Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.
Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Vortex2, the much anticipated and highly publicized 5-week, 12 million dollar NOAA/University tornado research project, will end tomorrow - with only one modest tornado encounter to show for the large amount of effort and funding that went into this project...
Was it worth it?
Considering the very small number of data sets that have been gathered, I'd have to say no - unlike the annual Hurricane Research Division field program, that is part operational and part research, and acknowledges that some seasons will be more active than others, Vortex2 is a rare event (the first Vortex field program was many years ago, with Vortex3 scheduled for next summer - perhaps, considering Federal budget cutbacks), so, to come up with an almost empty sack must be discouraging for them, to say the least (even though TWC has tried very hard to pump as much excitement into "The Great Tornado Hunt" as possible)...
Again, was it worth the trouble and expense, considering individual teams gather many similar sets of tornado data every year?
My guess, as someone who worked in the business long ago, is that NOAA will have to justify further expense before an OMB subcommittee, before being allowed to continue with this project...
Frank2
Was it worth it?
Considering the very small number of data sets that have been gathered, I'd have to say no - unlike the annual Hurricane Research Division field program, that is part operational and part research, and acknowledges that some seasons will be more active than others, Vortex2 is a rare event (the first Vortex field program was many years ago, with Vortex3 scheduled for next summer - perhaps, considering Federal budget cutbacks), so, to come up with an almost empty sack must be discouraging for them, to say the least (even though TWC has tried very hard to pump as much excitement into "The Great Tornado Hunt" as possible)...
Again, was it worth the trouble and expense, considering individual teams gather many similar sets of tornado data every year?
My guess, as someone who worked in the business long ago, is that NOAA will have to justify further expense before an OMB subcommittee, before being allowed to continue with this project...
Frank2
0 likes
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Too bad they basically had to wait for the Spring semester to end. But next season will probably be busier than this season.
I understand chasing in the Plains, as far as few trees and mountains to obstruct the view, but are they certain the mini-tornado alley in Kentuckiana works the same way as the Plains? I wonder how applicable their work would be outside of the Plains.
I understand chasing in the Plains, as far as few trees and mountains to obstruct the view, but are they certain the mini-tornado alley in Kentuckiana works the same way as the Plains? I wonder how applicable their work would be outside of the Plains.
0 likes
- Jason Foster
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 44
- Age: 47
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:32 am
- Location: Gaithersburg, MD
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Yes, I agree with the three comments - incidentially, yesterday was pretty frustrating for them, with the TWC camerman spending what seemed forever with a closeup of - a stratus cloud...
My own sister lives only 40 miles west of yesterday's TWC/V2 field site, and I know for a fact that that area just does not see very many tornadoes - hail, yes, but tornadoes, per the rest of Colorado, are a somewhat rare event...
Ironic, too was the fact that the one tornado encounter was in another unlikely spot - Wyoming, so, proof again that Hollywood and real life are always two different things (no flying cows this time)...
Frank
My own sister lives only 40 miles west of yesterday's TWC/V2 field site, and I know for a fact that that area just does not see very many tornadoes - hail, yes, but tornadoes, per the rest of Colorado, are a somewhat rare event...
Ironic, too was the fact that the one tornado encounter was in another unlikely spot - Wyoming, so, proof again that Hollywood and real life are always two different things (no flying cows this time)...
Frank
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 11430
- Age: 34
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
- Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
I would agree that it was worth the effort - even though they only got to analyze one tornado, there were plenty of other rotating supercells that they probed, including yesterday evening's one in Colorado. Even an intense mesocyclone producing a wall cloud but not a tornado can provide a decent amount of data on the wind schematics involved in tornado formation. Although, if they do deploy Vortex 3 next year, hopefully there will be a little more activity so more data can be collected.
0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
To echo the above, it's just as important to get data on storms that DON'T produce tornadoes but should as it is to get data on the ones that do. Also Vortex is funded by a grant from the NSF not NWS.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3420
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
- Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
If I recall correctly, during Vortex1, wasn't the 1994 season a complete bust as well as much of the 1995 season, until the "wedge-fest" in Texas?
0 likes
- wall_cloud
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 401
- Age: 48
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:32 am
- Location: Bartlett, TN
- Contact:
1. the project for 2010 is not called Vortex3. Its phase 2 of Vortex2 (just like Vortex was a two year study).
2. I think it was definitely worth it. The coverage provided by media outlets (including and namley TWC) was invaluable. It provided a lot of information to those that are storm chasers and scientists. It may well result in donations and better coverage for next year's phase 2.
3. Null cases are just as important as tornado cases. They have to know why they DON'T form as well. I would love to have a larger dataset but it is what it is. We can't diminish its worth in hindsight. They still have one more day which includes a moderate risk in a high CAPE, high shear environment fairly close to home so they may get another one yet.
2. I think it was definitely worth it. The coverage provided by media outlets (including and namley TWC) was invaluable. It provided a lot of information to those that are storm chasers and scientists. It may well result in donations and better coverage for next year's phase 2.
3. Null cases are just as important as tornado cases. They have to know why they DON'T form as well. I would love to have a larger dataset but it is what it is. We can't diminish its worth in hindsight. They still have one more day which includes a moderate risk in a high CAPE, high shear environment fairly close to home so they may get another one yet.
0 likes
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Area centered on Wichita Falls is in a 5% tornado risk (and hatched hail and wind), maybe they get lucky their last day. They'd be near I-44 for the trip back to Norman, at any rate.
Awesome instability, but less than exciting low level winds, probably explain the difference between tornado and hail probs.

I'm waiting for regional 3 hour NAM to become available on the PSU web page.
AccuWeather EHI is highest at 4pm and 7 pm over the Panhandles. Best CAPE centered across the Red River in Texas and Oklahoma.
Amarillo would also be near an interstate heading to Norman.

Awesome instability, but less than exciting low level winds, probably explain the difference between tornado and hail probs.
I'm waiting for regional 3 hour NAM to become available on the PSU web page.
AccuWeather EHI is highest at 4pm and 7 pm over the Panhandles. Best CAPE centered across the Red River in Texas and Oklahoma.
Amarillo would also be near an interstate heading to Norman.
0 likes
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Aslkahuna wrote:To echo the above, it's just as important to get data on storms that DON'T produce tornadoes but should as it is to get data on the ones that do.
Sometimes the best science is done when ANY answer is interesting. Hopefully this point won't go overlooked in the media.
0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
The media as a general rule doesn't handle science well-heck they can't even get the facts straight half the time. Yes, 1994 was a total bust for Vortex 1 as was most of 1995. I remember that on June 1st 1994 we were on the same line of storms as they were but further south-neither we nor Vortex had anything really tornadic but we did get a decent storm with high winds and hail.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
This morning TWC showed a video of yesterday's very large wedge-tornado in Nebraska - in the very same area that V2 travelled just two weeks ago...
In fact, since the field program ended, there have been at least 10 tornadoes in the entire V2 area - the same areas they drove over the 5 weeks without seeing one ('cept the modest one they encountered in southeast Wyoming)...
I found it very interesting that others here mentioned that they had the same set of circumstances during the initial Vortex field program of the mid-1990's...
Poor Dr. Howie Bluestein must be wondering what's going on - still, back when we knew him, he was very successful in the field during his smaller field programs of the 1980's and earlier, though as others here mentioned, they did also want data from "negative" days as well as from active ones, though I'm sure they were hoping for more activity than they encountered...
Still, the timing is interesting to note - the entire 5 weeks fell between two fairly active periods (now, if it were 5 days that'd be another matter, but 5 weeks is a long time)...
Frank2
In fact, since the field program ended, there have been at least 10 tornadoes in the entire V2 area - the same areas they drove over the 5 weeks without seeing one ('cept the modest one they encountered in southeast Wyoming)...
I found it very interesting that others here mentioned that they had the same set of circumstances during the initial Vortex field program of the mid-1990's...
Poor Dr. Howie Bluestein must be wondering what's going on - still, back when we knew him, he was very successful in the field during his smaller field programs of the 1980's and earlier, though as others here mentioned, they did also want data from "negative" days as well as from active ones, though I'm sure they were hoping for more activity than they encountered...
Still, the timing is interesting to note - the entire 5 weeks fell between two fairly active periods (now, if it were 5 days that'd be another matter, but 5 weeks is a long time)...
Frank2
0 likes
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 36
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Frank2 wrote:This morning TWC showed a video of yesterday's very large wedge-tornado in Nebraska - in the very same area that V2 travelled just two weeks ago...
In fact, since the field program ended, there have been at least 10 tornadoes in the entire V2 area - the same areas they drove over the 5 weeks without seeing one ('cept the modest one they encountered in southeast Wyoming)...
I found it very interesting that others here mentioned that they had the same set of circumstances during the initial Vortex field program of the mid-1990's...
Poor Dr. Howie Bluestein must be wondering what's going on - still, back when we knew him, he was very successful in the field during his smaller field programs of the 1980's and earlier, though as others here mentioned, they did also want data from "negative" days as well as from active ones, though I'm sure they were hoping for more activity than they encountered...
Still, the timing is interesting to note - the entire 5 weeks fell between two fairly active periods (now, if it were 5 days that'd be another matter, but 5 weeks is a long time)...
Frank2
If the mere presence of a Vortex field research program is able to prevent tornado formation, then I'd say it's worth the expense to keep them around all year-long!
0 likes
- Jevo
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1729
- Age: 47
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: The Flemish Cap
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
How does this compare with the amount of time that that the TVN and TIV teams stay out? Reed seems to grab a bunch of footage each year, but then again he lives in T-Alley
0 likes
- wall_cloud
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 401
- Age: 48
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 7:32 am
- Location: Bartlett, TN
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
Reed also did not have to coordinate with 40+ additional vehicles like the V2 armada.
0 likes
- Jevo
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1729
- Age: 47
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
- Location: The Flemish Cap
- Contact:
Re: Vortex2 - Was It Worth It?
wall_cloud wrote:Reed also did not have to coordinate with 40+ additional vehicles like the V2 armada.
Very true... I could have swore that the TIV and ROTATE teams only had about 4 or 5 cars with them on their chases.... TIV + Doghouse DOW + Scout
I guess that changed immensly when V2 started
0 likes
Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: txtwister78, wxman22 and 66 guests