theavocado wrote:ozonepete wrote:As I was saying yesterday, these two looked like they might do the FUJIWHARA EFFECT. Now it's pretty certain. I'm a little surprised that the JTWC hasn't used the term, since it's definitely the proper name for it.
I think JTWC hasn't used the term because they don't think the two systems will orbit around each other. The systems will come close and Melor will effect Parma's track, but since they will not come close enough to orbit, Fujiwhara is not the correct term. In this case, the two correct terms are "Binary Interaction" or "Direct Cyclone Interaction".
Thank you! I went and looked it up, and found a good deal of scientific literature on this. They are using "binary interaction" because they are talking about the physical effects rather than the cause. So any interaction, no matter how small, IS being caused at least in part by the fujiwhara effect, but also the environmental flow field. It's a combination of the two that must be considered. And regardless, the resulting motion is called a binary interaction and that's what the JTWC is interested in talking about - the resulting motion, not the theory behind it. Here's the opening paragraph from a very good paper on it:

Since they are less than 7 degrees apart in latitude, the FE should be dominant after they are less than 800 miles apart, right?