71 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:53 pm

exactly how Rita went down, lets hope we can put up hurricane shield again...

doubt it though
0 likes   

User avatar
AL Chili Pepper
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 873
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 1:15 pm
Location: Mobile, AL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3903 Postby AL Chili Pepper » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:54 pm

Ed Mahmoud wrote:
ronjon wrote:18Z GFDL now just east of Galveston for LF. The question is.....Does it shift further to the Tx-La border ala Rita?


Possible.


Nothing against Louisiana, but I kinda hope so.


Even a few miles east would help out tremendously, and it will be a miracle of this track is dead on accurate. I almost felt guilty after Ivan when I got my power back the next day, while parts of Baldwin and Pensacola were hammered.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#3904 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:55 pm

18Z HWRF sticks with Corpus...Humm
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#3905 Postby rockyman » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:58 pm

GFDL at 60 hours:
Image

HWRF at 60 hours:
Image
Last edited by rockyman on Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re:

#3906 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:58 pm

rockyman wrote:GFDL at 60 hours:
Image



Cat1?!
0 likes   

User avatar
Winsurfer
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:31 am
Location: SW Louisiana

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3907 Postby Winsurfer » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:00 pm

ronjon wrote:18Z GFDL now just east of Galveston for LF. The question is.....Does it shift further to the Tx-La border ala Rita?



Looks just West of Galveston to my uneducated eye.
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#3908 Postby rockyman » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:00 pm

The GFDL is showing Cat 3 right before landfall (the 60 hours point is after landfall)
Last edited by rockyman on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#3909 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:01 pm

GFDL comes in around 110kts by the way, thats after landfall when it has weakened to a borderline 2/3.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#3910 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:08 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:18Z HWRF sticks with Corpus...Humm


HWRF is NE of Pt Aransas...not Corpus. Its about 50 miles SW of where it was ay 12Z.

NHC likes to take a blend of the two...so b/w the two that puts it over W Matagorda CTY.

BUT...the HWRF initialized too far west for 6 hrs out. The GFDL was almost spot on.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3911 Postby mattpetre » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:14 pm

AFM,

Why are initializations off by so much. This is frustrating, so many local mets here in Houston still counting on the Corpus landfall and so many in government not pulling the trigger to force anything to happen. I'm worried that in the end many people will be hurt and/or trapped on highways they didn't think they would be on for more than a few hours. Why can't we erre on the side of caution????
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#3912 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:18 pm

My advice? It's very late in the game now. Stop watching the models because as of now we know the general rules of this game.


Satellite loops tell the tale.
0 likes   

mattpetre
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 510
Age: 53
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 3:20 pm
Location: Missouri City,TX & Galleria
Contact:

Re:

#3913 Postby mattpetre » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:19 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:My advice? It's very late in the game now. Stop watching the models because as of now we know the general rules of this game.


Satellite loops tell the tale.


Too early to avoid models... do you think the NHC is ignoring them?
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Re: Re:

#3914 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:19 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:18Z HWRF sticks with Corpus...Humm


HWRF is NE of Pt Aransas...not Corpus. Its about 50 miles SW of where it was ay 12Z.

NHC likes to take a blend of the two...so b/w the two that puts it over W Matagorda CTY.

BUT...the HWRF initialized too far west for 6 hrs out. The GFDL was almost spot on.


Sorry this FL resident is not the greatest when it comes to TX geography..Trying to look at a line..my bad
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2776
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re:

#3915 Postby Frank P » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:21 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:My advice? It's very late in the game now. Stop watching the models because as of now we know the general rules of this game.


Satellite loops tell the tale.


Satellites tell you where its been, not necessarily where it is going to go... models are critical in determining forecast..
0 likes   

User avatar
RBDnhm
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3916 Postby RBDnhm » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:22 pm

Using Google and lat/long from forecast, it is Jamaica Beach, Galveston, just west of the sea wall. I think that is right.

Winsurfer wrote:
ronjon wrote:18Z GFDL now just east of Galveston for LF. The question is.....Does it shift further to the Tx-La border ala Rita?



Looks just West of Galveston to my uneducated eye.
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3917 Postby HurricaneRobert » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:23 pm

mattpetre wrote:AFM,

Why are initializations off by so much. This is frustrating, so many local mets here in Houston still counting on the Corpus landfall and so many in government not pulling the trigger to force anything to happen. I'm worried that in the end many people will be hurt and/or trapped on highways they didn't think they would be on for more than a few hours. Why can't we erre on the side of caution????


Oh, because you know, Gustav and Rita were total nonevents. :roll:
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: Re:

#3918 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:25 pm

Frank P wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:My advice? It's very late in the game now. Stop watching the models because as of now we know the general rules of this game.


Satellite loops tell the tale.


Satellites tell you where its been, not necessarily where it is going to go... models are critical in determining forecast..


What do you need to know? lol. The story hasn't changed in DAYS.


There is a big ridge that is gonna send this storm in a general WNW/NW direction for the next 72 hours....the only dramatic shift in this logic is the trough..which the models AREN'T seeing.

That's exactly my point...models are bunk. Watch the storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ixolib
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2741
Age: 68
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3919 Postby Ixolib » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:31 pm

Comanche wrote:...If you don't know anything about structutral engineering, please don't answer with an opinion.
Don't know diddly about structural engineering - so, sorry, but I'm answering anyway...

At 23' above MSL, you're not high enough to discount the possibility of surge. It's not until you're at about 40 feet that you can begin disregarding the surge issue - especially with a cat 3+. Therefore, who cares about structural engineering!!

The old adage, "hide from the wind, run from the water" absolutely spells out your issue...

No opinion, just fact. BTDT...
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3920 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:35 pm

Most models have shifted north at 00Z.

All models now b/w Aransas Pass and GLS.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests