ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#9521 Postby fasterdisaster » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:28 pm

Even if it were to make landfall east of Galveston it would have to be more than 30 miles away for them to avoid hurricane winds.
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re:

#9522 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:28 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t4/loop-ft.html

WSW jog?



Don't get me excited.....it's just a wobble right?

http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satelli ... duration=9
Last edited by Stormcenter on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
hiflyer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 562
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:24 am
Location: West Broward Florida

#9523 Postby hiflyer » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:29 pm

After 25 years down in SoFla I have one question...why do most of these storms do their US landfall at night? Is it written in code somewhere? I've done a few of these and I would far prefer a day passage over a night transit...but the NHC says 0100 on the coast....
0 likes   

CoCo2
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:37 pm
Location: Plaquemines Parish, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9524 Postby CoCo2 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:31 pm

Jijenji wrote:Ok, let me remind everyone again that I'm an amateur. But that being said, it sure looks to me on the water vapor loops that the center of the storm is much further north?



Boy sure feels that way, should have seen the rain and the wind that just went through upper Plaquemines Parish. The rain/wind band lasted about 10 minutes and I'm sure gusted to 60mph. Crazy! Tonite is going to be rough.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#9525 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:31 pm

Stormcenter, it probably is, recon does show that its moved more or less westward since the lass pass but that probably means very little and will no doubt get corrected down the road.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#9526 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:31 pm

seems unlikely to dodge that big of a bullet at this point...landfall further west than rita



weather offices inland are on top of the potential inland effects. From NWS Shreveport

TROPICAL STORM WIND WATCH IS IN EFFECT FOR PART OF NORTHEAST
TEXAS...MILLER COUNTY IN SOUTWEST ARKANSAS...AND NORTHWEST
LOUISIANA...SOUTHWEST OF A LINE FROM CLARKSVILLE TEXAS...TO
TEXARKANA ARKANSAS...TO NATCHITOCHES LOUISIANA.
fasterdisaster wrote:Even if it were to make landfall east of Galveston it would have to be more than 30 miles away for them to avoid hurricane winds.
0 likes   

weunice
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 10:08 am
Location: Denham Springs, LA

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9527 Postby weunice » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:31 pm

hiflyer wrote:After 25 years down in SoFla I have one question...why do most of these storms do their US landfall at night? Is it written in code somewhere? I've done a few of these and I would far prefer a day passage over a night transit...but the NHC says 0100 on the coast....
Gustav made landfall close to daylight (I dont remember if it was before or after). Baton Rouge got the worst of it during the afternoon.
0 likes   

luvcanescarol
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:21 am
Location: Wayne, NJ

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9528 Postby luvcanescarol » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:32 pm

I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

Re:

#9529 Postby MiamiensisWx » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:33 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:One small consolation for Galveston Bay:

If Ike makes landfall directly on Galveston and the mouth of the bay, the large wind radii and RMW would imply that the greatest surge values would occur farther east (closer to High Island). Of course, this is contingent on the landfall location and RMW size. If the RMW shrinks (while the wind radii remains as large as the current situation), Galveston Bay would experience the largest surge values. This will be VERY important...

Houston/Galveston area members, PAY attention to this point... do not be complacent in the future if Ike's greatest surge occurs farther east.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#9530 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:33 pm

KWT wrote:Stormcenter, it probably is, recon does show that its moved more or less westward since the lass pass but that probably means very little and will no doubt get corrected down the road.


Yeah, it more than likely will correct itself and when it does we are all going to swear it's made the north turn. But per both satellites and recon it did do a big jog west and possibly WSW.
Last edited by HouTXmetro on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#9531 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:33 pm

wilma and bulk of katrina were day events...as evidenced by the amount of video clips people have posted from both on youtube etc

hiflyer wrote:After 25 years down in SoFla I have one question...why do most of these storms do their US landfall at night? Is it written in code somewhere? I've done a few of these and I would far prefer a day passage over a night transit...but the NHC says 0100 on the coast....
0 likes   

rtd2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1183
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 12:45 pm
Location: Biloxi, MS

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9532 Postby rtd2 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:34 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#9533 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:34 pm

The other thing to note is the surge is already starting to build up now in SE Texas, nothing too severe but it will only increase as the system works its way towards the coastline.

Just praying everyone comes out ok...
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#9534 Postby KWT » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:36 pm

MiamiensisWx wrote:
MiamiensisWx wrote:One small consolation for Galveston Bay:

If Ike makes landfall directly on Galveston and the mouth of the bay, the large wind radii and RMW would imply that the greatest surge values would occur farther east (closer to High Island). Of course, this is contingent on the landfall location and RMW size. If the RMW shrinks (while the wind radii remains as large as the current situation), Galveston Bay would experience the largest surge values. This will be VERY important...

Houston/Galveston area members, PAY attention to this point... do not be complacent in the future if Ike's greatest surge occurs farther east.


VEry good point, though I suspect in this case either way the Galveston Sewall is going to gt over topped to some extent, its just a matter of how badly I reckon at the moment.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9535 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:38 pm

not sataellite images...but nhc graphical display really shows the wind field blossoming in the loop..

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/graphics/al09/loop_R.shtml

luvcanescarol wrote:I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?
0 likes   

luvcanescarol
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 3:21 am
Location: Wayne, NJ

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9536 Postby luvcanescarol » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:41 pm

That's really interesting. Thank you for posting it!
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#9537 Postby O Town » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:41 pm

Water vapor loop showing dry air still to the N and W of Ike.

Image
0 likes   

cheekygeek
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 10:35 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9538 Postby cheekygeek » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:43 pm

luvcanescarol wrote:I would really like to see Ike's historical track, from his birth til now, in satellite photos. Does anyone have that?


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26295161/
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#9539 Postby jinftl » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:43 pm

it is a great review of where we have been so far with ike too....and the graphics the nhc use give it almost 'cartoonish' quality which is ironic since we are tracking a beast!

luvcanescarol wrote:That's really interesting. Thank you for posting it!
0 likes   

Rod Hagen
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland

Re: Re:

#9540 Postby Rod Hagen » Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:43 pm

rtd2 wrote:NHC on target again 4-5 days out...kudos again they need to start 7 day forecast on future storms



4 days out they had landfall at 27.5N 97.0W, rtd2.

They now have it at 29.0N 95.0W

There has been a consistent underestimation of the northern movement by about .5º in just about every 12 hour forecast. That is why the track keeps shifting north.

Not bad, but if you add a couple of extra days the difference gets pretty substantial.

Cheers

Rod
Last edited by Rod Hagen on Thu Sep 11, 2008 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 149 guests