ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6684
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
I believe it's safe to say now that 95L is possibly on it's way to becoming a TD. IMO
http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satelli ... uration=12
http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/satelli ... uration=12
0 likes
- lrak
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1770
- Age: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42360
this buoy had a strong WSW this morning.
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42001
the 42001 has SSW current direction....hmmm...it sure is tiny, but cool to watch. I remember Bret about that size with 160mph winds
this buoy had a strong WSW this morning.
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42001
the 42001 has SSW current direction....hmmm...it sure is tiny, but cool to watch. I remember Bret about that size with 160mph winds

0 likes
AKA karl
Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
It looks not bad right now but its going to need to hold that convective look for a while.
Looks like its starting to lift up a little now, I think there is certainly a chance the NHC will become muchmore itnerested in development, I'd think we could go as high as 40-50% next time given the convection is slapbang over the center.
Reminds me of a similar thing to the May invest of 2009 that made landfall as pretty much a weak TC.
Looks like its starting to lift up a little now, I think there is certainly a chance the NHC will become muchmore itnerested in development, I'd think we could go as high as 40-50% next time given the convection is slapbang over the center.
Reminds me of a similar thing to the May invest of 2009 that made landfall as pretty much a weak TC.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
I could definitely seeing this with its super tight convection get up to cat 1 if it stays together. It wouldn't have much impact except for where it makes landfall unless it decides to expand in size before making landfall.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes
- lrak
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1770
- Age: 58
- Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
- Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION

could it be...what about the shear? Is it going to decrease enough?
0 likes
AKA karl
Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:01 pm
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
lrak wrote:
could it be...what about the shear? Is it going to decrease enough?
Maybe 20kt looks less to the north. I think the dry air is a bigger problem.
0 likes
- HurricaneBelle
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1179
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
- Location: Clearwater, FL
Re:
pepeavilenho wrote:This is like Grace last year...
Reminds me more of Marco of 2008, the ultimate mini-storm.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 11
- Age: 66
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:37 pm
- Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
The factor that will most limit 95L is the dry air surrounding her on at least 2 sides, followed closely by lack of time and water, with shear finishing a distant 3rd place. However, she is looking the best we've seen her up to this this point.
Yes, they are all still females to me, at least until they get a male name...

Yes, they are all still females to me, at least until they get a male name...

0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1289
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
ToxicTiger wrote:Yes, they are all still females to me, at least until they get a male name...
Since this would be called Bonnie if it developed now, that's ok

The following is the opinion of Cryomaniac, and is not based on any evidence, meteorological or otherwise, and as such it should not be used for any purpose.
This looks like it's trying to form. The dry air will limit it somewhat, but I think it can become Bonnie or Colin. I'll also say that if we do get both Bonnie and Colin from 95L and 96L then this season is shaping up to be very active.
0 likes
Pretty much a one cluster of storms, I've seen multicell clusters bigger then this then. Again there can be no doubt there is a circulation there and it is producing moderate to deep convection, so it may well meet the targets to become a TC. I think there is a chance for a short lived system.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
If 95L developed, it would likely be one of the smallest tropical cyclones ever recorded. Interestingly Bonnie in 2004 was also very small.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
From the Visible loops there does seem to be some cyclonic turning. Probably won't get any kind of an upgrade unless there is a Hurricane Hunter flight through it, much like Marco back in '08
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
Ptarmigan wrote:If 95L developed, it would likely be one of the smallest tropical cyclones ever recorded. Interestingly Bonnie in 2004 was also very small.
If convection holds and the winds strengthen then the NHC may well be tempted to upgrade to a TD, probably won't have time to go beyond that stage but its clearly got west winds so there is no doubt about any LLC, its just convective organisation thats been the issue and we are getting it now...just need to hold onto it.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29112
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - DISCUSSION
I am quite impressed by 95L at this point. It has a lot of fighting to do if it is going to develop, but it is sure acting like the little engine that could. If I didn't see the circulation associated with it I would write it off as a cluster of thunderstorms. I'll definitely be keeping an eye on it, but at this point it doesn't worry me except for the fact that if it develops enough it will make a weakness in the ridge that could draw 96L more NW or N than currently progged.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests