ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION ALEX - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3261 Postby lrak » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:00 pm

Portastorm wrote:It is a bit surreal to see my town in the NHC wind probability chart. Doesn't happen too often (thankfully). :double:



My parents live right along the beach in Port Aransas. I don't like this one bit. These things are suppose to go North! Nothing against my Northern friends :P
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: Re:

#3262 Postby ozonepete » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:01 pm

Cainer wrote:
Andrew92 wrote:And then down to 6 knots at a place of 985.3 mb! Then, when they start seeing higher pressures, the winds pick up. VERY interesting. I'll say it again, eye forming?

-Andrew92


Not necessarily, cyclones of any strength have a calm region at there center, even tropical depressions. Only hurricanes develop a cloud-free area around their center, however. That being said, with a pressure fall of 2 mb between passes, and the deep convection forming over the center, it probably wont be long before we start seeing an eye-feature. Just my 2 cents!


Just to clarify it is TROPICAL cyclones. Mid-latitude and polar cyclones do not, in most cases, have calm centers.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Re:

#3263 Postby Air Force Met » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:01 pm

AJC3 wrote:

To address your first question, the whole thing about "fronts" steering tropical systems is simplistic, and really a misnomer perpetuated by meteorologists who are either too ignorant or too lazy to explain what is actually happening.


And he comes out swinging!
0 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3264 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:03 pm

Delta...you are a flipper... :D
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re:

#3265 Postby TwisterFanatic » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:03 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:It's like I said earlier, with the stall that the models were not indicating and the jog northward you could pretty much throw out the old model runs. This movement to the north changes the outcome and if this movement continues it could be large!!


The NHC shows a sharp left turn tomorrow but i am not so sure that is going to happen now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3266 Postby deltadog03 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Wx_Warrior wrote:Delta...you are a flipper... :D



LOL...not too much...I thought either side of BRO would be the landing area for alex. Ya, I did go up just a little bit.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re:

#3267 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:04 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:It's like I said earlier, with the stall that the models were not indicating and the jog northward you could pretty much throw out the old model runs. This movement to the north changes the outcome and if this movement continues it could be large!!


I should have also added speed. If the Gulf Ridge is breaking down really fast then Alex could really accelerate while keeping this heading, that could make a BIG difference.
0 likes   

User avatar
summersquall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 230
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:23 am
Location: Jensen Beach FL 27°N 80°W (roughly)

#3268 Postby summersquall » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:05 pm

I want to thank from the bottom of my heart the time and energy all on this board, particularly the pros take to share their knowledge with us.

I love weather and want to learn and you all are awesome.

I wish us all a safe and interesting season.

God Bless.
0 likes   
My posts should NEVER, EVER, EVER be construed as an official forecast as I know virtually nada respecting the finer points of meteorology. Consequently, my posts are obviously NOT endorsed by any professional institution or the good folks at storm2k.org. For official information please refer to the weather gurus at the NHC and NWS.

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3269 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:05 pm

I'm surprised the NHC only shows it strengthening to 80 knots, I would think at least 90 knots would make more sense considering the favorable environment expected.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#3270 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:05 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6179
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3271 Postby Texas Snowman » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:05 pm

TwisterFanatic wrote:IF you ask me this is starting to look more like a Texas storm...


LOL!!! :D

I'm not laughing at you TwisterFanatic, just at what you said. Because it wasn't too long ago this evening that someone posted that this was looking more and more like a Mexico storm!

Bottom line, Alex isn't necessarily playing by the rule book. I think anything from Rockport to NE Mexico is in play with this one for a potential landfall.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3272 Postby timNms » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:06 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
timNms wrote: However, what's going to happen with the front. Is it going to wash out (or retreat back as a warm front) and allow Alex to turn west?

I also have read that a high is supposed to be building in to the north, but in order for that to happen and it have an effect on Alex's path, wouldn't the front have to be out of the way?


When thinking of steering for tropical systems...you must think higher than the surface. Fronts are surface features. Fronts don't turn hurricanes...its the upper level winds that brings the fronts down in the first place (upper level trofs and lows) that do that. A front will, however, because of cold air convection, weaken a ridge aloft...and create a weakness.

The high that is supposed to be building (and is building over the Rockies) is not at the sfc...but up at around 18,000 feet. Fronts move out of the way when high like that build because of sinking air and other thermo-dynamic phenom. that is frankley very complicated to explain and I would be here all night... :)


Thanks, AFM. I knew it had to be much more complicated than what I'd posted. I appreciate your time.
Let's see if I understand a little better. The front that is moving westward is being driven by an upper level trough that has/is creating a weakness in the high (along with that ULL that's over SE LA). This has allowed a more northward motion in Alex over the past few hours.
What is going to happen to the trough that is driving the front as the high builds back in? (Stupid question?)
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#3273 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:06 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:It's like I said earlier, with the stall that the models were not indicating and the jog northward you could pretty much throw out the old model runs. This movement to the north changes the outcome and if this movement continues it could be large!!


I should have also added speed. If the Gulf Ridge is breaking down really fast then Alex could really accelerate while keeping this heading, that could make a BIG difference.


Looks like he is accelerating now to me.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3999
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: Ballston Spa, New York
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3274 Postby AJC3 » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:06 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
AJC3 wrote:

To address your first question, the whole thing about "fronts" steering tropical systems is simplistic, and really a misnomer perpetuated by meteorologists who are either too ignorant or too lazy to explain what is actually happening.


And he comes out swinging!



I figured you'd like that! :lol:
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Re:

#3275 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:07 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:It's like I said earlier, with the stall that the models were not indicating and the jog northward you could pretty much throw out the old model runs. This movement to the north changes the outcome and if this movement continues it could be large!!


I should have also added speed. If the Gulf Ridge is breaking down really fast then Alex could really accelerate while keeping this heading, that could make a BIG difference.


Looks like he is accelerating now to me.


I noticed that too, could be a bad sign IMO.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3276 Postby TwisterFanatic » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:08 pm

Texas Snowman wrote:
TwisterFanatic wrote:IF you ask me this is starting to look more like a Texas storm...


LOL!!! :D

I'm not laughing at you TwisterFanatic, just at what you said. Because it wasn't too long ago this evening that someone posted that this was looking more and more like a Mexico storm!

Bottom line, Alex isn't necessarily playing by the rule book. I think anything from Rockport to NE Mexico is in play with this one for a potential landfall.


Your laughing at me because im a n00b. lol :D
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Texas Snowman
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 6179
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 11:29 am
Location: Denison, Texas

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3277 Postby Texas Snowman » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:10 pm

TwisterFanatic wrote:
Texas Snowman wrote:
TwisterFanatic wrote:IF you ask me this is starting to look more like a Texas storm...


LOL!!! :D

I'm not laughing at you TwisterFanatic, just at what you said. Because it wasn't too long ago this evening that someone posted that this was looking more and more like a Mexico storm!

Bottom line, Alex isn't necessarily playing by the rule book. I think anything from Rockport to NE Mexico is in play with this one for a potential landfall.


Your laughing at me because im a n00b. lol :D


Nope, I'm laughing because you can tell it is full blown hurricane season now. We're all in wobble watching mode!!! :D
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Texas Snowman is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

timNms
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1371
Age: 63
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2002 5:45 pm
Location: Seminary, Mississippi
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3278 Postby timNms » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:10 pm

AJC3 wrote:
timNms wrote:I posted this on the model thread but no one has answered. Question for AFM or anyone with some expertise.

We've got a front moving in and an ULL over MS/LA. I'm assuming the ULL is going to continue to move eastward and get outta the way. However, what's going to happen with the front. Is it going to wash out (or retreat back as a warm front) and allow Alex to turn west?
Local NWS here is saying the front is going to stall out around the I 20 corridor in MS and hang out for a few days.

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but don't fronts tend to steer tropical systems? I don't recall ever hearing of a tropical system crossing a front. If the front doesn't wash out or retreat to the north, what happens to Alex and his track? I also have read that a high is supposed to be building in to the north, but in order for that to happen and it have an effect on Alex's path, wouldn't the front have to be out of the way?


To address your first question, the whole thing about "fronts" steering tropical systems is simplistic, and really a misnomer perpetuated by meteorologists who are either too ignorant or too lazy to explain what is actually happening. A front is nothing more than a boundary between air masses. Tropical cyclones are steered by mean layer winds, the depth of which depends on how vertically deep/coherent (i.e. strong) the cyclone is.

Fronts don't magically attract or deflect storms. Not all fronts are created equal and the mid and upper air pattern can vary greatly above the surface. Strong cold fronts are usually oriented more meridionally (N-S) and associated with strongly amplified (sharp or deep) mid and upper level troughs which in turn create a deep layer of southerly and southwest flow which is sufficient to recurve a cyclone. Weak fronts (generally oriented more zonally E-W) are associated with weak upper troughs which are usually not sufficient to recurve a TC. A lot also depends on the position of the front and it's parent mid-upper level trough in relation to the TC.

In short, look at more than the fact that there's a front there. Look at more levels (850MB, 700MB, 500MB, etc.) to gauge more accurately what effect an area near a cold front might have on a TC.


Thanks, AJC. I learned something new tonight from you and AFM.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: Re:

#3279 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:10 pm

timNms wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
timNms wrote: However, what's going to happen with the front. Is it going to wash out (or retreat back as a warm front) and allow Alex to turn west?

I also have read that a high is supposed to be building in to the north, but in order for that to happen and it have an effect on Alex's path, wouldn't the front have to be out of the way?


When thinking of steering for tropical systems...you must think higher than the surface. Fronts are surface features. Fronts don't turn hurricanes...its the upper level winds that brings the fronts down in the first place (upper level trofs and lows) that do that. A front will, however, because of cold air convection, weaken a ridge aloft...and create a weakness.

The high that is supposed to be building (and is building over the Rockies) is not at the sfc...but up at around 18,000 feet. Fronts move out of the way when high like that build because of sinking air and other thermo-dynamic phenom. that is frankley very complicated to explain and I would be here all night... :)


Thanks, AFM. I knew it had to be much more complicated than what I'd posted. I appreciate your time.
Let's see if I understand a little better. The front that is moving westward is being driven by an upper level trough that has/is creating a weakness in the high (along with that ULL that's over SE LA). This has allowed a more northward motion in Alex over the past few hours.
What is going to happen to the trough that is driving the front as the high builds back in? (Stupid question?)



This trough should head into eastern Canada or off the NE Seaboard, that is why the front is expected to wash out north of the Gulf Coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145520
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: TROPICAL STORM ALEX - DISCUSSION

#3280 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:10 pm

Irak,you better prepare there as that area may get much of it,even if the center passes well to the south of CC.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests