ATL: Ex-DANIELLE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#121 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:14 pm

The east coast trough is much weaker this run and the ridge is extended farther west.. also a good deal slower too
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#122 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:16 pm

What I find really interesting is effectivly the small E.Vortex does a Fujiwara around the bigger one and when its coming up from the south to north 95L tracks near due west, then it lifts out as the small vortex comes round the other side, its clear as day on the 12z Vort map!

Love those sort of small scale interactions.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#123 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:16 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:The east coast trough is much weaker this run and the ridge is extended farther west.. also a good deal slower too



wow, interesting, hopefully someone will post the model runs
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#124 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:18 pm

Heading close to NW between 102-114hrs....

In fact 24hr motion between 90-114hrs is nearly exactly NW, up at 21/50.
Last edited by KWT on Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re:

#125 Postby ColinDelia » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:19 pm

KWT wrote:18z GFS keeps a double Vort structure by 42hrs:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... v_042m.gif


That's really interesting.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#126 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:23 pm

Motion between 114-138hrs is still due NW...BUT it is slowing right down and I don't think the upper trough is strong enough to lift it out...but it probably is far enough north now that unless a decent upper ridge builds it recurves...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re:

#127 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:26 pm

KWT wrote:Motion between 114-138hrs is still due NW...BUT it is slowing right down and I don't think the upper trough is strong enough to lift it out...but it probably is far enough north now that unless a decent upper ridge builds it recurves...



Since model maps aren't being posted anymore, does anyone have a link to them?
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: Re:

#128 Postby srainhoutx » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:26 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:

Since model maps aren't being posted anymore, does anyone have a link to them?


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... arib.shtml
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#129 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:27 pm

Thanks srainhoutx
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#130 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:28 pm

Vort map at 156hrs:

http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... v_156m.gif

Steering is pretty slack but a slow drift still to the NW....
Last edited by KWT on Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#131 Postby USTropics » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:29 pm

For those who are on mobile devices or do not have access to the images:

48 hours
Image

72 hours
Image

96 hours
Image

120 hours
Image

144 hours
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#132 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:33 pm

Motion between 150-174hrs....NNW but the 12hrs between 162-174 actually shows a slight east of north motion...

Recurving from the looks of things...so the 18z GFS is having none of it.

This run makes it perfectly clear it doesn't matter how weak the trough is its the fact its there in the first place and therefore a hurricane will get picked up by it nearly every time...actually east of the 12z run!

Trough connection isn't amazing strong though so it may stall out again before another upper trough comes along.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2635
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

#133 Postby USTropics » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:35 pm

Steering currents look to break down at 120 hours as the trough begins to lift out. The ridge appears to try and build back in but the system is too deep and far enough north that it continues to move (at a very slow pace) N/NW for the next 48-72 hours.

144 hours
Image

168 hours
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#134 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:37 pm

Yeah, if the system was at say 20N or even 23N for example, the GFS set-up for 180hrs would sure suggest it needs watching, there is a big weakening of the upper troughing yet further by 180hrs to the point where its nearly a nonplayer but by that time the damage is done.

I still see no reason to buy into the ECM idea just yet, need to see if it backs off or actually supports its ideas on the 00z tomorrow!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#135 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:40 pm

wxman57 wrote:The Euro usually doesn't forecast systems to be too strong, and it's not backing off on development by any means. It's not so good with intensity.



I'm glad to hear a promet agree with this notion i've been having. DEFINITELY would like to see it remembered by all.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11153
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#136 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:42 pm

Noticing the pattern change. The GFS lifts out the trough and is replaced by ridging. I could care less the GFS has this gaining so much latitude so early. Most likely it is breaking down the ridge too fast anyway, giving the bias. So you tweak some biases out and you have a totally different situation.

It would have to gain some pretty hefty latitude for that trough to lift it out...the GFS has been too fast with development and gaining latitude for the past 3 days. We should already have Danielle by now if the trusted the GFS 2 days ago...
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#137 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:42 pm

00Z 500mb Vorticity @ 138 Hours
Image

18Z 500mb Vorticity @ 120 Hours
Image
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re:

#138 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:42 pm

KWT wrote:I know there is error sometimes in the models....BUT not only would the models have to do a total 180 for this to be a threat to land (and inside 144hrs, thats not going to happen even if the troughs are overdone)

We have what maybe 2000 miles of room for error, I'd personally still expect recurve even if it got quite alot further west then progged!
I've already said I think the models are too far east as well by the way, thats why I think Bermuda is at real risk, but we are a very very long way away from even a hint at a landfall...not even one ensemble member from the GFS gets close and none of the other models get close either.

Weatherfreak000...I'm not jumping the gun my friend...the models ALL show EXACTLY the same picture...I really don't see why people are denying the total agreement!



Remember you posted this this morning KWT? And now the Euro has a land threat......as I said...jumping the gun kills you in the tropics.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - MODELS

#139 Postby SouthFloridawx » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:43 pm

A trough to the East of Nova Scotia isn't as strong as it was last night.

Am I doing that right? I want to compare the run from last night @ 00Z to today's 18Z run. So I would subtract 18 hours from last nights, if I wanted to view the same time frame? Only it's 18 hours earlier, because 18 hours have surpassed... Why is this so hard!!! :lol: :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#140 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 20, 2010 5:47 pm

Weatherfreak000 wrote:[

Remember you posted this this morning KWT? And now the Euro has a land threat......as I said...jumping the gun kills you in the tropics.


Yeah its one model for one run and the ECM did weaken it down to a TD...sure if that were to happen then fair enough as I said it could very well miss the trough, its not a huge weakness...if this one gets close to hurricane strength though the GFS solution shows exactly what will happen...and FWIW the GFS looks perhaps even a smidge weaker with the trough then even the ECM at 96hrs...

I want to see at least two more ECM runs show a similar evolution before I get too interested in, coul just as easily be an outlier as anything else.

However your right things are still wide open, I may have jumped the gun but the weight of the models are still heavily on the recurve idea.

Oh and FWIW, the eCM moves WNW until 96hrs when it starts to weaken down to 1013mbs and guess what, thats when the westerly motion happens...

I'm not suggesting a ridge won't build in, pretty clear it will now but the system could be up at 30N by the time that happens if the models are right.

One thing to watch, if this one takes a long time to get going and stays rooted to the spot, chances of a threat to land massivly surge up given the change in pattern.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests