![Image](http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn/tc_pages/thumbs/tc09/EPAC/91E.INVEST/pacific/southern_hemisphere/geo/vis/2km/20090608.2030.goes11.x.vis2km.91EINVEST.20kts-1008mb-110N-1170W.88pc.jpg)
![Image](http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/htdocs_dyn/tc_pages/thumbs/tc09/EPAC/91E.INVEST/pacific/southern_hemisphere/geo/ir/1km/20090608.2030.goes11.x.ir1km.91EINVEST.20kts-1008mb-110N-1170W.100pc.jpg)
Call the fat lady, she may need to get ready if 91E doesn't revive itself back to life!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Good graphic Sandy.That shows it doesnt matter if things are slow now,it matters later.
I have a question about when was the latest date the first named storm in the EPAC formed?
cycloneye wrote:RL3AO,I found a much later date of the first named storm that formed.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/e_p ... index.html
RL3AO wrote:cycloneye wrote:RL3AO,I found a much later date of the first named storm that formed.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/e_p ... index.html
The EPac only has reliable stats going back to 1970, so thats where I started.
cycloneye wrote:RL3AO wrote:cycloneye wrote:RL3AO,I found a much later date of the first named storm that formed.
http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/e_p ... index.html
The EPac only has reliable stats going back to 1970, so thats where I started.
Oh ok thats true.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests