ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Chacor
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10229
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Singapore

#901 Postby Chacor » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:42 am

Recon cancelled for the second day in a row.

ABNT20 KNHC 241138
TWOAT
TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 AM EDT THU JUN 24 2010

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

A TROPICAL WAVE OVER THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA CONTINUES TO
PRODUCE SHOWERS AND A FEW THUNDERSTORMS ACROSS PORTIONS OF
HISPANIOLA...JAMAICA...CUBA...THE CAYMAN ISLANDS...AND THE ADJACENT
WATERS OF THE NORTHERN CARIBBEAN SEA. THIS SYSTEM HAS CHANGED
LITTLE IN ORGANIZATION OVER THE PAST SEVERAL HOURS...WITH MOST OF
THE SHOWER AND THUNDERSTORM ACTIVITY OCCURRING TO THE EAST OF THE
WAVE AXIS...AND THE AIR FORCE RESERVE UNIT RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT
MISSION TO INVESTIGATE THE AREA TODAY HAS BEEN CANCELED.
UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE EXPECTED TO BECOME MORE CONDUCIVE FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SYSTEM AS IT MOVES WESTWARD OR WEST-
NORTHWESTWARD AROUND 10 MPH OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS. THERE IS
A MEDIUM CHANCE...40 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER PASCH/CANGIALOSI
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#902 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:50 am

brunota2003 wrote:On the plus side, the storms are now more concentrated...on the negative side, they are not living very long, nor are they really deep.


Yeah thats because upper divergence is really poor with the actual wave feature and indeed looks more like convergence thenb divergence, which at upper levels is never going to be condusive for sustained development of storms. Until this changes, I'd be surprised if anything developed, esp as the Yucatan isn't that far away...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#903 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:55 am

ronjon wrote:I see some cyclonic turning near 17N-76W this morning - probably at the mid-levels.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rgb.html


nothing concentrated in that loop, no go today
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#904 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 6:58 am

By the way, all the storms SE of Jamaica where the system appears to be consolidating is NOT the same wave that generated 93L. That wave has moved out west of 80W and another has come in from the east. We tracked both waves since Africa for the past 10 days. In fact, the models actually appeared to be developing this 2nd wave and not the one in front that was identified as 93L. Regardless, the place to watch is SE of Jamaica not west of 80W where the models were initialized.
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#905 Postby wx247 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:07 am

Well the night came and went... while this system is in a much better place than it was 24 hours ago, it is still fighting to get going. I guess it is time for another wait and watch day. I think whoever said to quit watching and come back on Friday was very smart. ;)
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#906 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:08 am

So what is going to happen wxman57, will they decide to keep it as invest 93L or actually make invest 94L if it looks like that area is developing.

It certainly makes sense that the models are developing that region though because the ECM doesn't landfall till 72hrs time.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re:

#907 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:12 am

KWT wrote:So what is going to happen wxman57, will they decide to keep it as invest 93L or actually make invest 94L if it looks like that area is developing.

It certainly makes sense that the models are developing that region though because the ECM doesn't landfall till 72hrs time.


I hope not. Just keeping the area 93L would be less confusing. Look for the models to be re-initialized farther east later today or tomorrow. I wouldn't pay too much attention to them now.
Last edited by wxman57 on Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#908 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:12 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#909 Postby rockyman » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:15 am

wxman57 wrote:By the way, all the storms SE of Jamaica where the system appears to be consolidating is NOT the same wave that generated 93L. That wave has moved out west of 80W and another has come in from the east. We tracked both waves since Africa for the past 10 days. In fact, the models actually appeared to be developing this 2nd wave and not the one in front that was identified as 93L. Regardless, the place to watch is SE of Jamaica not west of 80W where the models were initialized.


Could this explain the "twin systems" that CMC keeps spinning up? Or, am I giving CMC too much credit?
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#910 Postby srainhoutx » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:16 am

I suspect that 93L will remain the primary focus. This has been a broad area lower pressures from the beginning with several waves. Remember the multiple solutions we have seen from various guidance of several low pressure centers. :wink:
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#911 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:17 am

wxman57 wrote:
KWT wrote:So what is going to happen wxman57, will they decide to keep it as invest 93L or actually make invest 94L if it looks like that area is developing.

It certainly makes sense that the models are developing that region though because the ECM doesn't landfall till 72hrs time.


I hope not. Just keeping the area 93L would be less confusing. Look for the models to be re-initialized farther east later today or tomorrow. I wouldn't pay too much attention to them now.


Yeah I think your right, certainly the area to the east does have better upper divergence, I also think a west track towards Yucatan and into S.Mexico would be favoured in that solution.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#912 Postby rockyman » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:19 am

SSD did a "partial relocation" during the night (from 79.5 to 77.8):

24/1145 UTC 16.2N 78.9W TOO WEAK 93L
24/0545 UTC 16.8N 77.8W TOO WEAK 93L
23/2345 UTC 17.0N 79.5W TOO WEAK 93L
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#913 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:29 am

Call me crazy but if Wxman is right I think we are witnessing the Fujiwara effect. I know there are not two clearly defined circulation but it appears 93L was trying to get going just SW of Jamaica last night and it's vortice/circulation has been moving SSW while the feature behind is rotating and interacting to it's NE. Is that a plausible explanation as to why 93L hasn't been able to get it's act together? the feature behind it has been steadily zapping it's energy.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

cwachal

#914 Postby cwachal » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:31 am

the Fujiwara affect is defined as 2 tropical systems rotating around each other but these are not tropical systems
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#915 Postby HouTXmetro » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:36 am

cwachal wrote:the Fujiwara affect is defined as 2 tropical systems rotating around each other but these are not tropical systems


Aren't these two Tropical Waves with a sharp axis? I'm not a met and I'm not saying it's text book Fujiwara but maybe something of the sort.


en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujiwhara_effect
The Fujiwhara effect or Fujiwara interaction is a type of interaction between two nearby cyclonic vortices
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#916 Postby rockyman » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:41 am

HouTXmetro wrote:Call me crazy but if Wxman is right I think we are witnessing the Fujiwara effect. I know there are not two clearly defined circulation but it appears 93L was trying to get going just SW of Jamaica last night and it's vortice/circulation has been moving SSW while the feature behind is rotating and interacting to it's NE. Is that a plausible explanation as to why 93L hasn't been able to get it's act together? the feature behind it has been steadily zapping it's energy.


The steering currents could also explain the movement of these systems:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#917 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:42 am

HouTXmetro wrote: Is that a plausible explanation as to why 93L hasn't been able to get it's act together? the feature behind it has been steadily zapping it's energy.


Sort of, more like the first wave never had good enough conditions aloft with regards to creating instablity whilst the better region for that was further east, plus the shear looks just a little bit weaker on that side as well.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145362
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#918 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:52 am

Another hurdle that may cause some problems for whatever this Caribbean Disturbance be down the road may be the outflow from Darby if it moves into the BOC.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145362
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#919 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:02 am

12 UTC Best Track

AL, 93, 2010062412, , BEST, 0, 165N, 796W, 25, 1008,WV
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#920 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:02 am

Getting tired of 93L. :x lol
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests