cycloneye wrote:MBL wind = 118 knots. Oh my!
Cat 3 IMO..Book it..
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:MBL wind = 118 knots. Oh my!
JtSmarts wrote:We should start seeing some pressure drops sooner or later. It's been basically steady for most of the morning.
CronkPSU wrote:KHOU reporting lots of reports of people on rooves in Freeport or Galveston, didn't catch which city they were talking about
TCmet wrote:
Well, that map is only a 10% exceedance probability. So the likely value is lower, more like 20-25ft. But still.
Weatherfreak000 wrote:the reason people would argue is that this statment makes you sound ignorant of the elevated storm surge threat due to the size of the windfield, and will not be = to the average cat 2 storm, and sure if this were a three at it's current size it would be even worse, but what is the blessing between having your sea front home destoryed under 18 feet of water compared to 22 for those that "get" this storm. or for those that are stuck in 4 feet of water instead of 5 as they try to exit the barrier islands
I disagree...and think you need to drop this argument. The difference in effects if this storm was say, 120mph would be exponential for many. As you said, the huge windfield would come into play, extending much higher destructive winds not only in the center but to those around it, and as you said an increase of storm surge.
Frankly i'd argue your ignorant of my post...not the other way around. The difference may not mean much to people directly in the eyewall but could be a blessing to others around the area. In any case please drop this...no one is ignorant of storm surge.
I see many residents in the Texas area are very sensitive of the disaster nearing them, and that's understandable. Coming from someone who lived through Katrina I can completely relate.
Jijenji wrote:cycloneye wrote:MBL wind = 118 knots. Oh my!
What does this translate to surface wise?
fci wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:the reason people would argue is that this statment makes you sound ignorant of the elevated storm surge threat due to the size of the windfield, and will not be = to the average cat 2 storm, and sure if this were a three at it's current size it would be even worse, but what is the blessing between having your sea front home destoryed under 18 feet of water compared to 22 for those that "get" this storm. or for those that are stuck in 4 feet of water instead of 5 as they try to exit the barrier islands
I disagree...and think you need to drop this argument. The difference in effects if this storm was say, 120mph would be exponential for many. As you said, the huge windfield would come into play, extending much higher destructive winds not only in the center but to those around it, and as you said an increase of storm surge.
Frankly i'd argue your ignorant of my post...not the other way around. The difference may not mean much to people directly in the eyewall but could be a blessing to others around the area. In any case please drop this...no one is ignorant of storm surge.
I see many residents in the Texas area are very sensitive of the disaster nearing them, and that's understandable. Coming from someone who lived through Katrina I can completely relate.
I'm just shocked that this conversation can continue.
You are probably the ONLY ONE that could use the word "blessing" to those who are in the path of this storm and the impending surge that it is going to bring.
RL3AO wrote:I see NWS Houston backed off their statement.
"PERSONS NOT HEEDING EVACUATION ORDERS IN
SINGLE FAMILY ONE OR TWO STORY HOMES FACE THE POSSIBILITY OF DEATH."
RL3AO wrote:I see NWS Houston backed off their statement.
"PERSONS NOT HEEDING EVACUATION ORDERS IN
SINGLE FAMILY ONE OR TWO STORY HOMES FACE THE POSSIBILITY OF DEATH."
RL3AO wrote:I see NWS Houston backed off their statement.
"PERSONS NOT HEEDING EVACUATION ORDERS IN
SINGLE FAMILY ONE OR TWO STORY HOMES FACE THE POSSIBILITY OF DEATH."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests