Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- HURAKAN
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 46086
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
- Location: Key West, FL
- Contact:
Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Jackson flash to be re-examined
The US Supreme Court has ordered a re-examination of a ruling that threw out a fine over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during 2004's Super Bowl.
Federal regulators had initially fined CBS TV $550,000 (£368,000) in September 2004 for airing the glimpse of Jackson's breast during the broadcast.
But an appeals court quashed it in July last year saying the watchdog acted "arbitrarily" in issuing the fine.
Some 90 million viewers saw the incident during the half time show.
Jackson was performing alongside Justin Timberlake when he reached for her bra and the "malfunction" occurred.
About 542,000 complaints were received by broadcaster CBS.
Now the high court has directed the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia to consider reinstating the fine imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
The order follows a high court ruling last week that upheld the FCC's policy that subjects broadcasters to fines against even single uses of swear words on live television.
Last year, the appeals court threw out the fine against CBS, saying that as the incident lasted nine-sixteenths of one second, it should have been regarded as "fleeting".
The appeals court said CBS could not be held liable for the acts of Jackson and Timberlake - now that ruling will be reviewed in view of the Supreme Court's order in the case.
Lawyers for CBS had urged the Supreme Court to reject the FCC's appeal.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/e ... 032720.stm
The US Supreme Court has ordered a re-examination of a ruling that threw out a fine over Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during 2004's Super Bowl.
Federal regulators had initially fined CBS TV $550,000 (£368,000) in September 2004 for airing the glimpse of Jackson's breast during the broadcast.
But an appeals court quashed it in July last year saying the watchdog acted "arbitrarily" in issuing the fine.
Some 90 million viewers saw the incident during the half time show.
Jackson was performing alongside Justin Timberlake when he reached for her bra and the "malfunction" occurred.
About 542,000 complaints were received by broadcaster CBS.
Now the high court has directed the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia to consider reinstating the fine imposed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
The order follows a high court ruling last week that upheld the FCC's policy that subjects broadcasters to fines against even single uses of swear words on live television.
Last year, the appeals court threw out the fine against CBS, saying that as the incident lasted nine-sixteenths of one second, it should have been regarded as "fleeting".
The appeals court said CBS could not be held liable for the acts of Jackson and Timberlake - now that ruling will be reviewed in view of the Supreme Court's order in the case.
Lawyers for CBS had urged the Supreme Court to reject the FCC's appeal.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/e ... 032720.stm
0 likes
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Because the Supreme court can't possibly have anything better to do. 

0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 38090
- Age: 36
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Seriously... who even cares anymore?
This country has some screwed up priorities.
This country has some screwed up priorities.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
- Location: Fairfax, VA
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Brent wrote:Seriously... who even cares anymore?
This country has some screwed up priorities.
I agree. This shouldn't have been newsworthy when it happened, let alone five years later.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:27 pm
- Location: Big Pine Key, FL. (24.61N - 81.38W)
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Brent wrote:Seriously... who even cares anymore?
This country has some screwed up priorities.
Agreed. Non-issue. Carry on with something that matters.
0 likes
Re:
HURAKAN wrote::uarrow: They probably want to examine the flash in slow motion!!!

Question: CBS was fined for airing the incident but hasn't NatGeo (National Geographic Channel) occasionally shown bare breasted women dancing and so on in some African countries? Has NatGeo ever been fined for that?
0 likes
Re: Re:
abajan wrote:HURAKAN wrote:They probably want to examine the flash in slow motion!!!
![]()
Question: CBS was fined for airing the incident but hasn't NatGeo (National Geographic Channel) occasionally shown bare breasted women dancing and so on in some African countries? Has NatGeo ever been fined for that?
NatGeo and Discovery are cable stations, not subject to the FCC like CBS is.
0 likes
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Brent wrote:Seriously... who even cares anymore?
This country has some screwed up priorities.
Seriously. Greatest country on the globe still hung over a 1.3 second glimpse of a boob 5 years ago.
0 likes
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Super Bowl XXXVIII was very memorable and a good game. Too bad that the Janet Jackson flash overshadowed it.
0 likes
- Jinkers
- Category 1
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:34 pm
- Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida
- Contact:
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
I thought the whole thing was stupid-lol, a whole lot of fuss over nothing, I saw the halftime show, never thought anything about it, thought the halftime show wasn't very good to begin with-lol.
0 likes
- mf_dolphin
- Category 5
- Posts: 17758
- Age: 68
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 2:05 pm
- Location: St Petersburg, FL
- Contact:
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Does anybody remember that guy who ran naked across the field just before the halftime show began? I thought that was way more flagrant and offensive than whatever happened between Justin Timberlake and Janet Jackson that I wasn't paying attention to because their music is terrible....
and yet CBS had an equal amount on (non)control over both of them.
and yet CBS had an equal amount on (non)control over both of them.
0 likes
Someone should dig up the old thread we had on the original Janet Jackson/Justin Timberlake incident. It was pretty funny.......I think it was titled - did I just see a ......
I'm not very good at searching but always happy to nudge people in that direction if they have the time. I think either Chad or j started the original topic....
I do remember hearing about a streaker on the field!
*Edit* Wow we discussed this topic to death back then....LOL!!!
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24294&start=0
viewforum.php?f=6&st=0&sk=t&sd=d&start=17900
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24324&start=0
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24293
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24384
I'm not very good at searching but always happy to nudge people in that direction if they have the time. I think either Chad or j started the original topic....
I do remember hearing about a streaker on the field!
*Edit* Wow we discussed this topic to death back then....LOL!!!
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24294&start=0
viewforum.php?f=6&st=0&sk=t&sd=d&start=17900
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24324&start=0
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24293
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=24384
0 likes
Re: Janet Jackson flash to be re-examined
Occasionally, my Mom (God rest her soul) used to call me a boob and I didn't think anything of it until she called me that in front of my American cousin (Linda) while we were visiting family in the US (Ohio, to be specific) and my cousin burst out laughing. After she composed herself, she explained to me what a boob is.OpieStorm wrote:Brent wrote:Seriously... who even cares anymore?
This country has some screwed up priorities.
Seriously. Greatest country on the globe still hung over a 1.3 second glimpse of a boob 5 years ago.

The thing is, in Barbados boob doesn't mean that. To my knowledge, "boob" here simply means someone who says or does silly things.
Another word that means something totally different here than what it means in the US is "pooch". It took me years to get accustomed to hearing people refer to a dog by that term on TV shows. Here in Barbados, "pooch" means... well, one's rear end!

(Thankfully, Mom never called me a pooch.)
0 likes
- DanKellFla
- Category 5
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:02 pm
- Location: Lake Worth, Florida
I think when somebody is referred to as a "Boob" that phrase is derived from the behavior of a Booby, which is a bird.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booby
Before this incident, it was a secret that women have nipples. She did a great service to this country by
wait for it
*exposing the cover-up.*
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booby
Before this incident, it was a secret that women have nipples. She did a great service to this country by
wait for it
*exposing the cover-up.*

0 likes
Re:
In years past, Barbadians (a.k.a. Bajans) used to call Humming Birds "Dr. Boobies" (I'm clueless as to why we called them that) but I haven't heard anyone refer to them by that name lately. And a humming bird is nowhere near the size of the Booby pictured in your link.DanKellFla wrote:I think when somebody is referred to as a "Boob" that phrase is derived from the behavior of a Booby, which is a bird.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booby...
BTW, in Barbados what you guys call boobs, we (especially the older folk) call "bubbies".
0 likes
- Category 5
- Category 5
- Posts: 10074
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:00 pm
- Location: New Brunswick, NJ
- Contact:
Re:
mf_dolphin wrote:Anyone who thinks that it was a wardrobe malfunction needs to seek help. It was painfully obvious that it was scripted and planned.

THANK YOU!
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests