ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION DANNY (05L)

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
The Eye Wall

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#221 Postby The Eye Wall » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:28 pm

ROCK wrote:it eating it lunch alright but it also is helping sustain the convection. Long enough I supposed to get a LLC out of it by tomorrow IMO.....

some nice warm water to work with as it gets closer to FL...

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL


Well Paul, I've said it once and I'll say it again--you stir a cup of coffee long enough at the top, the circulation will eventually reach the bottom. Worth watching for sure.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#222 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:43 pm

The Eye Wall wrote:
ROCK wrote:it eating it lunch alright but it also is helping sustain the convection. Long enough I supposed to get a LLC out of it by tomorrow IMO.....

some nice warm water to work with as it gets closer to FL...

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL


Well Paul, I've said it once and I'll say it again--you stir a cup of coffee long enough at the top, the circulation will eventually reach the bottom. Worth watching for sure.




you would be right bro.....looking at the vis tonight it does look like a mid level circulation at around 20N.... North convection tops shearing out to the northeast but the burst to the south not so much, IMO. Looks like that ULL is weakening.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/carb/loop-wv.html

steering
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... 8dlm1.html
0 likes   

The Eye Wall

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#223 Postby The Eye Wall » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:46 pm

The outflow is also a bit more pronounced this evening on the north side of the blob. Still has a ways to go. No LLC, no storm. Plain as that.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#224 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:51 pm

This disturbance is like Ana and Claudette combined. Ana's ULL that tore it apart and the wave that formed Claudette's persistence. I guess the ULL will suspend development for now but the energy is definitely there waiting to organize.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#225 Postby boca » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:02 pm

We can't be so sure of the track as the models show a recurve.It looks like a slowly organizing mess that might go further west than we think, maybe between 75 and 80w.On the water vapor it looks like the trough is splitting the northern end moving NE and the other area in the Gulf moving WSW.I think the models will adjust tomorrow once somthing forms. I think it will recurve but alot closer to Florida than 70w.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#226 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:06 pm

boca wrote:We can't be so sure of the track as the models show a recurve.It looks like a slowly organizing mess that might go further west than we think, maybe between 75 and 80w.On the water vapor it looks like the trough is splitting the northern end moving NE and the other area in the Gulf moving WSW.I think the models will adjust tomorrow once somthing forms. I think it will recurve but alot closer to Florida than 70w.


exactly.. the models are clearly not handling the weak trough and the strong ridge moving in .. also the initial motion is wrong.
12z ukmet is more probable.. the system is not going strengthen that rapidly and a more westward track is likely.. also if it keeps a speed higher than forecast for any substantial length of time, we will see a system entering the bahamas in 3 days.


well make that 2 days for the bahamas not three.. bad calculation..
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#227 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:08 pm

You seldom see red IR like that in this climatology that doesn't develop. Wait until it gets past Bill's wake and the ULL:



Image
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6367
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#228 Postby boca » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:14 pm

I think if their was a center its down by 18n and 60w just SW of the reds in the IR sat that sanibel gave us.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: Invest 92L

#229 Postby Sanibel » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:16 pm

We have plenty of time to see on the visible satellite tomorrow. Q-Scat doesn't lie.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#230 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 10:16 pm

No center anywhere.... a center can form within any deep convection.. but will likely form with the greatest convergence and vorticity which is farther to the south and west..
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#231 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:05 pm

00Z GFS doesn't waste time depicting a low.

18h:
Image

72h:
Image
0 likes   

MWatkins
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2574
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 7:51 pm
Location: SE Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#232 Postby MWatkins » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:18 pm

I think there are two problems with the 0Z GFS.

1. It develops/initializes 92L too far north. It has the 500mb reflection up north of 20 within the first 24 hours, which seems unlikely.

2. It is too progressive with the SE US upper low that turned Bill. The Cut off low gets picked up in the model and drags across 92L, turning it out to sea (probably).

The Euro leaves it hanging back until the weekend, which lets 92L approach the coast in the model run (so does NOGAPS).

Watch the upper low progged to sink down to the northern Gulf. That's the key I think to 92L becoming a problem or not...

MW
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#233 Postby fci » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:23 pm

If anything develops as far North as 20 and East as 60, I have serious doubts that it would gets as far west as South Florida. There has to be a monster ridge suppressing a system to the west (or like Ike last year to the WSW). I don't see that happening.

As for whether IF something develops it goes up the Mid-Atlantic coast, I can't say. But, based on my recollection of history; IF 92L develops, it will not be South Florida bound.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#234 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:24 pm

MWatkins wrote:I think there are two problems with the 0Z GFS.

1. It develops/initializes 92L too far north. It has the 500mb reflection up north of 20 within the first 24 hours, which seems unlikely.

2. It is too progressive with the SE US upper low that turned Bill. The Cut off low gets picked up in the model and drags across 92L, turning it out to sea (probably).

The Euro leaves it hanging back until the weekend, which lets 92L approach the coast in the model run (so does NOGAPS).

Watch the upper low progged to sink down to the northern Gulf. That's the key I think to 92L becoming a problem or not...

MW


exactly.. also mike the UKMET is in line with the Euro... http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/UKTR ... kloop.html

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

#235 Postby btangy » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:30 pm

The forecasted upper level low sitting along the Gulf coast reminds me of the upper level pattern that occurred back in May that lasted for a couple of weeks (wreaking boredom on the Vortex 2 project). I also think the GFS is a bit too progressive opening this low up and ejecting it NE and the culprit might be some grid scale feedback in the Midwest with a persistent bullseye of convection that induces a bit of a kink in the 500mb flow. Otherwise, there's no real kick in the jet stream that would cause this to happen until later in the week when the next system drops down from C Canada.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#236 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:38 pm

btangy wrote:The forecasted upper level low sitting along the Gulf coast reminds me of the upper level pattern that occurred back in May that lasted for a couple of weeks (wreaking boredom on the Vortex 2 project). I also think the GFS is a bit too progressive opening this low up and ejecting it NE and the culprit might be some grid scale feedback in the Midwest with a persistent bullseye of convection that induces a bit of a kink in the 500mb flow. Otherwise, there's no real kick in the jet stream that would cause this to happen until later in the week when the next system drops down from C Canada.


yeah you can clearly see the upper low dropping SW, which its not likely to be moving out anytime soon. the weak low noted on the latest surface analysis,currently over the Georgia/Alabama border is also dropping to the SW into the northern gulf and the weak trough over florida is falling apart leaving the lower florida peninsula in light winds while the northern half is under ene winds around the ridge that is slipping off the east coast which will likely keep any system farther west than the current gfs and bam's. like watkins said the euro, and nogaps along with the ukmet keep the ridging in place longer although the nogaps is slightly recurving east of the euro and UKmet.
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#237 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:39 pm

Canadian at 72h:

Image

Brings it into ~Wilimington, NC at 108h (Saturday morning).
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

#238 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:44 pm

I feel a rant coming on. I'm sorry but I am going to have to formally complain about these model output maps. They are nearly impossible to read. Each model has its own different map and map projection, and they are absolutely LOADED with thick contour lines that completely obscure the landmasses on the map. These things are downright archaic. Maybe someone should spend a couple of thousand government dollars and have some college sophomore graphic designer come up with an output that is readable. Thank you for your time.

8-)
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#239 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:52 pm

GP...don't worry about the CMC.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: Invest 92L - Computer Models

#240 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:53 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:GP...don't worry about the CMC.


Look, the GFS is the only comprehensible model output I know of in the tropical world. It's not just the CMC. It's like, everything. But alas, I'm not one to worry, anyway.Thank you for your support! :-0
0 likes   


Return to “2009”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests