ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

#461 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:42 pm

If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#462 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:43 pm

As far as track goes always follow the ULL..thats where the weakness is...its running interference for 96L....IMO... :D
0 likes   

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re:

#463 Postby redfish1 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:43 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.


is it possible for it to form tonight?
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#464 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:44 pm

HouTXmetro wrote:If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.



land acts like a brake...lets things catch up..tightens the envelope. Helps consolidates...anyway thats my theory..... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: Re:

#465 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:45 pm

redfish1 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.


is it possible for it to form tonight?


anything possible.....we have not seen RI this year in this basin...but we dont have model support so its kinda hard to tell....plenty of potential out there...
Last edited by ROCK on Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#466 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:46 pm

It looks decent enough but then again we've seen quite a few times systems that have looked superb and yet haven't quite got the internal structure to get upgraded.

That being said if the convection can develop over the center it'll certainly have a shot as upper conditions are ok for now anyway...certainly better then yesterday...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#467 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:46 pm

There is no doubt imo that this has all the energy to get going, I just don't know if time is on this ones side like Alex had with the stall.
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: Re:

#468 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:47 pm

redfish1 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.


is it possible for it to form tonight?


I can't say, I'm not a pro met but here is what to look for....

1. MLC moves NW and consolidates with the LL swirl to it's northwest.
2. Convection sustains and deepens over that area.

Perhaps somebody else can chime in on the chances of that happening tonight.
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#469 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:49 pm

Good observation ROCK...vorticity is not in short supply, seems to be two maxes on the north and south ends...

Image
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#470 Postby Ikester » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:49 pm

Ivanhater wrote:There is no doubt imo that this has all the energy to get going, I just don't know if time is on this ones side like Alex had with the stall.


Yes, but models are just simply a forecast "tool"; they are NOT the forecast. As we saw with Alex, there were several surprises that the models never picked up on or only one or two did and were dismissed as 'ludicrous.'
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#471 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:51 pm

Ikester wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:There is no doubt imo that this has all the energy to get going, I just don't know if time is on this ones side like Alex had with the stall.


Yes, but models are just simply a forecast "tool"; they are NOT the forecast. As we saw with Alex, there were several surprises that the models never picked up on or only one or two did and were dismissed as 'ludicrous.'


I dont think he was talking about the models....I think he is referring to real estate.. :D .we got what another 72 hrs roughly...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145322
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#472 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:56 pm

Up to 40%

TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 PM EDT TUE JUL 6 2010

FOR THE NORTH ATLANTIC...CARIBBEAN SEA AND THE GULF OF MEXICO...

SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS CONTINUE IN ASSOCIATION WITH A BROAD LOW
PRESSURE SYSTEM CENTERED OVER THE NORTHWESTERN YUCATAN PENINSULA OF
MEXICO NEAR MERIDA. THE LOW IS BEING INVESTIGATED THIS EVENING BY
TWO NOAA AIRCRAFT CONDUCTING A RESEARCH MISSION AROUND THE SYSTEM.
DATA FROM THIS MISSION INDICATES ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS REMAIN
CONDUCIVE FOR SOME DEVELOPMENT OF THIS DISTURBANCE DURING THE NEXT
COUPLE OF DAYS AS IT MOVES WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT 10 TO 15 MPH.
THERE IS A MEDIUM CHANCE...40 PERCENT...OF THIS SYSTEM BECOMING A
TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS. HEAVY RAINFALL AND
GUSTY WINDS ARE POSSIBLE OVER PORTIONS OF THE YUCATAN PENINSULA
DURING THE NEXT DAY OR SO.

ELSEWHERE...TROPICAL CYCLONE FORMATION IS NOT EXPECTED DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS.

$$
FORECASTER LANDSEA/STEWART

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

I-wall
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 5:24 pm

Re: Re:

#473 Postby I-wall » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:56 pm

ROCK wrote:
redfish1 wrote:
HouTXmetro wrote:If this MLC holds together and a TD results this would be yet ANOTHER example of the Yucatan AIDING development of a weak System.


is it possible for it to form tonight?


anything possible.....we have not seen RI this year in this basin...but we dont have model support so its kinda hard to tell....plenty of potential out there...


Didnt Alex go through RI immediately before landfall?
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#474 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:01 pm

Not surprised at all to see an increase to 40% with the P-3 data.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#475 Postby redfish1 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:02 pm

srainhoutx wrote:Not surprised at all to see an increase to 40% with the P-3 data.


will this data be in the models tonight?
0 likes   

User avatar
chzzdekr81
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Orange, Texas (SETX)
Contact:

#476 Postby chzzdekr81 » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:04 pm

So is Houston pretty much out of this?
0 likes   
I survived Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#477 Postby KWT » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:12 pm

Yep not surprising they've upped it to 40%. Interesting to see the wind shift round to a WNW to the west of the Yucatan, there may well be a LLC or at least something close to it a little to the south of the MLC...

Probably will be enough time for development if it can pull itself together, as the NHC said conditions aloft aren't too bad and have improved alot over the last 12hrs.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#478 Postby BigA » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:18 pm

What data did the planes find that justify a more pro-development analysis? Did the planes sample the disturbance, or did they look at the environmental conditions around the disturbance and conclude that there is not too much wind shear, dry air, et cetera?
0 likes   

Nederlander
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1250
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
Location: Conroe, TX

Re: Re:

#479 Postby Nederlander » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:22 pm

I-wall wrote:
Didnt Alex go through RI immediately before landfall?


RI is classified as a pressure drop of at least 42 mbs in a 24 hr. period..

To my recollection I dont think Alex came close to that..
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re:

#480 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jul 06, 2010 7:22 pm

BigA wrote:What data did the planes find that justify a more pro-development analysis? Did the planes sample the disturbance, or did they look at the environmental conditions around the disturbance and conclude that there is not too much wind shear, dry air, et cetera?


I have a feeling that 1001mb reading waved a red flag
0 likes   
Michael


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests