Macrocane wrote:More active than JB's forecast? or just more active than last year?
More active than last year.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Macrocane wrote:More active than JB's forecast? or just more active than last year?
Ptarmigan wrote:I have a feeling this season will be more active.
Blown Away wrote:Link to Joe:
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/s ... 2010-1.asp
1964, 1995, 1998, and 2005, per Joe! Bold prediction and not good for SFL!
Blown Away wrote:Link to Joe:
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/s ... 2010-1.asp
1964, 1995, 1998, and 2005, per Joe! Bold prediction and not good for SFL!
wxman57 wrote:Blown Away wrote:Doesn't "weakening trade winds" imply a weak Bermuda High? I guess Joe thinks many potential landfalls in the GOM rather than the EC because a weak Bermuda High would allow for more recurves?
That is true, the weaker Bermuda High is why the trade wind speeds are currently low. Weaker low-level shear, more moisture, and a very warm ocean between Africa and the Caribbean should lead to a much more active Cape Verde year. And the farther east a storm develops (with a weaker high to the north), the more likely it will recurve either east of the Caribbean or east of the U.S.
However, the low pressures and very favorable (potentially) conditions also may extend into the NW Caribbean. Any development there would very likely threaten the U.S. So maybe half the storms will track safely out to sea. The other half - watch out!
KWT wrote:Surpising more of the mass media haven't picked up on the forecast of a very active season, esp since they seem to enjoy ramping up hurricane season.
cycloneye wrote:KWT,I suspect that the CSU April 7th forecast will get plenty of media attention.
wxman57 wrote:cycloneye wrote:KWT,I suspect that the CSU April 7th forecast will get plenty of media attention.
I did get a chance to talk to Phil Klotzbach last Thursday at the NHC. He certainly has seen what the European model is forecasting as far as Atlantic Basin pressures for July-September. I think the term "holy cow" came up. His December prediction was from 11-16 named storms. He's getting more confident that the number will be closer to the upper end of that range. He didn't disagree that there could be even greater than 16 named storms. In any case, looks like a quite active season in store for 2010.
micktooth wrote:Blown Away wrote:Link to Joe:
http://www.accuweather.com/blogs/news/s ... 2010-1.asp
1964, 1995, 1998, and 2005, per Joe! Bold prediction and not good for SFL!
Yikes, looks like it might be active. Does Joe indeed foresee a year like 2005? I didn't see it mentioned in the article. 2005 is the reason I'm now living in Denver and not New Orleans!
Texas Snowman wrote:
I didn't see 2005 mentioned either. Already a bold enough prediction, but to even add a reference to 2005 into the mix, as was mentioned elsewhere in this thread, "HOLY COW!!!!"
OuterBanker wrote:One other omen. This years list is 2004's name list. Four names were retired that year Charlie, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne.
Users browsing this forum: Blown Away, Cpv17, gib, StormWeather and 85 guests