ATL : TROPICAL DEPRESSION BONNIE - MODELS

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#321 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:45 pm

Actually looks a bit east of P'Cola near Navarre!
0 likes   

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#322 Postby AdamFirst » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:46 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Now that I know the OFCI is the internal NHC track, it is very interesting that you and the NHC have very similar thoughts at this point. HPC is in agreement as well.


That makes my weather all the more interesting if it follows that one.
0 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

Rainband

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#323 Postby Rainband » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:46 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here's a plot I made of the 18Z models taking out some that won't do well here (BAMs, climo models, NAM). I did include the NOGAPS, though it's often the worst-performing model. It is on the far left of the other guidance, almost. The only one that misses south Florida. Note the 18Z NHC preliminary forecast taking it into Pensacola.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/models.gif
well I really don't like that cone i am in the middle. There isn't a center yet so time to wait and see. I think it all depends on where and when it forms and how the high holds. anything in the GOM right now will make the oil situation worse. that's the sad part.


*edited by southerngale to remove the IMG tags
0 likes   

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#324 Postby SFLcane » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:50 pm

Wxman57 can you plot the 00z models on the same map? Thanks so much.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re:

#325 Postby Ivanhater » Tue Jul 20, 2010 7:51 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:Actually looks a bit east of P'Cola near Navarre!


Well Metro P'cola :D
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
fwbbreeze
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 896
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2004 10:09 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

Re: Re:

#326 Postby fwbbreeze » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:05 pm

Ivanhater wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:Actually looks a bit east of P'Cola near Navarre!


Well Metro P'cola :D


Greater Pensacola/Fort Walton Beach Metro area :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#327 Postby Bocadude85 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:06 pm

wxman57 wrote:Here's a plot I made of the 18Z models taking out some that won't do well here (BAMs, climo models, NAM). I did include the NOGAPS, though it's often the worst-performing model. It is on the far left of the other guidance, almost. The only one that misses south Florida. Note the 18Z NHC preliminary forecast taking it into Pensacola.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/models.gif



I don't know why but I just have this feeling that the models are to far north... I am still thinking south of Florida.. but I could be wrong


*edited by southerngale to remove the IMG tags
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#328 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:09 pm

I don't know Rainband, it could actually help to add oxygen to the water with the upwelling and break up what oil is left out there as well. With it now capped we are in much better shape anyway.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#329 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:18 pm

The 00z "official" track HURAKAN posted on the other thread looks to be a slight bit north and east of the 18z track (link to HURAKAN's image: http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/4657/97l.jpg ).

If this NHC early track were to actually come to be, then that would put quite a bit of southern and central Florida on the "dirty" side of the storm. Cities like Miami, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers and Tampa could be hit particular hard if this path played out (especially if Bonnie was a hurricane), with cities further north such as Palm Beach, Melbourne and Orlando also being impacted by some of the storm's outer effects, including the threat for heavy rain bands and tornadoes. Not a pretty way to end the week if such a scenario verified.


Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#330 Postby Blown Away » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:20 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Here's a plot I made of the 18Z models taking out some that won't do well here (BAMs, climo models, NAM). I did include the NOGAPS, though it's often the worst-performing model. It is on the far left of the other guidance, almost. The only one that misses south Florida. Note the 18Z NHC preliminary forecast taking it into Pensacola.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/models.gif



I don't know why but I just have this feeling that the models are to far north... I am still thinking south of Florida.. but I could be wrong


The circulation has moved very little today and the longer it takes to get moving west the sooner it will feel the eroding ridge in a few days. The circulation center has relocated slightly east since 18z. We have seen the models slightly trend east today, this morning models targeted Keys to La/Miss and this evening models are targeting SFL/Panhandle. I believe this will end up being a 1995 Erin type track, only if 97 develops.


*edited by southerngale to remove the IMG tags
Last edited by Blown Away on Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#331 Postby southerngale » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:21 pm

Please remove the IMG tags when quoting posts with an image. The image will still be clickable in the post. Thanks.

wxman57's graphic was on this page 4 times. It's just not necessary and loads slow for those still on dial-up, etc. :)
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#332 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:24 pm

we wait on the EURO since it doesnt post with the dynamics....consensus though for every other model looks pretty straight forward.....but if the EURO doesnt jump on board tonight then it will have to weighed accordingly....JMO of course...
0 likes   

StormClouds63
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 583
Age: 62
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 11:56 am
Location: Southwest Louisiana

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#333 Postby StormClouds63 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:26 pm

Amen to the poster who pointed out that SST are but one factor in development and/or intensification. Upper air patterns are much more significant. Obviously, some of the models are seeing shear or dry air in the central GOM. Let's hope that verifies.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re:

#334 Postby jlauderdal » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:33 pm

southerngale wrote:Please remove the IMG tags when quoting posts with an image. The image will still be clickable in the post. Thanks.

wxman57's graphic was on this page 4 times. It's just not necessary and loads slow for those still on dial-up, etc. :)



For those on dial-up, PM me because i have some quick loading 48 frame sat movies for your viewing pleasure, :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#335 Postby southerngale » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:52 pm

We just don't need the images repeated in quotes, jlauderdal. It's fine to post images, of course. If you think your 48 frame sat movies are too long to post on here as an image though, just post the link. :)
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
A1A
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 1:03 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#336 Postby A1A » Tue Jul 20, 2010 8:59 pm

I don't mean to digress to web browser issues but I believe this to be true:

If you use the same graphic bullets and arrows throughout your page, you can enhance your page's appearance, but you won't add any additional time to your web page load time. When you reuse an image, your image only has to load once. When the image has loaded, it will instantly be displayed in all of the other locations.


Generally, when commenting to a past image posts if it is not reposted you will totally lose your repost purpose! As fast as these threads move and as many images are posted, how many of us go back and even if we tried to it would be confusing with other images. As far as I'm concerned, if you don't repost the image, you are just wasting your time even referring to it or doing the follow up post. I'm not going to get your point.
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re:

#337 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:17 pm

ROCK wrote:we wait on the EURO since it doesnt post with the dynamics....consensus though for every other model looks pretty straight forward.....but if the EURO doesnt jump on board tonight then it will have to weighed accordingly....JMO of course...


HaHa,I agree.....the proof is in the pudding but let's not start a debate. :lol:
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

jbgreig
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:42 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#338 Postby jbgreig » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:35 pm

A1A wrote:I don't mean to digress to web browser issues but I believe this to be true:

If you use the same graphic bullets and arrows throughout your page, you can enhance your page's appearance, but you won't add any additional time to your web page load time. When you reuse an image, your image only has to load once. When the image has loaded, it will instantly be displayed in all of the other locations.

A1A wrote:Generally, when commenting to a past image posts if it is not reposted you will totally lose your repost purpose! As fast as these threads move and as many images are posted, how many of us go back and even if we tried to it would be confusing with other images. As far as I'm concerned, if you don't repost the image, you are just wasting your time even referring to it or doing the follow up post. I'm not going to get your point.



Yes, this is true. Each image will only load once per page... And will likely be cached on subsequent pages.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#339 Postby southerngale » Tue Jul 20, 2010 9:51 pm

A1A... that's not what I was told, but that's good to know, assuming it's true. Regardless, that was only part of the reason for the request, which we've made for many years. Mainly, it's not necessary and just clutters up the thread. If you're quoting a post with an image from several pages back, that's one thing, but when it's just a couple of posts up, you honestly think it's confusing? It's just not necessary to be on the same page 4 times, thus the reason for my original post. Besides, it's not like the image isn't there when you remove the IMG tags. It can still be clicked for anyone who wants to see it again and doesn't feel like scrolling up a few posts.

Speaking of cluttering up the thread, we're way off models now, so if you want to talk about it further, please PM me. :) We're not going to ban anyone over it... it's just a request to help the threads run smoother.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

Patrick99
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1770
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: SW Broward, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 97L - MODELS

#340 Postby Patrick99 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:15 pm

Wow, that NOGAPS plot would be a really bad solution for the middle Keys...that's some good time over really warm water if that verified.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests