ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
But in the models defense Ike had a long trip to Texas.
But in the models defense Ike had a long trip to Texas.
0 likes
My forecast for today... Open a window! Brought to you by sarcasm
- Annie Oakley
- Category 5
- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 12:54 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
siriusonellc. wrote:Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
You go Texas! Especially the likes of Brazoria Co. On the number one Tier........
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Boxed-in by cool water north of Yucatan, land interaction over Yucatan, and a ULL punching in from the west. Should rebound if it can get over water. (Maybe)
0 likes
- StarmanHDB
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 201
- Age: 60
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:59 pm
- Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
OK, I gotta go to bed too. I'm sorry I can't post the data, but this has quite positive SSTs, low shear and great mid-level moisture for the next day or two. There is no reason why it shouldn't be a TS by tomorrow night or Thursday morning. I still think it has the same problem that Alex did - it will be too much stretched out on a north south axis at first and that will hinder it from getting past TS status until it consolidates back to the south if it ever does. Just IMHO.
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
- latitude_20
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:46 am
- Location: Tulum, Mexico
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Even though convection looks to have taken a bit of a cliff-dive, looks to me as if the LLC and MLC have consolidated, and apparent circulation is still fairly significant. Thoughts?
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
- Location: Conroe, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
siriusonellc. wrote:Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
welcome aboard, I live in Brazoria County myself.. there are a few of us on here from southern Houston (and a couple from the north side of town).. But as far as counting anything out, I think it depends on whats happening.. Every situation is different. I have learned over the years on this forum to trust #1 the pro-mets and #2 the models/obs .. I trust the NHC with track, but as far development and intensity, its hard for me to put a lot of stock into them. I understand they are under a microscope, but IMO they are pressured by outlying factors (the media, etc.) instead of pure data or obs.. 95L is a perfect example.. But I dont want to get into that on here.. My point is, its good that you never count anything out, but a lot of times ive seen people just outright deny the obs or what the promets have to say just because their 'eyes' see something that really isnt there.. a system can look really nice on satellite, but when you take into account other factors other than appearance, it makes it a lot easier to at least have reasoning when it comes to chances of a storms development.. In 96L's case it seems like more of a timing issue to me than its environment.. it just isnt structurally sound..
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1250
- Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 4:28 pm
- Location: Conroe, TX
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
latitude_20 wrote:Even though convection looks to have taken a bit of a cliff-dive, looks to me as if the LLC and MLC have consolidated, and apparent circulation is still fairly significant. Thoughts?
I dont think theres been any surface obs to support an LLC.. unless i missed that somewhere (which is very possible)
Edit: I also dont see how its getting its act together? Everytime I look at IR imagery, there is less and less convection.. I know its been over land (the MLC).. but even after entering the GoM, its going to be in relatively cooler waters (I assume this is because of Alex)...
Last edited by Nederlander on Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
- Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Nederlander wrote:siriusonellc. wrote:Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
welcome aboard, I live in Brazoria County myself.. there are a few of us on here from southern Houston (and a couple from the north side of town).. But as far as counting anything out, I think it depends on whats happening.. Every situation is different. I have learned over the years on this forum to trust #1 the pro-mets and #2 the models/obs .. I trust the NHC with track, but as far development and intensity, its hard for me to put a lot of stock into them. I understand they are under a microscope, but IMO they are pressured by outlying factors (the media, etc.) instead of pure data or obs.. 95L is a perfect example.. But I dont want to get into that on here.. My point is, its good that you never count anything out, but a lot of times ive seen people just outright deny the obs or what the promets have to say just because their 'eyes' see something that really isnt there.. a system can look really nice on satellite, but when you take into account other factors other than appearance, it makes it a lot easier to at least have reasoning when it comes to chances of a storms development.. In 96L's case it seems like more of a timing issue to me than its environment.. it just isnt structurally sound..
Well said. Good night.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Anyone from Matagorda? You know, that one county just the SW of Brazoria.
I know, it's the couty that know one cares about. In fact, whenever I see that a storm is tracking towards our county, the weather guy says it going towards Matagorda Bay. Like we are just all about a bay.
I know, it's the couty that know one cares about. In fact, whenever I see that a storm is tracking towards our county, the weather guy says it going towards Matagorda Bay. Like we are just all about a bay.
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
really dont understand the cool water theory...this map shows potential for a cat 3 right off the coast. All things equal of course.
http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
convection is waning tonight which I had thought it would be building. Proves I know nothing about TS genesis.....
still has the look of a vigorious MLC but if it cannot tap into the surface its all for not....reminds me of Humberto....just a MLC working its way up the coast until the final moments it found its LLC during D-max...
http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL
convection is waning tonight which I had thought it would be building. Proves I know nothing about TS genesis.....

0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Nederlander wrote:siriusonellc. wrote:Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
welcome aboard, I live in Brazoria County myself.. there are a few of us on here from southern Houston (and a couple from the north side of town).. But as far as counting anything out, I think it depends on whats happening.. Every situation is different. I have learned over the years on this forum to trust #1 the pro-mets and #2 the models/obs .. I trust the NHC with track, but as far development and intensity, its hard for me to put a lot of stock into them. I understand they are under a microscope, but IMO they are pressured by outlying factors (the media, etc.) instead of pure data or obs.. 95L is a perfect example.. But I dont want to get into that on here.. My point is, its good that you never count anything out, but a lot of times ive seen people just outright deny the obs or what the promets have to say just because their 'eyes' see something that really isnt there.. a system can look really nice on satellite, but when you take into account other factors other than appearance, it makes it a lot easier to at least have reasoning when it comes to chances of a storms development.. In 96L's case it seems like more of a timing issue to me than its environment.. it just isnt structurally sound..
I agree. It looks like poo.
0 likes
My forecast for today... Open a window! Brought to you by sarcasm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Duddy wrote:Anyone from Matagorda? You know, that one county just the SW of Brazoria.
I know, it's the couty that know one cares about. In fact, whenever I see that a storm is tracking towards our county, the weather guy says it going towards Matagorda Bay. Like we are just all about a bay.
Nederland and AFM are from Pearland... about as close as you can get I guess....still want to visit the Indianola marker one day...thats around your area....
sorry OT....
0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Pearland? Me too!
0 likes
My forecast for today... Open a window! Brought to you by sarcasm
- Houstonia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 829
- Age: 60
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
- Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
Nederlander wrote:siriusonellc. wrote:Either way after Ike and what I went through here in Texas (Brazoria County) I'm def not counting anything out. Esp with (from what I remember) The difficulty the models had with it.
welcome aboard, I live in Brazoria County myself.. there are a few of us on here from southern Houston (and a couple from the north side of town)
Southwest Houston (Sharpstown) chiming in!! We may have tons of low-rent apartments here, but we LOVE our tree-lined neighborhoods.

(house - post Ike)

0 likes
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
I remember scenes like that all too well.
0 likes
My forecast for today... Open a window! Brought to you by sarcasm
-
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:53 pm
Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION
0 likes
My forecast for today... Open a window! Brought to you by sarcasm
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests