ATL: IKE Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Raider Power
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 45
- Age: 60
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:20 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Re:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike most certainly is not south of the forecast points by a wide margin...WNW motion is definite. He appears to be right on track..for the first time ever i'd say.
Given that the expected landfall, I believe has not moved more than 50 miles for most of the daylight hours, it would seem to me the storm has mostly been on schedule all day long.
0 likes
Re: Re:
Storm Contractor wrote:Aristotle wrote:Derek Ortt wrote:put the GFDL in the circular file
Lol now thats my kind of pro met. Humor!
I would have expected something like "ceramic hydro-vortex"
lol

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2718
- Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
- Location: Beaumont, TX
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
Always giving the worst case scenario...Everyone does it on here.
All you have to do is use common sense. This is not a Tsunami but it's not something to play with.
Also, CNN and Fox News are worthless..They never report on the weather unless something like this is in the making.
All you have to do is use common sense. This is not a Tsunami but it's not something to play with.
Also, CNN and Fox News are worthless..They never report on the weather unless something like this is in the making.
0 likes
- Lowpressure
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2032
- Age: 58
- Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 9:17 am
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
Re:
Derek Ortt wrote:yes, steve lyons is one of the very best tropical meteorologists in the business
Derek, it really appears as if Ike is in a strengthening phase with one eyewall and much more symetrical outflow. Recon does not yet seem to be reflecting this however. What are you seeing here?
0 likes
- amawea
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 385
- Age: 73
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 3:36 pm
- Location: Horseshoe Bend, Ar. but from Baytown, Tx
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
IMHO. Steve Lyons os a straight shooter. He doesn't hype it but he doesn't belittle it either. He generally states what the NHC is saying and then gives his opinion as to why it's the way it is. Straight up forecasting. I like that.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22995
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
Just a reminder, you can get near real time wind field plots of Ike on the HRD web site. The last one is just 40 minutes old:
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... /wind.html
As you can see, Ike's wind field is not quite as large as the NHC is stating in the advisories, at least as far as the 50kt and 64 kt. There are basically no hurricane force winds in the southwest side of the storm except very near the center (10-15 miles from the center). The TS winds extend out a good ways, though. NHC is just keeping that 100nm hurricane force radius in there to the NE-SE but that's a bit too far out there. Still, Ike's a bit above average. You can take a look at a storm like Katrina's wind field in the same area and there's absolutely no comparison. Katrina was way larger than Ike, as was Rita and Ivan.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/data_sub/wind2005.html
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... /wind.html
As you can see, Ike's wind field is not quite as large as the NHC is stating in the advisories, at least as far as the 50kt and 64 kt. There are basically no hurricane force winds in the southwest side of the storm except very near the center (10-15 miles from the center). The TS winds extend out a good ways, though. NHC is just keeping that 100nm hurricane force radius in there to the NE-SE but that's a bit too far out there. Still, Ike's a bit above average. You can take a look at a storm like Katrina's wind field in the same area and there's absolutely no comparison. Katrina was way larger than Ike, as was Rita and Ivan.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/data_sub/wind2005.html
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 6:22 am
- Location: Lives in Melbourne, works in N Queensland
Re:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike most certainly is not south of the forecast points by a wide margin...WNW motion is definite. He appears to be right on track..for the first time ever i'd say.
Not by a wide margin, Weatherfreak, but by enough to make a significant difference to landfall if it stays that way for much longer. Maybe .5ºS in the last 4 hours, I would estimate.
Just as we saw the forecast landfalls having to be pushed north continually for a couple of days, maybe we are going to see them shift back again somewhat. Too early to tell, of course, but the deviation has been fairly consistent for a while now.
Cheers
Rod
0 likes
- angelwing
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4462
- Age: 64
- Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 3:06 pm
- Location: Kulpsville, PA
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
CNN breaking news: People sheltering at ground level at Galveston Bay when Hurricane Ike hits face "certain death," the weather service warns.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:48 pm
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
lonelymike wrote:Don't mean for this to be insensitive or cruel. But maybe something good can come out of Ike if it gives people second thoughts about building or living on the coast. I cannot for the life of me understand why people take these kinds of risks when these kind of storms can cause such havoc. Maybe there is a silver lining of sorts if govts rethink their illogical building policies.
If you ever get the chance to watch the sunrise or sunset over the open water, then you would understand why we choose to live there. The fact that a storm MIGHT directly effect where you live 2 or 3 times in a lifetime is not that big of a risk! I know I would live in a stick shack with a water view before I would live in a mansion in the mountains!
0 likes
- AZRainman
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 12:48 pm
- Location: Sonoran Desert
- Contact:
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
8 live video news feeds of hurricane Ike, maps and more:
http://www.livenewscameras.com/map.html
Houston/Galveston Area Evacuation Maps, Government Links, School Closures, and Media Information
http://www.livenewscameras.com/map.html
Houston/Galveston Area Evacuation Maps, Government Links, School Closures, and Media Information
Last edited by AZRainman on Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 1:40 am
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
Been looking at observations from Buoy 42001 in the Mid Gulf at 25.9 N 89.667W - The eye must have passed pretty close to this buoy because at 4pm CST the air pressure at the buoy was 28.34in. Peak winds at the buoy today however were only 49 knots with gusts to 62 knots. Max wave hts was 30 ft at 2pm and is now most recently down to 16ft. At 750 pm winds had subsided a little to 45/58 knots with pressure rising rapidly.
Looks like Ike's going to have to do some pretty fast intensification to get to a Cat 3 or 4.
Looks like Ike's going to have to do some pretty fast intensification to get to a Cat 3 or 4.
0 likes
The dramatically improved outflow in the western side of Ike is step one in a possible intensification. He'll still need to get a new tight eyewall and more convection around the center to really get going.
As he is, he's a killer, and people will die if they stay in flood prone or low lying areas.
As he is, he's a killer, and people will die if they stay in flood prone or low lying areas.
0 likes
- Cape Verde
- Category 2
- Posts: 564
- Age: 70
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: Houston area
Re: Re:
Raider Power wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike most certainly is not south of the forecast points by a wide margin...WNW motion is definite. He appears to be right on track..for the first time ever i'd say.
Given that the expected landfall, I believe has not moved more than 50 miles for most of the daylight hours, it would seem to me the storm has mostly been on schedule all day long.
It has.
Tomorrow's NHC advisory will nail it. I am anxiously awaiting that since I'm in the bullseye. Which side of the eyewall I'm on, or whether I'm in the middle of it makes a great deal of difference to where I move furniture, etc. I don't doubt I'll get the full force winds. I just want to know from which direction.
0 likes
- mvtrucking
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 698
- Age: 66
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
- Location: Monroe,La
Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion
angelwing wrote:CNN breaking news: People sheltering at ground level at Galveston Bay when Hurricane Ike hits face "certain death," the weather service warns.
CNN is about 10 hours behind on that "breaking news".
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
- Location: Miami, Florida
Re:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Ike most certainly is not south of the forecast points by a wide margin...WNW motion is definite. He appears to be right on track..for the first time ever i'd say.
I'd say he's both on track and south. Just because a storm isn't exactly on the line doesn't mean it's not on track. I think a vortex put it around 10 miles south (?) but it's a result of stairstepping so the end result is the same.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests