ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
IamKelleyP
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 6:30 pm

Re:

#321 Postby IamKelleyP » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:04 pm

psyclone wrote:even if this system is briefly named and then falls apart, the fact that it formed at that latitude and this time of year serves as the tropical equivalent of a canary in a coal mine. I think this duck is about to quack.


This is my fear too!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#322 Postby KWT » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:04 pm

rd261 wrote:It certainly has an impressive structure, and more impressive still is the fact that it has been a pretty consistent storm. However, I do have my doubts on development due to being so early in the season.
.


Yep thats quite understandable, but really the conditions out in the MDR zone right now below say 13-15N are pretty exceptional for the time of year and certainly are a long way in advance of what you'd normally find in a typical June.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re:

#323 Postby jinftl » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:05 pm

Completely agree....if we see systems in the deep tropics having the ability to slowly organize when climatology says it is too soon to be looking that far east in the Atlantic, that would seem to indicate that all the talk of a busy season, of conditions being much more favorable overall than last season, etc, is not off base at all.

If we can see a td develop by mid-June with less struggle than systems saw in the same region last September, that says alot. Will this system be an Ivan...doubtful....but what is coming down the pike in 8 or 12 weeks if this is what we see now?

psyclone wrote:I've been watching 92L develop with a simultaneous sense of intrigue and trepidation. even if this system is briefly named and then falls apart, the fact that it formed at that latitude and this time of year serves as the tropical equivalent of a canary in a coal mine. I think this duck is about to quack.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#324 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:05 pm

Thanks for the invitations but let's not clog up this thread with it. Users are trying to get important information about this system. There is a specific thread for inviting new people.
0 likes   
Michael

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#325 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:05 pm

rd261 wrote:Hello fellow storm chasers

I have been lurking in this forums since 2004 but never commented. I decided to do so now because I have been obsessed with this storm since it came out of the African continent. Anyways, I have really enjoyed the forums for the past couple of years and hope to continue doing so for many more seasons to come.

By the way wxman57, Im a fan :lol: I have learned lots from your discussions.



Welcome, rd!
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#326 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:07 pm

I agree with duck quack post.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#327 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:10 pm

NOLA2010 wrote:First time poster, but been lurking around for a while and finally decided to join after the invite to the guests from Hurricane Andrew. I have been following 92L since it started and i doubted it at first, but now i am not sure. I think we have TD 1 on our hands but not sure about TS Alex. But we will see!

anyways thanks and this is a great and informative site. keep up the good work.


Welcome to storm2k. You can learn a lot here and the people are great. Have fun.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#328 Postby hurricaneCW » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:12 pm

The thing is we could have a hyperactive season but have it be deemed a quite season. If we get a lot of storms that develop out of these African waves, they will most likely develop quickly due to very favorable conditions expected, gain latitude, and curve out to sea. I think we may see a season like 1995, very active but a lot of recurves.

I don't think we will see as many landfalls as JB predicts and definitely not as many as in 2005. This wave may be a precursor to a very active hurricane season but it may also be a precursor to a lot of out to sea storms.
Last edited by hurricaneCW on Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#329 Postby sponger » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:13 pm

Welocme back everyone! Being such a large circulation, if this gets 3 days under favorable conditions it may take alot of adversity later to wind this down. The more latitude it gains the worst later conditions will be. Odds are against it but I remember 2004 storms surviving everthing that was thrown at them. Its going to be one hell of a season!
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145306
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#330 Postby cycloneye » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:14 pm

In case anyone missed it,here is the video that Joe Bastardi made this afternoon about 92L.

http://hurricane.accuweather.com/hurricane/index.asp
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#331 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:15 pm

Well I have to admit, quite a system here. Is it Jun 13th or Sept 13? Anyway, I see shear strong shear out ahead of it around 50W from the TUTT axis. I think it is going to hit this shear and get ripped apart. GFS still doesn't like this system as do most models. I will go with the model consensus and call for it to open back up into a wave in the long-term. Until it hits the shear I must say it may become a name system. But probably won't be a named system for very long though.
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:20 pm, edited 4 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#332 Postby sponger » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:17 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:The thing is we could have a hyperactive season but have it be deemed a quite season. If we get a lot of storms that develop out of these African waves, they will most likely develop quickly due to very favorable conditions expected, gain latitude, and curve out to sea. I think we may see a season like 1995, very active but a lot of recurves.

I don't think we will see as many landfalls as JB predicts and definitely not as many as in 2005. This wave may be a precursor to a very active hurricane season but it may also be a precursor to a lot of out to sea storms.


1995 was a fantastic season, for surfers and coastal dwellers. Lots of action and very little damage. I believe it was Eduardo, felix and gustav? Lots of swell and little damage. Lets all pray all this heat gets moved through the central Atlantic and not The Gulf and Eastern Seabord.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#333 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:20 pm

wow, I'm amazed at all these new people joining! I don't even think I ever remember this many new folks ever posting the same day. This is great! Welcome aboard all!!!!!


Now back to Invest 92L
I think it will still make it to depression status before the shear shreds it, but the organization should be slow based on the current convection activity,
and also because of the broad nature of it.
Last edited by ConvergenceZone on Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#334 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:21 pm

I have noticed quite a few people calling for Invest 92L to become a TD or TS by this time or that time. While this is obviously a possibility we must ask that when one is posting something like this that you back your post up with some sound meteorological reasoning. Just stating that you think it will happen is not sound meteorological reasoning. Neither is just saying I agree with the previous post. If this type of posting continues, which I tend to define as -removed- staff will begin to give out warnings and or suspensions as warranted. THIS IS THE ONLY WARNING THAT WILL BE POSTED ABOUT THIS.
We are not trying to stifle discussion. We are trying to encourage it. But we want the discussions to have some merit behind the "forecast".
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re:

#335 Postby Blown Away » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:22 pm

gatorcane wrote:Well I have to admit, quite a system here. Is it Jun 13th or Sept 13? Anyway, I see shear strong shear out ahead of it around 50W from the TUTT axis. I still think it is going to hit this shear and get ripped apart. GFS still doesn't like this system as do most models. I will go with the model consensus. I still will go with this forecast, however, until it hits the shear I must say it may become a name system. But probably won't be a named system for very long with the shear.


92L is looking great rate now and that shear is days a way and as KWT said it could punch through and emerge in a low shear environment depending on the track 92L takes.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#336 Postby KWT » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:23 pm

gatorcane wrote:Well I have to admit, quite a system here. Is it Jun 13th or Sept 13? Anyway, I see shear strong shear out ahead of it around 50W from the TUTT axis. I think it is going to hit this shear and get ripped apart. GFS still doesn't like this system as do most models. I will go with the model consensus and call for it to open back up into a wave in the long-term. Until it hits the shear I must say it may become a name system. But probably won't be a named system for very long though.


Yes that would be my call as well, the shear is still pretty hefty to the north of the system and its going to have to punch that shear to get to the other side one way or the other eventually. As I've said before if it can get far enough north it could well enter a more condusive region for development near the Bahamas region and into the E.Gulf...BUT that is a very long time away yet and there is a lot more to see before we get to that stage thankfully.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
rd261
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 4
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:52 am

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#337 Postby rd261 » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:24 pm

KWT wrote:
rd261 wrote:It certainly has an impressive structure, and more impressive still is the fact that it has been a pretty consistent storm. However, I do have my doubts on development due to being so early in the season.
.


Yep thats quite understandable, but really the conditions out in the MDR zone right now below say 13-15N are pretty exceptional for the time of year and certainly are a long way in advance of what you'd normally find in a typical June.


Very true. We just need some more convection over the center and then the NHC will have to upgrade this baby at least to a TD.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#338 Postby Recurve » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:34 pm

If there's something there to steer soon, steerings winds (UW charts) seem to not indicate any or much northward potential in the lower winds, not counting normal poleward tendency.

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

My impression from charts showing strong shear above 20N east of about 45W that a developing system wouldn't survive up there. KWT I believe pointed out there is a real jet streak in that area.

As others have said too, despite the impressive pinwheel banding, there isn't a lot of strong convection and not much over the center (last I looked). Still TPC sees good moisture in place and the typical but early "favorable conditions" continuing for a while.

I make no predictions. Things I'm sure will develop go poof, and little blobs I write off end up strengthening. That's why I'm an amateur and let the pros say what they see coming.

Never a bad time to check your kit, with likely more than 10 days or longer for everyone -- except maybe the Lesser Antilles.
0 likes   

User avatar
Recurve
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 8:59 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#339 Postby Recurve » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:40 pm

Some sheer increase in last 24 hours out ahead. This is latest sheer tendency I found (6/14 000z)

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L

#340 Postby ronjon » Sun Jun 13, 2010 8:41 pm

Actually looks like heavy convection is building just north of the center. Probably a depression by tomorrow. Models have trended further south with the eventual track with a caribbean threat likely although the high shear should weaken it significantly by then. Interestingly, SHIPS only shows 15-20 kts of shear after 3 days with less than 10 kts over the next 60 hours.

http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models/satellite/ETropical4kmIR.html
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests