ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#401 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:28 pm

Image

Probability map.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#402 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:29 pm

To me, it appears to be becoming less organized with time. Convection is on the decline and moisture is being drawn northward across the Gulf. It's always easier to see a mid-level circulation when the convection dies off. Surface obs do not indicate any turning, no LLC forming. A 30% chance of development may be about right, but that's a 70% chance it won't develop.

One thing to take note of as far as models taking it to south Texas, the models do not see the upper-level low off the lower Texas coast correctly. The 12Z GFS, for instance, initializes the upper low about 180 miles south of where it actually is. That means the models may be too far south in taking the disturbance toward south Texas. Looks like another big rainmaker for the mid to upper Texas coast from late Thursday through Friday. But I don't expect more than a tropical disturbance moving ashore at this time.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#403 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:31 pm

ROCK wrote:I would think that ex-95L / ULL is drawing up this moisture to some extent. Once / IF 96L developes this will not inhibit it....if anything maybe a outflow channel...JMO


Yeah it indeed is, but that probably isn't a great thing given you have NW shear over the system and then mid level shear probably racing up over the Yucatan, leaves a bit of a mess.

As for the MLC, you can see it better now because the convection has weakened, it is weakening right now because of being overland.

I do still think we could see weak development of it before landfall but at the moment I still think it has some way to go yet.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#404 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:33 pm

wxman57 wrote:To me, it appears to be becoming less organized with time. Convection is on the decline and moisture is being drawn northward across the Gulf. It's always easier to see a mid-level circulation when the convection dies off. Surface obs do not indicate any turning, no LLC forming. A 30% chance of development may be about right, but that's a 70% chance it won't develop.

One thing to take note of as far as models taking it to south Texas, the models do not see the upper-level low off the lower Texas coast correctly. The 12Z GFS, for instance, initializes the upper low about 180 miles south of where it actually is. That means the models may be too far south in taking the disturbance toward south Texas. Looks like another big rainmaker for the mid to upper Texas coast from late Thursday through Friday. But I don't expect more than a tropical disturbance moving ashore at this time.

Image



Though I agree that it doesnt look all that great but as of yesterday I couldnt even see the MLC. Dont know if it had one then but it has one now. IMO, it looks more put together than it did in days.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#405 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:43 pm

ROCK wrote:
Though I agree that it doesnt look all that great but as of yesterday I couldnt even see the MLC. Dont know if it had one then but it has one now. IMO, it looks more put together than it did in days.


As I said, an MLC is much easier to see without all that convection blocking the view. Here's a graphic showing how the 12Z GFS improperly initialized the upper low in the NW Gulf. Water vapor shows the low about 180 miles north of where the GFS initialized it.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#406 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:44 pm

Rock, the MLC was quite obvious yesterday IMO, the only reason its more obvious now is the convection that was blocking it has died off, so you can actually see the swirling far easier at mid levels rather then being blocked out by deep convection.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#407 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:52 pm

KWT wrote:Rock, the MLC was quite obvious yesterday IMO, the only reason its more obvious now is the convection that was blocking it has died off, so you can actually see the swirling far easier at mid levels rather then being blocked out by deep convection.



Been looking at this thing too many times it seems. Yesterday is was a blob over the Yucatan. I didnt see any evidence of a MLC. Convection was all confined over land. I agree now that some of it has died off and displaced to the east, you can see it better. I give yall that...

I just think it looks more compact / structured now that it did yesterday....
0 likes   

xcool22

#408 Postby xcool22 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 2:59 pm

thanks wxman57
0 likes   

xcool22

#409 Postby xcool22 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:03 pm

:double:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145309
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#410 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:05 pm

Nooooooo!! ROCK,dont say it loud :eek:
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#411 Postby BigA » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:11 pm

This may have been mentioned before, but vorticity is on the wax at the northeastern tip of the Yucatan.

1500Z

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

1800Z

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Certainly close to the deepest of the convection.
0 likes   

xironman
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2522
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:53 pm
Location: NoVA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#412 Postby xironman » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:16 pm

The convection that is on the west coast of the Yucatan is starting to get pulled into the MLC. I think the land interaction has been far more injurious to this than any shear. We will see once it is out in the gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#413 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:17 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#414 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:18 pm

Image

24-48 hours
0 likes   

poof121
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 316
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Laurel, MD

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#415 Postby poof121 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:44 pm

0 likes   

poof121
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 316
Age: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 11:33 am
Location: Laurel, MD

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#416 Postby poof121 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:48 pm

Ship report 275 miles south of Grand Isle:

SHIP
Location: 25.1N 89.8W
07/06/2010 2000 UTC
Winds: ESE (120°) at 27.0 kts
Significant Wave Height: 4.9 ft
Dominant Wave period: 2 sec
Atmospheric Pressure: 29.71 in and steady (1005.9 mb)
Air Temperature: 82.4 °F
Water Temperature: 84.2 °F
Visibility: 11 nm

Lowest pressure I've seen all day...
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#417 Postby tolakram » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:54 pm

High speed visible loop. 30 frames, speed it up to get a good idea of the motion.

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... mframes=30

It really doesn't look all that bad, and i see numerous hints at a LLC starting to form.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#418 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:00 pm

MLC doesn't look at all bad right now. I think there is at least some weak turning to the NW of the MLC, its very weak now and is far from closed...but then again it could be simply the fact the SSE winds surging up intothe Gulf that gives it the apperence of turning, I'm not sure.

Will be interesting to see whether Dmax helps to strengthen the convection, esp as it should be over water by that time, it'll be key otherwise it'll be leaving things late to develop.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#419 Postby tailgater » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:07 pm

xironman wrote:The convection that is on the west coast of the Yucatan is starting to get pulled into the MLC. I think the land interaction has been far more injurious to this than any shear. We will see once it is out in the gulf.

Lack of convection over the Yucatan probably a result of the T-storms lasting well into the night, last nite leaving an overcast cloud deck and therefore a lack of heating. Donut look on the IR.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#420 Postby jasons2k » Tue Jul 06, 2010 4:10 pm

A few days ago I thought this was about to develop; I was very concerned for a TS or even a hurricane threat to the Mid-Upper Texas coast.

Now I just think this will be another sheared mess and if it ever gets a name, it'll resemble Fay (2002) but further south, near Brownsville.

My main (or only) concern with this is flooding rains.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest