ATL IKE: Models Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
pablolopez26
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm

#3921 Postby pablolopez26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:46 pm

7PM
Image


4PM
Image

It seems the GFDL stayed put. The BAMMS model is also around the GFDL run.

The rest are right above CC. There is still a significant split. So, its all up to the GFDL now.
Last edited by pablolopez26 on Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3922 Postby TTheriot1975 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:47 pm

can you post the spaghetti model
0 likes   

lonelymike
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 10:12 am
Location: walton county fla

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3923 Postby lonelymike » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:48 pm

Air Force Met wrote:Most models have shifted north at 00Z.

All models now b/w Aransas Pass and GLS.



Houston...we have a problem. :eek:
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#3924 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:49 pm

pablolopez26 wrote:It seems the GFDL stayed put. The BAMMS model is also around the GFDL run.

The rest are right above CC. There is still a significant split. So, its all up to the GFDL now.


If by right above Corpus you mean 50 miles...then you are right. the closest interpolated model at 00z is 50 miles north of Corpus.
0 likes   

User avatar
A1A
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3925 Postby A1A » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:50 pm

Image
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3926 Postby Air Force Met » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:51 pm

Steve now showing the old models on the TV....

"Incestuous models..."

I like that. The term...not the incest. :D :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
RBDnhm
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: Lumberton, Texas

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3927 Postby RBDnhm » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:57 pm

Which of the sophisticated models are not "incestuous?" GFS/GFDL obviously are. Are UKMET/Euro based on others?
Last edited by RBDnhm on Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

pablolopez26
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm

#3928 Postby pablolopez26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:59 pm

Look at the NAM model track. Looks like that supercomputer went to lunch.

GFDL has stayed put for the last 2 runs. I dont like that, i see the GFDL as a pretty consistent model.

Oh well, i dont know much about these models anyways!
0 likes   

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3929 Postby sphelps8681 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:01 pm

Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.
0 likes   

Serenity
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 10:41 am

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3930 Postby Serenity » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:06 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.


Well how far off is he going to be though? :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
TreasureIslandFLGal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1581
Age: 57
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2004 6:16 pm
Location: Clearwater, Florida ~3 miles from the coast now. We finally moved safely off the barrier island!

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3931 Postby TreasureIslandFLGal » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:10 pm

sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.



Ha ha! I immediately asked where Stephanie Abrahms(?) was, since we saw her keep getting smacked a few years back whenever she went into the field. It seemed they placed her is less likely landfalls than Cantore, but wherever she wound up, they would hit!

-But Nikki just reminded me that she was in the studio tonite. But wherever they do decide to put her....watch out. :(
0 likes   

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3932 Postby sphelps8681 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:13 pm

Serenity wrote:
sphelps8681 wrote:Well Jim C. is in Galveston if I heard correctly. We know what that means. Ha Ha.


Well how far off is he going to be though? :lol:


I believe he said he went from Port Lavaca to Freeport to Galveston.

It is quite surprising that we N. of Beaumont don't even have School Closures or Evacuations. I did hear that the lower lying areas of Jefferson, Hardin, and I believe Orange county was forcasting Voluntary Evacs.

By listening to the local mets just forcasting TS winds. Seems quite odd. But I could be wrong.
0 likes   

pablolopez26
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2008 5:10 pm

Which Model to Trust

#3933 Postby pablolopez26 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:14 pm

Image

The GFDL model, then, missed the 24-hour forecast by an average of 55.4 miles, doing the best of all the models.

GFDL NWS/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory model
HWRF NWS Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting
UKM United Kingdom Meteorological Service model
NGPS Navy Operational Global Prediction System
GFSO NWS/Global Forecast System (formerly Aviation)
EMX ECMWF (European) global model
OCD5 An early model shown for comparison


http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/2008/09/an_ike_update_a.html

For the year 2007, then, the UKMET model did demonstrably better at five-day forecasts and three-day forecasts. The obvious conclusion to draw is that, for Hurricane Gustav, we should have been paying the closest attention to the UKMET model.

So let's do that retrospectively. Here's the model's projection at three days before landfall:

Image

Oops. I don't think Gustav made landfall near the Texas/Mexico border. So we see that the model that did the absolute very best with long-term forecasts last year failed with Gustav by 700 miles.
0 likes   

User avatar
TampaFl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1904
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 11:23 am
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3934 Postby TampaFl » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:17 pm

2100 UTC steering flow - High pressure over the Texas coast appears to be hanging strong. Ike continues in the weakness between the two highs.

Image
Last edited by TampaFl on Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

TTheriot1975
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 113
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:12 pm
Location: Southeast Texas

#3935 Postby TTheriot1975 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:21 pm

wow..if that were to stay..then Florida would be back in the picture...lol..just kidding folks...but that would really be a bad thing
0 likes   

User avatar
terrapintransit
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 275
Age: 50
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:08 pm
Location: Williamsport, Pa

Re:

#3936 Postby terrapintransit » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:23 pm

TTheriot1975 wrote:wow..if that were to stay..then Florida would be back in the picture...lol..just kidding folks...but that would really be a bad thing


It would certainly catch the Central Gulf by surprise.........
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3937 Postby thetruesms » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:45 pm

mattpetre wrote:AFM,

Why are initializations off by so much. This is frustrating, so many local mets here in Houston still counting on the Corpus landfall and so many in government not pulling the trigger to force anything to happen. I'm worried that in the end many people will be hurt and/or trapped on highways they didn't think they would be on for more than a few hours. Why can't we erre on the side of caution????
In short, a lack of high-density, quality data. All the models have to work with over open waters are satellite data, recon flights when they're out there, and some widely spaced buoy and ship reports. From that, the model has to create its analysis. With all of the interpolation and estimation it has to do, there are bound to be errors Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#3938 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:46 pm

Middle Tx. coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
Sabanic
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 683
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 7:01 am
Location: Mobile, AL
Contact:

Re:

#3939 Postby Sabanic » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:57 pm

Stormcenter wrote:Middle Tx. coast.


What SC?
0 likes   

User avatar
jrbaytown
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 8
Age: 45
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 6:15 pm
Location: Baytown, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Models Discussion

#3940 Postby jrbaytown » Wed Sep 10, 2008 8:59 pm

jimguru wrote:Is there one particular model that seems historically to be more accurate than another? Just curious as I have said before I am new to the Gulf / Atlantic Storm Basin Scene.


Maybe this will help you or lead you in the right direction. It gives a summary of the top six models and also talks about the HWRF, which according to the website is supposed to replace the GFDL in 2009:

http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/models.asp
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests