2008 TCRs

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
margiek
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 9:50 pm

Re: 2008 TCRs=Hurricane Ike report is up

#101 Postby margiek » Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:18 pm

wxman57 wrote:
As of last week, Bill Read commented (at AMS meeting in Phoenix) that they were reviewing that observation to determine whether to recognize it as an accurate report. Eyewall ,mesovortices can produce extreme wind gusts, as was indicated by that dropsonde report of around 238 mph in Isabel in 2003. And it's also possible that the 212 mph gust occurred in a tornado. That wouldn't make Gustav a Cat 5, though.


Just wanted to mention that I saw a photo of the anemometer trace and the winds were not associated with a tornado. The gusts increased nonlinearly, and were from the north -- the western portion of the eyewall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Category 5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10074
Age: 35
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
Location: New Brunswick, NJ
Contact:

Re: Re:

#102 Postby Category 5 » Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:12 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:where do you get 100KT crazy?

If anything, it should have been 85-90KT based upon the SURFACE data


The maximum surface data would have been over a wildlife refuge, where there were no observations. Even if there were obs there, it would have been over water.

Flight-level winds peaked at 109 kt before landfall, translating to 98 kt at the surface (shown on the graphic at around 0400Z). Radar observations also go to the high 90s based on 6,500 feet.


If I remember correctly Ike wasn't exactly living up to the 90% rule for most of its time in the GOM.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#103 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:08 pm

if the high wind was valid, it could be the mesovortex, topography ehnamcement, or possibly a miniswirl within the eyewall, like what caused the damage in Andrew and Celia
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re:

#104 Postby Ptarmigan » Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:29 am

Derek Ortt wrote:if the high wind was valid, it could be the mesovortex, topography ehnamcement, or possibly a miniswirl within the eyewall, like what caused the damage in Andrew and Celia


Celia made landfall with 125 to 130 mph winds and had gusts of 175 mph.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#105 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:33 am

Ptarmigan wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:if the high wind was valid, it could be the mesovortex, topography ehnamcement, or possibly a miniswirl within the eyewall, like what caused the damage in Andrew and Celia


Celia made landfall with 125 to 130 mph winds and had gusts of 175 mph.


I believe gusts were 180 mph. I do think Celia was stronger at landfall though (a pressure of 945mb at Celia's size would be around 120-125 kt) especially considering it was bombing out like Charley was.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ptarmigan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5316
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:06 pm

Re: Re:

#106 Postby Ptarmigan » Sat Jan 24, 2009 12:35 am

CrazyC83 wrote:
I believe gusts were 180 mph. I do think Celia was stronger at landfall though (a pressure of 945mb at Celia's size would be around 120-125 kt) especially considering it was bombing out like Charley was.


True, considering Celia was a small storm. It had very strong winds, I believe one of the strongest winds besides Carla.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145631
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 2008 TCRs=Hurricane Gustav / Paloma reports are up

#107 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:44 am

Two more reports are up posted at the first post of thread and those are Hurricane Gustav and Hurricane Paloma.

About Gustav,they say the gust (184kts) in Western Cuba may be valid and the WMO (World Meteorogical Organization) is investigating the facts.It may be associated to a mesovortex combined with the terrain.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#108 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:05 am

Paloma no longer a major hurricane when it struck Cuba
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#109 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:14 am

From Gustav:

Hispañiola = Española + Hispaniola !! :D :D
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#110 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:49 am

My opinions on Gustav:

Haiti - Agreed with the intensity.

Jamaica - IMO it was a 65 kt hurricane when it hit Jamaica; the FL winds were 79 kt a couple hours earlier and it was still strengthening when it hit.

Cuba - There is some uncertainty there, but I agree in the 130 kt estimate as the Paso Real recordings were likely not representive of the intensity. The pressures I would bring down to 940mb at the Isle of Youth landfall and 938mb at the Cuba island landfall based on surface obs.

In the Gulf - Agreed in bringing down the intensity sooner. However, IMO it strengthened to 105 kt at 01/0000Z based on dropsonde and FL winds before weakening at a solid rate at landfall.

US landfall - Agreed in bringing it down to 90 kt (I would have considered 85 kt, but that would suggest that inland weakening was slow). I'd go with the observed pressure though and set it at 951mb.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#111 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:54 am

Derek Ortt wrote:Paloma no longer a major hurricane when it struck Cuba


Which makes sense since it was rapidly weakening at that point. I thought that 110 kt operational estimate was very generous.

I would have increased Paloma's peak intensity to 130 kt at 08/1200Z though since there was no Recon for several hours and Paloma was clearly weakening when the 142 kt FL winds was recorded. The Cayman Brac estimate also supports such since it is only slightly above standard elevation and most likely not the highest winds in the storm. Likewise, I would have brought down the pressure to 941mb based on the extrapolation of 939mb at the last run (which was likely a bit high) and the lack of pressure data afterward.

Notice in the BT that they mention the 2nd strongest November hurricane is subject to change - I guess they clearly know the 1932 hurricane was at least 140 kt at its peak.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#112 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:56 am

My guess is Fay will be last, due to the large number of data and the disputed status over Florida (some would suggest it was a hurricane, but the data does not support such).
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

Re:

#113 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:09 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:My opinions on Gustav:

Haiti - Agreed with the intensity.

Jamaica - IMO it was a 65 kt hurricane when it hit Jamaica; the FL winds were 79 kt a couple hours earlier and it was still strengthening when it hit.

Cuba - There is some uncertainty there, but I agree in the 130 kt estimate as the Paso Real recordings were likely not representive of the intensity. The pressures I would bring down to 940mb at the Isle of Youth landfall and 938mb at the Cuba island landfall based on surface obs.

In the Gulf - Agreed in bringing down the intensity sooner. However, IMO it strengthened to 105 kt at 01/0000Z based on dropsonde and FL winds before weakening at a solid rate at landfall.

US landfall - Agreed in bringing it down to 90 kt (I would have considered 85 kt, but that would suggest that inland weakening was slow). I'd go with the observed pressure though and set it at 951mb.


79KT at 850mb yields 63KT... a tropical storm at Jamaica
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145631
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 2008 TCRs=Tropical Storm Laura Report is up

#114 Postby cycloneye » Wed Feb 04, 2009 3:40 pm

At report,they changed to fully Tropical for Laura.Report is posted at first pòst of thread.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#115 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Feb 04, 2009 4:30 pm

Omar also up. Confirmed as a Category 4.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145631
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: 2008 TCRs=Tropical Storm Laura,H Omar Reports are up

#116 Postby cycloneye » Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:00 pm

The last report left in the Atlantic side is the Fay one.It will be a long one as it moved thru many land areas.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#117 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Feb 04, 2009 5:06 pm

I agree that Fay will be long and has a lot of data to sort out - plus the question over its peak intensity (the eye structure supports hurricane intensity, but surface obs were plentiful and do not quite - my guess is 60 kt for a peak intensity). I am guessing the two outstanding EPAC reports (Cristina and Julio) are next though.
0 likes   

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2276
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re: 2008 TCRs=Tropical Storm Laura,H Omar Reports are up

#118 Postby bvigal » Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:16 am

cycloneye wrote:The last report left in the Atlantic side is the Fay one.It will be a long one as it moved thru many land areas.

That's right, Luis. AND, it was a 'sudden' TS, because they couldn't find a closed low, but didn't fly during the time some of us in the "neighborhood" think it formed a TD, then weakened temporarily.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#119 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:23 am

Ike's TCR was recently updated (I just noticed it).

Damage increased to $28.2B total and 4 of the missing have been found alive. Best track was also adjusted slightly in and around Cuba.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#120 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:37 am

Paloma's TCR was also updated, but the changes were minor - mostly track changes to the remnant low. (I would have made an intensity change, increasing the peak intensity to 130 kt at 08/1500 based on SFMR and FL winds and trends, with a pressure of 941mb.)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Kohlecane, zzzh and 60 guests