ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#281 Postby Blown Away » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:37 am

I see mid level rotation but closer to the convection just S of the DR not down where the models initiate?
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#282 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:42 am

ronjon wrote:CC rotation evident near 16.3N-72.5W this morning - probably a mid-level feature but the area to watch later on if it works its way down to the surface. Convection on the increase again this morning. By the way, the wave appears to be tracking very close to the GFDL solution so far.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html


It does look like that, but I think I'll have to look at the high resolution images in that region first but yeah it looks like something is there.

That also would place the system closer to the jet axis with the upper high sitting close but with a tight gradient means shear quickly increases to the north of the system.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#283 Postby ROCK » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:46 am

got to learn to paste a image in here... :D

BAMMS for 06z....quite a shift left....but with nothing to track other than mid-level rotation and few t-storms, take it with a grain of salt



http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal ... el%20plots
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#284 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:47 am

12 UTC Best Track

AL, 93, 2010062212, , BEST, 0, 153N, 723W, 25, 1010, WV
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#285 Postby Frank2 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:48 am

Folks here who know me know that I usually won't post something like this, but when I heard the opening words to this song (after the intro - ahem), I had to laugh out loud:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6CAeDN9er8

P.S. NHC is down to 40 percent with their 8 a.m. TWO - now that's downcasting (LOL) - amazing at the decrease in convection from this time yesterday, but that's weather for you...
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#286 Postby ronjon » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:55 am

You can really begin to see the upper level high building and fanning out toward the north this morning. If this wave doesn't develop, you can't blame it on the upper air environment. I still think inflow from the south is being disrupted by SA.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_640.asp?product=tropical_ge_4km_visir2_floater_1
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#287 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:58 am

I also think the fact it has a very broad slack region of convergence isn't helping either, no real central point to the convection and so the system hasn't been able to tighten up just yet.

I'd be surprised still if we don't get something, 95E though may well throw a spanner in the works down the line, esp if it moves NW/NNW towards Mexico, the outflow would induce shear.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#288 Postby Frank2 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:00 am

The wave axis is pretty easy to identify ATTM near 73W MOV W...
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re:

#289 Postby Aquawind » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:07 am

[quote="KWT"]I also think the fact it has a very broad slack region of convergence isn't helping either, no real central point to the convection and so the system hasn't been able to tighten up just yet.[quote]


Yes I think it's better off with the smaller convective blob because it needs to consolidate.. Granted it still needs to get further west as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#290 Postby CourierPR » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:21 am

ronjon wrote:You can really begin to see the upper level high building and fanning out toward the north this morning. If this wave doesn't develop, you can't blame it on the upper air environment. I still think inflow from the south is being disrupted by SA.

http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis/online/loop_640.asp?product=tropical_ge_4km_visir2_floater_1

Good call. That building upper high is evident on satellite.
0 likes   

StormClouds63
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 583
Age: 62
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Southwest Louisiana

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#291 Postby StormClouds63 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:25 am

Even reaching tropical depression status is questionable after looking at this morning's satellite images. System also seems to have taken a northern jog overnight. I still think Alex is a July storm, but we'll see what happens in the next couple of days with 93AL.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#292 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:29 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#293 Postby Aquawind » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:32 am

Wow look at the envelop of moisture this massive wave is pushing west.. Strong wave is right.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#294 Postby hurricaneCW » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:34 am

StormClouds63 wrote:Even reaching tropical depression status is questionable after looking at this morning's satellite images. System also seems to have taken a northern jog overnight. I still think Alex is a July storm, but we'll see what happens in the next couple of days with 93AL.


I think it looks fine for a gradually developing system, convection is on the increase and wind shear is gradually decreasing. Its future looks bright with the upper high building in. Very warm waters too. If you loop it, you can almost see it developing a better structure.
0 likes   

User avatar
vacanechaser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Portsmouth, Va
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#295 Postby vacanechaser » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:38 am

hurricaneCW wrote:
StormClouds63 wrote:Even reaching tropical depression status is questionable after looking at this morning's satellite images. System also seems to have taken a northern jog overnight. I still think Alex is a July storm, but we'll see what happens in the next couple of days with 93AL.


I think it looks fine for a gradually developing system, convection is on the increase and wind shear is gradually decreasing. Its future looks bright with the upper high building in. Very warm waters too. If you loop it, you can almost see it developing a better structure.



i would agree with this, but the thing that is holding me back is we see no real maodel support... nothing of note in the globals.. to me, that is the sign... if they are now showing little of nothing, i think 93L may have a short future.. but we will see...



Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Reserach Team
0 likes   
Jesse V. Bass III
http://www.vastormphoto.com
Hurricane Intercept Research Team

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#296 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:51 am

Seems to be some turning with the convective mass just south of DR. Convective region may well induce flooding again in Haiti if it doesn't weaken. Quite a few of the GFDL runs form a system just to the south of Haiti weakly, so this feature maybe what the GFDL has been trying to form.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#297 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:58 am

Below is a long analysis made this morning by Dr Jeff Masters from WeatherUnderground about 93L.

Posted by: JeffMasters, 1:50 PM GMT on June 22, 2010

A modest region of intense thunderstorms (Invest 93L) is over the central Caribbean, a few hundred miles south of Hispaniola. This disturbance has the best chance to become Tropical Storm Alex of any system we've seen so far this year. We don't have any buoys near 93L, but pressures at the ground stations surrounding the storm are not falling. A pass of the ASCAT satellite over the Central Caribbean at 9:45 pm EDT last night revealed a modest wind shift associated with 93L, but nothing at all close to a surface circulation. Top surface winds seen by ASCAT were 15 - 20 mph. Water vapor satellite loops show that 93L is embedded in a large region of moist air. The atmosphere over the Caribbean has moistened over the past day, which should aid development of 93L. Wind shear is a low 5 - 10 knots. The high wind shear associated with the strong winds of the subtropical jet stream are over the northern Caribbean, too far north to interfere with development, but close enough to provide good upper-level outflow for the storm. Visible satellite loops show high level cirrus clouds streaming away from 93L to the northeast, evidence of the upper-level outflow channel that is developing to the storm's north. Sea Surface Temperatures are plenty warm, a record 29 - 30°C. The Madden-Julian oscillation (MJO) currently favors upward motion over the Caribbean, which will act to increase the chances of tropical storm formation this week. The Madden-Julian oscillation is a pattern of enhanced rainfall that travels along the Equator from west to east. The pattern has a wet phase with large-scale rising air and enhanced thunderstorm activity, followed by a dry phase with large-scale sinking air and suppressed thunderstorm activity. Each cycle lasts approximately 30 - 60 days. When the Madden-Julian oscillation is in its wet phase over a hurricane-prone region, the chances for tropical storm activity are greatly increased. The main negative for 93L continues to be lack of spin. The University of Wisconsin 850 mb relative vorticity analysis is showing that spin at 850 mb (roughly 5,000 feet in altitude) has increased over the past day, but 93L needs to acquire additional spin before it can grow more organized. I speculate that it is this lack of spin that contributed to the loss of much of 93L's heavy thunderstorm activity last night. The storm is now going through a cycle where it is building another respectable mass of heavy thunderstorms, and the increased inflow of low-level air that will feed these thunderstorms will likely enhance 93L's spin today. The Hurricane Hunters are on call to investigate 93L on Wednesday afternoon.

Forecast for 93L

NHC is giving 93L a 40% chance of developing into a tropical depression by Thursday morning, which is a reasonable forecast. Given the storm's current lack of spin and relatively modest amount of heavy thunderstorms, the earliest I'd expect 93L to become a tropical depression would be Wednesday afternoon, with Thursday more likely. Wind shear is expected to be low, less than 10 knots, over the central and western Caribbean this week. Water temperatures will be warm, dry air absent, and the MJO favorable. I don't see any major impediments to the storm becoming a tropical depression by Thursday, and it is a bit of a surprise to me that the computer models have been reluctant to develop 93L. The GFS, NOGAPS, and UKMET models do not develop 93L, and the ECMWF model doesn't develop 93L until after it crosses the Yucatan Peninsula and enters the Gulf of Mexico in a about a week. The current (2am EDT) run of the GFDL model predicts 93L will be a weak tropical storm in the Gulf of Mexico in five days; its previous run had 93L as a major hurricane in the Gulf. Given all this model reluctance and the current disorganization of 93L, I give the storm a low (less than 20% chance) of becoming a hurricane in the Caribbean. Expect 93L to bring flooding rains of 3 - 6 inches to Jamaica, eastern Cuba, and southwestern Haiti today through Wednesday. These rains will spread to the Cayman Islands and central Cuba by Thursday, and western Cuba and Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula on Friday. The current run of the SHIPS model has 93L slowing down late this week to a forward speed of just 6 knots (7 mph) from its current speed of about 10 mph, in response to a weakening in the steering currents. A trough of low pressure is expected to swing down over the Eastern U.S. early next week. If this trough is strong enough and 93L develops significantly, the storm could get pulled northwards and make landfall along the northern Gulf of Mexico coast in the oil spill region. This is the solution of the Canadian GEM model. If 93L stays weak and/or the trough is not so strong, the storm would get pushed west-northwestwards towards the Texas coast. This is the solution of the ECMWF model. The amount of wind shear in the Gulf of Mexico next week is highly uncertain. There is currently a band of high shear near 30 knots over the Gulf, and some of the models predict this shear will remain over the Gulf over the next 7 - 10 days. However, other models predict that this band of high shear will retreat northwards and leave the Gulf nearly shear-free. The long-term fate of 93L remains very murky. My main concerns at this point are the potential for 3 - 6 inches of rain in Haiti over the next two days, and the possibility 93L could become a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico next week.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
canes101
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 7:00 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#298 Postby canes101 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:18 am

Image
0 likes   
2010 Archive: HURRICANE ALEX, TD TWO, TS BONNIE, TS COLIN, TD FIVE, HURRICANE DANIELLE, HURRICANE EARL, TS FIONA, TS GASTON, TS HERMINE, HURRICANE IGOR, HURRICANE JULIA, HURRICANE KARL, HURRICANE LISA, TS MATTHEW, TS NICOLE, HURRICANE OTTO, HURRICANE PAULA (Active)

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#299 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:22 am

Certainly an interesting little curve to the convection on that image there...

Wouldn't surprise me if a MLC tries to form on the SW part of that convection.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#300 Postby ConvergenceZone » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:22 am

I"m not ready to throw in the towel yet with this sytem, but if it does develop, it probably won't be for several days.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests