ATL: TROPICAL STORM BILL (03L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#981 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:02 am

does anybody think that the models are all thrown off on 90l because of td2
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: Invest 90L

#982 Postby Ivanhater » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:05 am

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#983 Postby HouTXmetro » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:06 am

Hurricaneman wrote:does anybody think that the models are all thrown off on 90l because of td2


I doubt it. IMO TD2 will pave the way for 90L to recurve by exploiting a weakness in the High.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#984 Postby Hurricaneman » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:09 am

HouTXmetro wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:does anybody think that the models are all thrown off on 90l because of td2


I doubt it. IMO TD2 will pave the way for 90L to recurve by exploiting a weakness in the High.


that would mean the gfs is wrong and after looking at all the features the gfs is wrong and the euro is probably closer to what will happen
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#985 Postby bob rulz » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:39 am

Very impressive how much it's improved in the last few hours. Definitely a tropical depression at 5am.

Now the question is - which storm will become Ana first? I still think it will be TD2 but 90L got its act together a lot quicker than I expected.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#986 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:52 am

Very interesting to see the GFDL heading more north, indeed the models have trended a little north on the 0z run towards last nights 0z ECM.

Still have to question it IMO as Derek has said.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#987 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:54 am

Looking good, no doubt IMO that this is TD3 now, models have shifted north overnight but as Derek said I'm pretty sure thats a bit of an odd move.
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 90L

#988 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:57 am

0z EURO recurves big time out to sea....EURO must just be getting warmed up!?!
0 likes   


User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#990 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:00 am

Its very interesting but I think whats interesting is the models are soooo slow with this systems forward speed, only GFS seems to be close really to be honest.

Anyway every models has shifted northwards towards the ECM it seems.

The models have got a stronger weakness now as well however we shall see what happens, I've seen utterly time and time and time again the models underdo ridging. Frances, Ivan, Dean, Ike to name just a few...
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#991 Postby Wx_Warrior » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:02 am

Im a big EURO junkie/flukie (ask ROCK)....but EURO must be getting warmed up....? Or gonna make the others look stupid.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#992 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:05 am

Well look how slow it is wxwarrior...

It has this storm at 43W at 72hrs...so that means its only going to move about 12 degree in 72hrs and given this is already moving at 15kts roughly it seems like the ECM is wayyyy to slow.

I've noticed the more NE runs tend to be the slower runs, the 12z ECM was closer to the truth and that shifted SW, but the 0z run is somehow even slower again.
0 likes   

paintplaye
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:25 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#993 Postby paintplaye » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:06 am

Wx_Warrior wrote:Im a big EURO junkie/flukie (ask ROCK)....but EURO must be getting warmed up....? Or gonna make the others look stupid.


Yea well some model is going to do terrible with this storm. It is going to either be the euro that will be way off or the rest of the models.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: Re:

#994 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:06 am

cycloneye wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:one other thing, GFS is probably too slow initially. This could be closer to 43-44W not the ~41 the GFS has it at in 48 hours


And that is why the ECMWF recurves as is slow.

No, nothing to do with being slow or fast. ECM is not that much slower than GFS, and the little slower motion the former does show is due to the same reason that it shows recurvature - a stronger weakness that slows the system down. Someone needs to fly a Gulfstream jet out there to get some synoptic data, sad to see such different depictions of the Azores-Bermuda 500mb ridge just 72 hr out (first image GFS, second image ECM)...

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#995 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:11 am

Well regardless all the models are going to be too slow, given its moving at 15kts its going to have to slow down pretty soon if its going to not make it to past 43W by 72hrs, probably slow down to about 11kts which whilst possible doesn't seem that likely given a strengthening ridge is aloft at least for now.

I suspect by 72hrs this will be knocking on the door of 50W I reckon...
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

Re: ATL: Invest 90L Models

#996 Postby Thunder44 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:15 am

The 0z/15 Ukmet. Maybe a little further north by the end here. But still moves across the NE Leeward islands:

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/UKHE ... kloop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#997 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:17 am

Yeah a little further north but not much.

By the way interestingly from all my studying of the models here in the UK, the UKMO tends to handle the subtropical high ridges probably the best out of all the models, its no where near as good with low systems for some reason but Id put even more confidence in it then the UKMO when it comes to upper high strength.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#998 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:23 am

One more thought - the 0Z GFS has trended more towards the ECM, for sures. Keeps a ctrl ATL ULL amplified a little longer like the ECM. 7 times out of 10 models will underdo the strength of a ridge, but those 3/10 times it doesn't, it's usually because models weaken and/or lift out a UL too early, and the UL carves out a stronger weakness than anticipated (remember Ernesto?). Some food for thought.

Additionally, remember the symbiotic relationship TC outflow and ULL's share: they invigorate each other. If TD2/Ana does start dancing with the ctrl ATL ULL, the latter will certainly stay longer than models indicate.

Now, I'm still not favoring one solution over another, but it's just something to keep in the back of the head.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#999 Postby KWT » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:30 am

Its a hard call, no doubt the models have adjusted northwards but some models are without a doubt too slow with the forward motion which would surely have a big impact if that were the case...
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6108
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Re:

#1000 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:42 am

wxmann_91 wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
Derek Ortt wrote:one other thing, GFS is probably too slow initially. This could be closer to 43-44W not the ~41 the GFS has it at in 48 hours


And that is why the ECMWF recurves as is slow.

No, nothing to do with being slow or fast. ECM is not that much slower than GFS, and the little slower motion the former does show is due to the same reason that it shows recurvature - a stronger weakness that slows the system down. Someone needs to fly a Gulfstream jet out there to get some synoptic data, sad to see such different depictions of the Azores-Bermuda 500mb ridge just 72 hr out (first image GFS, second image ECM)...

Image

Image

well sure it has to do with speed. Lets say a weakness is forecast to develop in a certain area in 2 days to the NW of the storm currently. A quick-moving storm is more likely to pass the weakness before it becomes strong enough to lift the storm northward, whereas, if it were to move more slowly, it would allow more time for the weakness to grow, gaining more influence over the storm, thus turning it more northward. In addition, strength is also a factor. As mentioned earlier, the stronger it gets the further west it will go in this case. Assuming it continues to develop the way it is now, and based on current speed/heading, a westward track still seems most likely.

I dont know if this is true or not, but the models may be initializing td2/ana wrong, not recognizing the fact that it has regenerated, and seeing it more as a developing weakness in the ridge. Hypothetically, if there were a weakness so close to 90L at this time, steering would probably be light and a northerly influence would begin to affect the storm. However, this is not the case and 90L is moving at a brisk pace to the west, something that the models don't currently understand. Could this be the source of the error? (sorry if my wording is iffy at parts)
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests