Digital TV is here!

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145329
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Delay of digital TV switch to June 12

#21 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:45 pm

The House has defeated a bill to postpone the upcoming transition from analog to digital television broadcasting by four months to June 12.

House Republicans succeeded in scuttling a bill to delay the transition, which is scheduled for Feb. 17, less than two days after the Senate unanimously passed the plan.

The defeat is a setback for the Obama administration and Democrats on Capitol Hill, who fear too many Americans are not ready for the switchover.

The Nielsen Co. estimates more than 6.5 million U.S. households that rely on analog television sets to pick up over-the-air broadcast signals could see their TV sets go dark next month if the transition is not postponed.

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=6747758
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

Re: Delay of digital TV switch to June 12

#22 Postby jasons2k » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:45 pm

lurker_from_nc wrote:The U.S. House has defeated an attempt to delay the Feb. 17 transition to digital television signals.


Some sanity in DC is still left in the halls of Congress. Amazing.

It's time to move forward and free-up the bandwidth for other uses.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#23 Postby Dionne » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:05 pm

As of July '08 the estimated population was 303824640 in the U.S. If 6.5 million people still have the old tv's......that is just over 2%. You cannot kill a plan with this many years in the works for 2% of the population that did not comply. What was the new administration thinking?
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38090
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#24 Postby Brent » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:11 pm

House Republicans succeeded in scuttling a bill to delay the transition, which is scheduled for Feb. 17, less than two days after the Senate unanimously passed the plan.


I'm shocked, I thought for sure it'd pass, but definitely happy. It's long past time.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

Re: Delay of digital TV switch to June 12

#25 Postby CajunMama » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:41 pm

lurker_from_nc wrote:The U.S. House has defeated an attempt to delay the Feb. 17 transition to digital television signals.


Good for them! There was absolutely no reason to delay the transition. Like others have said everyone has known for a good while that it was coming.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145329
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#26 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:47 pm

Brent wrote:
House Republicans succeeded in scuttling a bill to delay the transition, which is scheduled for Feb. 17, less than two days after the Senate unanimously passed the plan.


I'm shocked, I thought for sure it'd pass, but definitely happy. It's long past time.


The bill needed two-thirds majority to approve.

House Republicans managed Wednesday to defeat the so-called "DTV delay" bill—and that means that the planned Feb. 17 date for the digital TV transition is still on, barring any last-minute maneuvering by Democrats and the Obama administration.

Sen. Jay Rockefeller's DTV delay bill—which included a series of compromises to mollify House and Senate Republicans, who've been resisting calls to push back the transition date—was passed by the Senate on Monday, and many observers (myself included) expected smooth sailing in the House.

But while the bill, which would have delayed the DTV transition date to June 12, needed a two-thirds majority to pass, according to the AP—and apparently, it fell short.

So now it's back to the drawing board for Democrats and President Obama, who have argued that too many people still aren't ready for the shutoff of analog TV signals. (The transition only affects those with analog TVs and over-the-air antennas; such viewers would need a $40-$60 DTV converter box to receive digital signals on their old TVs.)

Of course, that's a matter of debate: A recent report from Nielsen revealed that 5.7 percent of U.S. households aren't ready for the DTV transition, but some say that figure is inflated—and after all, it also means that 94.3 percent of the country is ready for digital TV.

Republicans in Congress have further argued that pushing back the DTV transtition date would only add to the confusion (no argument there, given the recent flood of TV spots announcing the Feb. 17 date), and that a delay would put an undue burden on those TV stations that have already started dismantling their analog TV equipment. Rockefeller's compromise bill included a provision allowing TV stations to make the jump to digital prior to the proposed June 12 deadline.

Meanwhile, a government coupon program that allows for two $40 DTV converter box coupons per household is still in disarray. The $1.5-billion program ran out of money earlier this month, although as unused coupons expire (after 90 days), more money flows back into the program. Still, about 2.6 million people are stuck on a waiting list, and while Obama's proposed economic stimulus plan includes $650 million in additional DTV coupon funding, there's no saying when—or if—the stimulus package will pass.

http://tech.yahoo.com/blogs/patterson/34955
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: Delay of digital TV switch to June 12

#27 Postby southerngale » Wed Jan 28, 2009 3:03 pm

lurker_from_nc wrote:The U.S. House has defeated an attempt to delay the Feb. 17 transition to digital television signals.

Good! Delaying it further would have been ridiculous.
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#28 Postby JonathanBelles » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:22 pm

YAY!!! I'm so glad we wont have to wait.
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#29 Postby senorpepr » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:46 pm

While I'm glad the house defeated this bill, there still is a long time between now and February 17th.

(Oh, how I miss the channels back in the states and the opportunities digital tv presented.)
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#30 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Jan 28, 2009 5:08 pm

glad it failed as well

TV is NOT a RIGHT. It is a luxury. If people have not made the switch, TOO BAD!
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#31 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:19 pm

In terms of return for the advertising dollar, low income single mothers with children probably make enough buying decisions to effect policy in some broadcast areas. Within this demographic I'm sure the percentage of families not ready for digital TV is much higher than 5 percent in many areas.

A station choosing an early transition to digital broadcast before their competition might be perceived to be violating some kind of "no child left behind endorsement"....

I'm curious whether the bills original proponents will think it important enough to rework for a re vote.
0 likes   

lurkey
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2381
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#32 Postby lurkey » Wed Jan 28, 2009 6:32 pm

My aunt is one of those 2% . . . she asked my mom about it in mid-January.. . I think I told her good luck on getting a coupon. . . . and that instead, she should get a new set (and I have no problem with helping pay for one) . . . btw the TV is not cable-ready. . .don't ask. . she hangs on to things forever until it breaks
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

#33 Postby somethingfunny » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:20 pm

When I read "House defeats delay".....well, I had to check the calendar. :double:

The converter boxes are getting hard to find in stores now. But one can be had for $40-$60. I bought the $60 version and I haven't got a clue what makes it better than a $40 model. But it does have a neat feature where you go Menu -> AutoTune -- and it will automatically find every channel that's currently coming through. During the days it finds 6, except when KXII's antenna is (frequently) malfunctioning in which case it finds 3....but some nights it finds upwards of 40. Unfortunately because of the time of night, 35 of them are infomercials. My friend has a 20-foot mast and we've raised stations out of Shreveport, Fort Smith, and Waco on it.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#34 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jan 28, 2009 8:55 pm

btw the TV is not cable-ready.


Lot of TV's out there are not. If she gets desperate the Dollar General store sells a balon that connects at the back of the tv where the bunny ears usually connect. Only costs a buck. You set the converter box to channel 3 or 4 and connect the box out into the balon.
0 likes   

User avatar
gtalum
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4749
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Bradenton, FL
Contact:

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#35 Postby gtalum » Wed Jan 28, 2009 11:00 pm

lurker_from_nc wrote:My aunt is one of those 2% . . . she asked my mom about it in mid-January.. . I think I told her good luck on getting a coupon. . . . and that instead, she should get a new set (and I have no problem with helping pay for one) . . . btw the TV is not cable-ready. . .don't ask. . she hangs on to things forever until it breaks


If she's concerned about cost and doesn't need or want the latest technology, she should check the local thrift stores (Salvation army, Goodwill, Habitat for Humanity) for a very cheap cable-ready tv.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: Digital TV switch will be on Febuary 17,House defeats delay

#36 Postby Category 5 » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:43 am

Thank god. I don't think I could've survived another 5 months of ads for this. :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145329
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Digital TV switch=Another crack for the June 12

#37 Postby cycloneye » Fri Jan 30, 2009 2:43 pm

We were happy that the House defeated the delay,but guess what,they will go again to the delay thing to June 12: :roll:


WASHINGTON - Congress is going to take another crack at delaying the analog TV shutdown by four months.

The House is expected to take a second run next week at a bill that would give consumers more time to prepare for the transition from analog to digital television broadcasts. If it passes, the bill would head to the president.

House Republicans on Wednesday defeated the proposal to delay the analog TV cutoff — currently mandated to be Feb. 17 — to June 12. But that vote happened under a special fast-track procedure that requires two-thirds support to pass.

While Wednesday's 258-168 tally failed to clear that threshold, it showed that House Democrats do have enough votes to pass the measure with a regular floor vote, which requires a simple majority. The bill is expected to go to the House floor during the middle of next week.

The Senate unanimously passed the bill to delay the transition Monday night, and then again Thursday night to incorporate minor changes

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28935913/
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#38 Postby senorpepr » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:13 pm

Exactly what I expected. This bill will pass this go-around.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#39 Postby CajunMama » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:15 pm

Why even have them vote the first time if they knew they could do this? Sheesh.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

Re:

#40 Postby Dionne » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:34 pm

senorpepr wrote:Exactly what I expected. This bill will pass this go-around.



Yepper....the numbers I just ran show an easy win. This some pretty slick political maneuvering happening.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests