Raebie wrote:45% of Galveston stayed.
Source? That is not what is being reported here. Maybe 20%-30%.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
vbhoutex wrote:Raebie wrote:45% of Galveston stayed.
Source? That is not what is being reported here. Maybe 20%-30%.
Weatherfreak14 wrote:Ptarmigan wrote:I think the Saffir-Simpsons scale needs some major changes. Hurricane Ike is a large Category 2 hurricane that will produce up to 25 foot high storm surge. I think there should be a scale based on how large the storm, not just the wind speed and central pressure.
we need the Saffir Simpsons scale and a surge scale, both to be used together in forcasting.
hial2 wrote:Any info on refineries flooding??..Here in NC gas prices have gone up 56 CENTS/gallon since this A.M. and there are long lines at gas stations..
funster wrote:vbhoutex wrote:Raebie wrote:45% of Galveston stayed.
Source? That is not what is being reported here. Maybe 20%-30%.
An official source on KHOU just said that. Not sure of his name. He spoke right after the Galveston mayor.
Raebie wrote:vbhoutex wrote:Raebie wrote:45% of Galveston stayed.
Source? That is not what is being reported here. Maybe 20%-30%.
Official dude speaking alongside the Mayor on KHOU.
Derek Ortt wrote:KWT wrote:superfly, all depends on where it makes landfall, the highest winds are a touch away from the eye thanks to the structure so as you say far east Texas and maybe far W/LA may take the main wind damage but thats really only a minor story compared with the mammoth surge that is more then likely going to rake the Galveston Bay.
Should be noted any towns along central, eastern Texas as well as W.La neare the coasts will be in major trouble and there will be huge damages, this will be a 10 billion dollar storm at least IMO.
closer to 50 billion
vbhoutex wrote:jinftl wrote:CNN met making some bold statements.....says looks like...and it could change...that worst east eyewall will go right of Shipping Channel sparing 25' surge...he did say could change
Surge or wind driven tide, whatever you want to call it, is already over 6 feet in places along Galveston Bay. Personally I would not put much faith in someone reporting from afar llike that.
Agua wrote:funster wrote:Raebie wrote:45% of Galveston stayed.
Where will they all go to stay safe?
Where'd they go in 1900?
Texas Snowman wrote:Source of 40% was Galveston city official in the city's official news conference.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests