
Any takers?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
cctxhurricanewatcher wrote:This afternoon's AFD's should be very interesting...........
wxgirl69 wrote:If I wanted to take a new years trip to find snow in Texas. Where should I go?
Portastorm wrote:cctxhurricanewatcher wrote:This afternoon's AFD's should be very interesting...........
As it turns out, they weren't. At least in my opinion. Nearly every WFO is hesitant to say much probably due to model variability beyond 72 hours.
But I will use this post to critique my own local WFO (Austin/San Antonio) who is way too warm for Christmas Day and Dec. 26th. "Five to 10 degrees below normal." Ha! We'll see about that.
orangeblood wrote:This looks like a pronounced split flow pattern setting up next week. This pattern usually is conducive for snow storms across north and north central Texas. As long as we have the cold air in place, someone should be getting a decent amount of snow out of this pattern. More than 24 hours prior to the event, they are normally hard to predict exactly who will be getting hit. If we can hold this pattern in place, we could be talking about not just one event but several occurring over the next 2 weeks (similar to January 1978). Exciting pattern to say the least.
Analogs to look at would be Nov. 12, 1976, Jan. 1, 1978, and Jan. 21, 1983
TrekkerCC wrote:After checking out the 18z GFS run for 12/29 period, it appears to show some light precipitation foretasted around the Central Texas area, and then it fizzles out. There is a upper-level disturbance crossing North Texas during the Monday/Tuesday period, but GFS might be projecting that there won't be a lot of moisture around. Curious as the ECMWF is showing abundant QPF (I have access to ECMWF QPF from a paysite) associated with this disturbance in its 12z run. I think we may have a shot for a winter weather event/storm next week, but I wouldn't be very confident yet. If the GFS and ECMWF consistently shows this event happening on Tuesday into this weekend, such as it did for several days before the Houston snowstorm, then I will VERY interested.
Ntxw wrote:TrekkerCC wrote:After checking out the 18z GFS run for 12/29 period, it appears to show some light precipitation foretasted around the Central Texas area, and then it fizzles out. There is a upper-level disturbance crossing North Texas during the Monday/Tuesday period, but GFS might be projecting that there won't be a lot of moisture around. Curious as the ECMWF is showing abundant QPF (I have access to ECMWF QPF from a paysite) associated with this disturbance in its 12z run. I think we may have a shot for a winter weather event/storm next week, but I wouldn't be very confident yet. If the GFS and ECMWF consistently shows this event happening on Tuesday into this weekend, such as it did for several days before the Houston snowstorm, then I will VERY interested.
The 6z and 18z runs imo aren't very reliable as they only extend data from the other two (fun to look at). 0z and 12z is where new data is initiated and are better trusted.
amawea wrote:This discussion out of Springfield, Mo kinda confuses me. The part about a stronger surface low developing over South Arkansas, strenthening and moving north into Missouri just doesn't sound right with the pending forecast for North Arkansas being what they are.
wxgirl69 wrote:amawea wrote:Here are the latest model runs....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
..........
LMAO!!!! That is the most entertaining forecast I have seen in a long time.
Ntxw wrote:wxgirl69 wrote:amawea wrote:Here are the latest model runs....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
..........
LMAO!!!! That is the most entertaining forecast I have seen in a long time.
Not to mention quite accurate xD
Users browsing this forum: wxman22 and 5 guests