ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re:

#2221 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:18 am

gatorcane wrote:When I look at the SAT images I still see a distinctive WNW movement so a ridge is still present over the GOM, albeit is getting pushed eastward by an approaching trough digging into the Central Plains (quite evident on SAT images). Structure still looks great. When it emerges in the BOC the upper-level conditions appear ideal with very warm SSTs. This could certainly be a major hurricane if it can stay over water long enough.

If it does end up getting pulled up more north towards Texas, it will have more time over water and could be quite a large and powerful system. The good thing is that most of the models still show a Mexico landfall and the ECMWF continues to show this, which is important. I think if Alex can deepen more quickly than anticipated, it may be able to feel the weakness further and get pull more north before ridging builds back in to send it west.



It is important to note last night the euro had a huge change. It moved Alex NW deep from the boc to the border which is a stark difference from the previous runs showing a due west heading deep in the boc.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: Re:

#2222 Postby Emmett_Brown » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:22 am

Ivanhater wrote:
gatorcane wrote:When I look at the SAT images I still see a distinctive WNW movement so a ridge is still present over the GOM, albeit is getting pushed eastward by an approaching trough digging into the Central Plains (quite evident on SAT images). Structure still looks great. When it emerges in the BOC the upper-level conditions appear ideal with very warm SSTs. This could certainly be a major hurricane if it can stay over water long enough.

If it does end up getting pulled up more north towards Texas, it will have more time over water and could be quite a large and powerful system. The good thing is that most of the models still show a Mexico landfall and the ECMWF continues to show this, which is important. I think if Alex can deepen more quickly than anticipated, it may be able to feel the weakness further and get pull more north before ridging builds back in to send it west.



It is important to note last night the euro had a huge change. It moved Alex NW deep from the boc to the border which is a stark difference from the previous runs showing a due west heading deep in the boc.


And the trend hasn't stopped... the models have trended to the right gradually for the past 24 hours. It will be interesting if they continue to trend right. There is a lot of time left.
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#2223 Postby wx247 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:32 am

All I know is that I wouldn't want to be a forecaster at the NHC today. This is going to be an important as far as the forecast goes. Adequate lead time is necessary for those who are needing to make preparations in response to the oil spill in the gulf. Track forecasts this time around will be more imperative than usual.

While I am still not completely on board with a US landfall, I will agree that the track has shifted some more toward the north. You can't discount the movement of the models. While the new track coming out in an hour will be interesting, I think the more important tracks will be the ones at 4 and 10 p.m. central time.

As always, this is just my $.04 worth...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re:

#2224 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:33 am

wx247 wrote:All I know is that I wouldn't want to be a forecaster at the NHC today. This is going to be an important as far as the forecast goes. Adequate lead time is necessary for those who are needing to make preparations in response to the oil spill in the gulf. Track forecasts this time around will be more imperative than usual.

While I am still not completely on board with a US landfall, I will agree that the track has shifted some more toward the north. You can't discount the movement of the models. While the new track coming out in an hour will be interesting, I think the more important tracks will be the ones at 4 and 10 p.m. central time.

As always, this is just my $.04 worth...

I really agree with you on that. If this storm were to hit the oil spill area.....
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re:

#2225 Postby tailgater » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:37 am

Emmett_Brown wrote:Alex is very large. The envelop is really something... there are showers as far north as the N Central GOM at this time, at least distantly related to the circulation. I think his overall size lends credence to the models that show a more poleward motion... assuming he continues to take up so much real estate, his size will help add to the erosion of the ridge.


Nice to see you back EB,
Looking like a due west movement in last couple hrs. 94L could aslo be a player in the ridges erosion. but hope it"ll just continue on this westerly course.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#2226 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:42 am

If the storm were to stall say...100 miles off shore..would it weaken or strengthen? I need to know so i can do my forecast. I heard someone saying it might stall so...

Thanks in Advance.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Ntxwx
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:43 am
Location: Bridgeport, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2227 Postby Ntxwx » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:43 am

Looked amazing an hour or 2 ago, with a well defined center, strong banding convection blowing up around both sides. But has weakened considerably within the last hour in all ways.. But the last frame shows it being about an hour away from hostile waters. It way take 6-12 hours just to develop it's structure again, but after that we can probably expect some impressive bombing. Alex has some major potential in the BOC/GOM.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#2228 Postby KWT » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:46 am

Yeah it really hasn't lfited up much in the last few hours probably simply because the system weakened, I do wonder once it starts to beef itself up over water it'll tap into the weakness a little further like it had done in the period where it tightened up overland...

Going to be a very important 24hrs for knowing what Alex does, I think C/N Mexico has to be the most likely call for now but further adjustments are always possible.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
mpic
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 623
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Splendora, TX

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2229 Postby mpic » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:46 am

We could certainly use some rain off this system in the Houston area, but what bothers me is that Ike was forecast to hit the TX/Mex border early on, too. Hopefully, it won't come this far east and minimize the chances of more damage to wells.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9485
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2230 Postby ROCK » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:47 am

EB, back from hibernation! I remember you back in the old days.... :D

Alex is about half way across....I have no doubt it will get back together once splash down...
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23006
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2231 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:48 am

Note that on the marine advisories, Alex's radius of 39 mph winds is only forecast to be 90 nm (105 miles) on the latest advisory. That's fairly average as far as size goes. In contrast, Ike's radius of 39 mph winds was up to 240 nm (276 miles) prior to landfall. So Alex is average to a little below average as far as its PREDICTED size by the NHC. It does appear that Alex is contracting. The circulation envelope isn't as large as yesterday or the day before. Typical of a developing system. That said, it's possible that Alex's wind field could be larger than is currently forecast. I was forecasting about 110 nm for the 39 mph wind field by Tuesday afternoon. That's still about average, though.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2232 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:48 am

Ntxwx wrote:Looked amazing an hour or 2 ago, with a well defined center, strong banding convection blowing up around both sides. But has weakened considerably within the last hour in all ways.. But the last frame shows it being about an hour away from hostile waters. It way take 6-12 hours just to develop it's structure again, but after that we can probably expect some impressive bombing. Alex has some major potential in the BOC/GOM.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

I totally agree with you. I think it will emerge as a Deppression...Then become a TS when Recon goes in. Then i think it Bombs Away!

Why?
Shear-LOW
SST's-WARM(90 Degrees F +)
Land-NONE
Time over water-2-4 days+
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2233 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:51 am

wxman57 wrote:Note that on the marine advisories, Alex's radius of 39 mph winds is only forecast to be 90 nm (105 miles) on the latest advisory. That's fairly average as far as size goes. In contrast, Ike's radius of 39 mph winds was up to 240 nm (276 miles) prior to landfall. So Alex is average to a little below average as far as its PREDICTED size by the NHC. It does appear that Alex is contracting. The circulation envelope isn't as large as yesterday or the day before. Typical of a developing system. That said, it's possible that Alex's wind field could be larger than is currently forecast. I was forecasting about 110 nm for the 39 mph wind field by Tuesday afternoon. That's still about average, though.

Ike was a 110MPH hurricane. Alex is a 40MPH TS.

And then there was Marco..10 Mile wind radius. LOL.

I was looking at an IR loop, and it looked like the Deep COnvection over the center had warmed about 5-10 Degrees C.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2234 Postby hurricaneCW » Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:57 am

Last few images show the core falling apart, if it does get its act together, I'm thinking no higher than a strong category 1 (95mph).
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2235 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:01 am

Image

A few hours from the coast
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#2236 Postby artist » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:06 am

now, see, to these untrained eyes I see the center core remaining strong. What am I missing?
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

#2237 Postby bob rulz » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:09 am

Everyone who says it won't have time to get its act together has a pretty short memory. History is riddled with examples of hurricanes that crossed the Yucatan, fell apart, and re-organized to attain nearly their previous intensity, sometimes cat 3 or even 4.

Also, don't forget Audrey in 1957 - it formed in the southern Gulf and was a category 4 at landfall in Texas. This was in late June, not August or September.
0 likes   

User avatar
Cape Verde
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 564
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:53 pm
Location: Houston area

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2238 Postby Cape Verde » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:10 am

The morning discussion certainly got my attention. My speculation yesterday that Texas was not out of the woods was not well-received, and that is fine. I am not qualified to even suggest I can make a personal forecast.

But what a difference 24 hours makes. I still hope it makes final landfall south of Brownsville. But if the guys at the NHC are discussing a theoretically possible landfall as a very strong hurricane along the Texas/Louisiana border, then I suddenly have a very personal interest in this storm, and increased concern for BP Macondo oil leak activities.

I think we'll have a much better idea when the center crosses into the BOC.
0 likes   

bob rulz
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1704
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 7:30 pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re:

#2239 Postby bob rulz » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:11 am

artist wrote:now, see, to these untrained eyes I see the center core remaining strong. What am I missing?


You have to look at the IR - the cloud tops have warmed considerably and the center is not as definite as it was a few hours ago.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#2240 Postby Sanibel » Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:14 am

Storm appears to be emerging on the Mexico track. Wish I was in Tampico right now. Cyclones can be finnicky about reorganizing once they emerge in the Bay Of Campeche. We'll see how this favorable overhead and SST's play out.


The lower part of the western trough appears to be flattening west-east while the northern part plunges.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests