ATL: IKE Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10081 Postby HurricaneRobert » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:09 pm

I think that's more dry air thinning the eyewall, rather than replacing it with a larger one. But I won't argue anything since people here bit at me early today for suggesting the pressure was rising a little bit and that I thought the storm might make landfall at category 2 intensity.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#10082 Postby Derek Ortt » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:11 pm

I have seen dry air mentioned on this forum a lot lately... and despite explaining what is needd for dry air to cause weakening, we still see the same wrong info posted time and again

without shear, dry air cannot penetrate the core
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10083 Postby curtadams » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:11 pm

Lots of talk about the Houston area but the surge map shows Port Arthur getting the worst - a 23 foot surge, which matches Camille, which *used* to be the example for ungodly surge. I hope the people in far NE Texas are getting properly warned, because this might be a lot worse than Rita for them and I doubt many would expect that from a storm coming in to Galveston.
0 likes   

wxsouth
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:57 am

Re:

#10084 Postby wxsouth » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:12 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc08/ATL/09L.IKE/tc_ssmis/91h/2degreeticks/full/Latest.html

starting to wonder if this will even intensify at all.



Like I mentioned earlier Derek, significant intensification seems unlikely unless the remnants of the inner core convection collapse completely and the convection focuses on the 100nm eyewall. While the convection in the outer eyewall does seem to be a bit better organized...the inner core convection is still going. If the inner core collapses, we might see 100kt...otherwise...probably steady state.
0 likes   

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10085 Postby HurricaneRobert » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:13 pm

They mentioned it in Discussion 43, right before they mentioned the weakening convection on the west side. Something is causing those huge breaks near the core.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#10086 Postby Steve » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:13 pm

>>It would be pretty crazy for two storms to spend over 36 hours each in the GOM in Late August/Early September and not get stronger and maybe actually weaken.

Dynomat? :D
------------------------
We're seeing some near TS conditions this evening down my way after some tidal flooding throughout NWFL, AL, MS and SELA this evening. Not bad for a storm as far away as Ike currently is from me.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 146106
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10087 Postby cycloneye » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:13 pm

Ike will be one that the mets here and in the NHC will make plenty of studies about its unique track and about its eternal struggle to organize one inner core.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5197
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#10088 Postby ConvergenceZone » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:14 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc08/ATL/09L.IKE/tc_ssmis/91h/2degreeticks/full/Latest.html

starting to wonder if this will even intensify at all.


You may be right Derek. I'm reading more posts from other METS on here that are now stating that it may not intensify.....
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10089 Postby Nederlander » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:14 pm

im here in mid jefferson county and we were going to ride it out, but Greg Bostwick, Chief Met for KFDM 6 in Beaumont said anyone south of I-10 needs to get out. Storm surge could be 20+ feet which would definitely top the seawall in port arthur. He also mentioned the levees protecting mid county could breach if the storm surge is that large. I am getting a real sick feeling to my stomach. Even though this wont be as strong as Rita, its implications on the Golden Triangle could be devastating. But I am heeding the warning and getting out in a few hours.... :cry:
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#10090 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:14 pm

let's hope/pray that Derek or some other future Cane scientist can write papers on why large gulf storms have trouble intensifying post-Rita...and hope it can be a 30 year study with no exceptions to the rule
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#10091 Postby RL3AO » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:15 pm

Looks to be due west or close to that according to recon in the past hour or two.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pebbles
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1994
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: New Lenox, IL (SW of Chicago)

Re: ATL IKE: Recon Discussion

#10092 Postby Pebbles » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:16 pm

pojo wrote:
Pebbles wrote:Kind of curious why they just flew around in circles a few times way NW of the storm... *ponders* They aren't having equipment problems are they? (that's if Pojo is around to answer and not on the plane :P )

I was on the plane... it was for timing


Uh.. that's so cool! :P ... I'd never have the nerve. I'm a wuss! :) So neat to sit here and think... Pojo might of just did that drop (I often did today as the dropsondes came in ya know!) How does it feel to have us recon addicts waiting on pins and needles for you to do your thing? *Winks*

P.S. If I was willing to send you 50 bucks to take a marker and write Pebbles says "More Recon Baby" on a dropsonde and email me a picture of it and which drop number it was ... would ya? This is just hypothetical of course! My hubby would never understand why I wanted $50 :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re:

#10093 Postby WxGuy1 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:17 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I have seen dry air mentioned on this forum a lot lately... and despite explaining what is needd for dry air to cause weakening, we still see the same wrong info posted time and again

without shear, dry air cannot penetrate the core


Derek,

Certainly you looked at visible satellite imagery quite a few times on Wednesday. It was very apparent that dry air was being entrained into Ike from the west. The IR didn't show it well because there was some thin cirrus overhead, but it was quite evident on visible satellite imagery. You've mentioned this enough times that I'm going to see if I can find a good vis sat image from yesterday to show as evidence.

Of course, you're only saying that dry air means nothing w/o shear, and you're not necessarily saying that shear was not present yesterday. However, you seem to be implying that dry air has had NO effect on Ike, an implication with which I disagree.
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

Re:

#10094 Postby curtadams » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:18 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I have seen dry air mentioned on this forum a lot lately... and despite explaining what is needd for dry air to cause weakening, we still see the same wrong info posted time and again

without shear, dry air cannot penetrate the core

But there *is* shear, Derek. 10-20 knots upper shear. And at mid-levels the hurricane generates little wind to mix it in. Since Ike has had virtually no rainbands to the W and N even a light breeze at the mid-levels could push the very dry continental air in. We've seen all along lots of evidence this has been happening, because Ike hasn't been able to generate an eyewall to the NW even with otherwise highly favorable conditions.
0 likes   

southmdwatcher
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:35 am

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10095 Postby southmdwatcher » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:19 pm

Looks like very deep convection is erupting in the area around the center(south and east side)

[img][/img]http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/SATRAPID/anim16ir.html
Last edited by southmdwatcher on Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10096 Postby Sanibel » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:19 pm

This could be an intensity guessing game until the center enters long range radar tomorrow.
0 likes   

fox13weather
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm

Re:

#10097 Postby fox13weather » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:21 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc08/ATL/09L.IKE/tc_ssmis/91h/2degreeticks/full/Latest.html

starting to wonder if this will even intensify at all.


He has had plenty of opportunity to do so today and could not. The environment ahead of the storm does not favor rapid intensification. Ike is yet another storm in a long list of storms where the intensity forecast was missed. until there is a better understanding of the energy transfer between the ocean and the storm there will be little improvment in the forecasts.
0 likes   

User avatar
SMNederlandTX
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 57
Age: 50
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:02 pm
Location: Nederland, TX

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10098 Postby SMNederlandTX » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:21 pm

Jijenji wrote:Have they issued mandatory evacuations for the Port Arthur area?



Yes they have issued mandatory evacuations for all of Jefferson County, they did that this morning.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5319
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: ATL IKE: Category 2 - Discussion

#10099 Postby Ptarmigan » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:21 pm

For anyone in Houston, here is a link to see what kind of sustained winds you will get based on zip code.
http://houstonhidefromthewind.org/
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34065
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#10100 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:22 pm

fox13weather wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tc_pages/tc08/ATL/09L.IKE/tc_ssmis/91h/2degreeticks/full/Latest.html

starting to wonder if this will even intensify at all.


He has had plenty of opportunity to do so today and could not. The environment ahead of the storm does not favor rapid intensification. Ike is yet another storm in a long list of storms where the intensity forecast was missed. until there is a better understanding of the energy transfer between the ocean and the storm there will be little improvment in the forecasts.


It is because of Ike himself - the inner eyewall not budging choked off the outer eyewall and they collapsed on each other...
0 likes   


Return to “2008”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests