ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1001 Postby srainhoutx » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:09 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Hmm..not looking at the low by central america

Image
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re:

#1002 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:10 pm

x-y-no wrote:I don't see the western wave lifting NW unless it deepens - and it's shown absolutely no hint of doing so yet.

If it stays a naked surface swirl, it seems to me it will keep moving west straight into CA.


My take: The wave doesn't have to move NW. The fact is the wave axis is leaning NE and that is where any eventual LLC will form.

If this thing develops...it will probably do so in this manner:
1) Surge of easterlies seen moving through central and eastern CAR. Sea (watch vis loops and notice how fast cu field is moving W-WNW) moves into backside of wave axis...
2) Meanwhile...pressures south of Haiti and Hisp fall due to intense convection (brought on by increasing speed convegence of low level surge)...and wave axis tilts ENE from broad low in response to lowering pressures...broad surface low also stops moving west...
3) intense convection fires along eastside of wave axis during diurnal max...lowering pressures even more...
4) LLC forms NE of broad low...deepens...and eventually becomes the only low.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20010
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1003 Postby tolakram » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:14 pm

How about this loop.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=16

This is the area I was watching earlier. Speed up the loop and carefully watch the CU clouds west of 75W. See how they seem to be drifting more toward the N/NE with time, rather that drifting NW with the old center? I think the persistent convection here is creating a new area of low pressure ... stealing words from the pro met above, and this is what I'm seeing.
Last edited by tolakram on Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#1004 Postby Aquawind » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:14 pm

Still a naked swirl alright..more pronounced but still entirely naked. I am having a hard time thinking it's going to make any dramatic changes so close to land. It's is going to have to make a pretty dramatic change in direction and at some point convection has to fireup overhead.. It looks like the only player at the LLs so maybe after it weakens another will reform with some convection but, I don't have alot of confidence it that either. Annoying 93L.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/flash-rgb.html
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1005 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:14 pm

16N82W is just off the coast of Honduras. If that is the actual center, it might be inland before it has a chance to develop...
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Re:

#1006 Postby x-y-no » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:16 pm

Air Force Met wrote:I think to many on here are way to quick to dismiss oppr old 93L. I disagree with x-y-no on it running out of time. I think what is happening is a secondary impulse is moving into the backside of the wave and we see that result in the form of the deep convection exploding south of Hisp. There is a surge of low level easterlies pressing into the wave axis and this is the cause of the convection...and why the wave axis is starting to tilt more towards the NE (insted of N-S).

If you look at the hi-res vis loops and watch the actual broad low...you can see that it is slowely becoming less round and more egg shaped...leaning NE-SW. What is happening is the low level cu field is responding to the lowering pressures in the area...

I give this more than a 50/50 chance...more like a 70% chance of forming...probably by tomorrow night. I don't think the trof will catch it...and believe that somewhere along the lower TX coast or N Mexico is the eventual destination. What could also happen is the GFS is more right than I am giving it credit...and future Alex moves into the north or central Gulf...stalls...then heads to the west as the ridge builds in.

There...that's my 2 cents...for what it is worth...


I think we may be saying the same thing in different ways.

The feature I was referring to as "running out of time" is specifically the wave axis which has now passed 81W and is still moving westward with essentially no associated convection.

And like you, I see a secondary impulse (the weak wave analyzed at 71W) approaching the convection south of Hispaniola, and I speculated that could interact with that area to spin something up.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38091
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1007 Postby Brent » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:16 pm

tolakram wrote:How about this loop.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=15

This is the area I was watching earlier. Speed up the loop and carefully watch the CU clouds west of 75W. See how they seem to be drifting more toward the N/NE with time, rather that drifting NW with the old center? I think the persistent convection here is creating a new area of low pressure ... stealing words from the pro met above, and this is what I'm seeing.


I agree with that, it looks very interesting to me. I think the only chance this has for significant development anytime soon is to reform further east.
0 likes   
#neversummer

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1008 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:17 pm

Twins :D

Ivanhater wrote:Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#1009 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:18 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
x-y-no wrote:I don't see the western wave lifting NW unless it deepens - and it's shown absolutely no hint of doing so yet.

If it stays a naked surface swirl, it seems to me it will keep moving west straight into CA.


My take: The wave doesn't have to move NW. The fact is the wave axis is leaning NE and that is where any eventual LLC will form.

If this thing develops...it will probably do so in this manner:
1) Surge of easterlies seen moving through central and eastern CAR. Sea (watch vis loops and notice how fast cu field is moving W-WNW) moves into backside of wave axis...
2) Meanwhile...pressures south of Haiti and Hisp fall due to intense convection (brought on by increasing speed convegence of low level surge)...and wave axis tilts ENE from broad low in response to lowering pressures...broad surface low also stops moving west...
3) intense convection fires along eastside of wave axis during diurnal max...lowering pressures even more...
4) LLC forms NE of broad low...deepens...and eventually becomes the only low.


Yeah I was wondering about that, a tighter LLC forming within the broad low level circulation as the convection increases to the east of the wave, esp as the better conditions aloft catch the wave up.

That being said I'd be very surprised if we get things going in one D-max, think it may take a couple of stabs at it...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Cdeck81
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Age: 28
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:40 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1010 Postby Cdeck81 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:19 pm

Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?
0 likes   
____________________________
I survived Allison, Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1011 Postby x-y-no » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:21 pm

Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?


Upgrade?

Maybe a slight increase in the probability ...
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1012 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:22 pm

Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?


Maybe from Big Mess to Even Bigger Mess
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1013 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:23 pm

If you add the days of 90L + 91L + 92L + 93L, this is the 20th invest day and we still can't get a depression to form!

No wonder most of us are frustrated!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
dixiebreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5140
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: crystal river, fla.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1014 Postby dixiebreeze » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:23 pm

x-y-no wrote:
Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?


Upgrade?

Maybe a slight increase in the probability ...



Watch 2 a.m. Friday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1015 Postby Aquawind » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:24 pm

Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?



Unlikely..unless come convection is associated with either the existing LL rotation or a with a obvious new forming LLC.. Which I do have more confidence will happen after reading AFM's postings..but it will still take awhile for that to happen..
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1016 Postby Air Force Met » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:24 pm

Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?


An upgrade in %? Yes...I suspect there will be a small tick up.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#1017 Postby KWT » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:24 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:16N82W is just off the coast of Honduras. If that is the actual center, it might be inland before it has a chance to develop...


I think what AFM has some merit, plus remember its only a broad low which is quite elongated still, its quite possible the circulation will form on the eastern side of the circulation and the upper trough should cause the system to start lifting NW in the next 24-36hrs...GFDL is pretty much on the money with where the broad low is right now.

Now we have a LLC will probably see it go upto 50%, possibly even 60% if convection looks like its getting closer.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1018 Postby Aquawind » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:27 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Cdeck81 wrote:Does anyone expect an upgrade at 8?


An upgrade in %? Yes...I suspect there will be a small tick up.



I guess that does figure being I said my confidence was going up after reading your postings..lol 50% would be my guess and it should happen within the 48 hour period..
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1019 Postby Ivanhater » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:28 pm

Interesting discussion from AFM, I just wish we had consistency in models. An awful lot of them take it into the central GOM.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Cdeck81
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Age: 28
Joined: Sat May 29, 2010 9:40 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - DISCUSSION

#1020 Postby Cdeck81 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:32 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Interesting discussion from AFM, I just wish we had consistency in models. An awful lot of them take it into the central GOM.

I know. We will just have to wait until this actually becomes something (if it ever does) and then there should be some consistency in the models. It's still to early to tell.
0 likes   
____________________________
I survived Allison, Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests