ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#461 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:04 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
Florida1118 wrote:
PauleinHouston wrote:Simply an HPC generated "long duration" model depicting low and high pressure areas. I don't think it suggests whether it is just a low or a hurricane...simply and area of low pressure.

But in the very right coner of the 2nd and 3rd graphic they show a hurricane, then a TS the next day. So they do have intensity so.... No alex according to them?


I was looking at that too and I was like "what." If we have a hurricane in the Caribbean in 3 days, then we would have Alex.

I'm confused what they meant.


Image

I think the hurricane in day 3 and tropical storm in day 4 is some glitch bc it doesn't appear here
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#462 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:06 pm

:uarrow:

That's Celia in the EPAC.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#463 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:07 pm

Yeah your seeing Celia in the EPAC, but the graphic makes it look like its in the E.caribbean.

The HPC probably being rightly conservative in the longer term, but the fact they do show a closed low out to day 7 is interesting and tends to usually suggest something is likely to get up there.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#464 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:07 pm

srainhoutx wrote::uarrow:

That's Celia in the EPAC.


You're absolutely right! LOL
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#465 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:15 pm

ROCK wrote:dont get to caught up in the HPC long range...they are the HPC and not the NHC for a reason... :D


Don't be so quick to dismiss them. First of all...they coordinate their plots with TPC during the conference calls....they don't just put out a totally separate product. Second...I have found that when issuing forecasts they actually do a lot more "forecast reasoning" and a lot less "model consensus"...which I like. I really do not like a forecast that is derived primarily from splitting the models down the middle. HPC does a lot of initialization...they pick a model that is working...and they hang their hat on it...win or lose.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145322
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#466 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:18 pm

Here is a ship report from the area. A north wind west of the 18z position.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#467 Postby Florida1118 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:20 pm

The winds dont seem to be changing around into a circle, so no LLC is there. Yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#468 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:21 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
ROCK wrote:dont get to caught up in the HPC long range...they are the HPC and not the NHC for a reason... :D


Don't be so quick to dismiss them. First of all...they coordinate their plots with TPC during the conference calls....they don't just put out a totally separate product. Second...I have found that when issuing forecasts they actually do a lot more "forecast reasoning" and a lot less "model consensus"...which I like. I really do not like a forecast that is derived primarily from splitting the models down the middle. HPC does a lot of initialization...they pick a model that is working...and they hang their hat on it...win or lose.


Thank you AFM. I have never understood the sometimes lack of respect that the HPC receives. One of my first stops of the day weather wise is the HPC discussions. :wink:
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#469 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:23 pm

Florida1118 wrote:The winds dont seem to be changing around into a circle, so no LLC is there. Yet.


There is no LLC...but there is a broad area of low pressure...at least at cloud level. You can see some of the cu field drifting ever so slightly to the east in the high res imagery....which is a change from this morning.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#470 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:24 pm

cycloneye wrote:Here is a ship report from the area. A north wind west of the 18z position.

Image

the west wind... south of that north wind is very interesting..
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#471 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:25 pm

Interesting cycloneye, probably means there is a elongated broad low system there, going to need a lot mor ein the way of convection to really get going, these systems tend to take a good 36hrs to get, by which time it'll be in the prime time W.Caribbean and on Yucatan's doorstep...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#472 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:27 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Florida1118 wrote:The winds dont seem to be changing around into a circle, so no LLC is there. Yet.


There is no LLC...but there is a broad area of low pressure...at least at cloud level. You can see some of the cu field drifting ever so slightly to the east in the high res imagery....which is a change from this morning.
yes you can and if we can get some more concentrated convection in this area then things may turn around a little in organization..as the convergence will increase..
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#473 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:27 pm

srainhoutx wrote:
Thank you AFM. I have never understood the sometimes lack of respect that the HPC receives. One of my first stops of the day weather wise is the HPC discussions. :wink:


They are very knowledgeable. There is a big difference at the NHC between forecasters concerning the HPC. Some barely ask them the time of day during the conference calls....and some give them considerable time to explain their thoughts and reasoning. I always enjoy listening to what they have to say and plotting their points. They are usually within 2 degrees (1 most of the time)...even at 5 days...with the NHC.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29112
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#474 Postby vbhoutex » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:28 pm

I took a recent look at the visibles and try as I might I can not come up with any kind of LLC attempting to form. I even walked away for a while and came back and regenerated them and still can't come up with it. In fact I am having a little trouble finding the MLC I saw earlier today. 93L is definitely taking its' time and the longer it takes the further West it will end up if it doesn't go poof. This I am not liking for two reasons. First, it ups the chance of a W or NW GOM hit if it develops and also puts the oil disaster area on the E side of the system which will create an onshore flow. I don't like either scenario. Go poof 93L!!
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#475 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:41 pm

vbhoutex wrote:I took a recent look at the visibles and try as I might I can not come up with any kind of LLC attempting to form. I even walked away for a while and came back and regenerated them and still can't come up with it. In fact I am having a little trouble finding the MLC I saw earlier today. 93L is definitely taking its' time and the longer it takes the further West it will end up if it doesn't go poof. This I am not liking for two reasons. First, it ups the chance of a W or NW GOM hit if it develops and also puts the oil disaster area on the E side of the system which will create an onshore flow. I don't like either scenario. Go poof 93L!!


The MLC is still there and is still spinning...it has just lost its convection. It is located near 17-17.5 and 72. As I mentioned in an earlier post...there really is no LLC. It is more of a broad area of low pressure...but there are some areas of light and vrb winds...and even some westerly winds seen in observations and the cu field. If you look near 14.5 and 76 you can see this...and if you look to the west of this point...you can see winds out of the due north. This is an indication that we have a very sharp trof now...which we did not have before. If we get some deep convection over this area tonight...or even close to it (probably to the NE)...it won't take long for some Mid level vorticity to work its way down to the sfc.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=16&lon=-71&info=vis&zoom=2&width=2800&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=14&map=latlon
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#476 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:43 pm

Great analysis AF. Glad to see you back
0 likes   
Michael

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#477 Postby Florida1118 » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:01 pm

Nothing to do but wait, watch, and look at TWO.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#478 Postby KWT » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:02 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
The MLC is still there and is still spinning...it has just lost its convection. It is located near 17-17.5 and 72. As I mentioned in an earlier post...there really is no LLC. It is more of a broad area of low pressure...but there are some areas of light and vrb winds...and even some westerly winds seen in observations and the cu field. If you look near 14.5 and 76 you can see this...and if you look to the west of this point...you can see winds out of the due north. This is an indication that we have a very sharp trof now...which we did not have before. If we get some deep convection over this area tonight...or even close to it (probably to the NE)...it won't take long for some Mid level vorticity to work its way down to the sfc.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/get-goes?satellite=GOES-E%20CONUS&lat=16&lon=-71&info=vis&zoom=2&width=2800&height=2000&type=Animation&numframes=14&map=latlon


Yeah thanks for that AF, it is getting sharper now and as you say if we can get some decent convection over the system you'd see the system develop stronger, esp if it can develop some of its own convergence away from that convection which is heading into DR/Haiti.

Its going to be a close call as to whether it hits the Yucatan or not but thats a long way down the line still and much depends if it even forms!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#479 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:16 pm

Image
0 likes   
Michael

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#480 Postby Sanibel » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:21 pm

That MLC could be a vortex from island interaction.


Obvious energy in the convection but poor organization. The longer it keeps that energy the more likely it will form.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests