What is the future of this season?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
Re: What is the future of this season?
Regarding seasonal activity, I'm going with persistence at this point.
0 likes
Re:
Maybe for the Pacific - cooler ocean temps.
For the Atlantic, I think this site may offer some hints:
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real- ... k/sal.html
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
I'm starting to believe that there isn't going to be a "switch" that turns on that causes the tropics to become hyperactive.....I'm thinking there will just be the occasional storm from now until the end of the season....
I'm not too sure when the MJO becomes unfavorable again but activity might drop off once that happens...
I'm not too sure when the MJO becomes unfavorable again but activity might drop off once that happens...
0 likes
Re: What is the future of this season?
>>I'm starting to believe that there isn't going to be a "switch" that turns on that causes the tropics to become hyperactive.....I'm thinking there will just be the occasional storm from now until the end of the season....
You might be right short-term- but probably not overall. The 500mb anomalies in the NE are going back to what we've been seeing all along. However, the origins are Pacific instead of polar. The west is about to warm up again, so it's not happening in the next few days. I think that's one of the keys. However, you can see heights building at 200mb, so it's possible that the block is building. However, NAO doesn't look to go positive until after the 1st.
200mb:
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/intras ... anim.shtml
500mb:
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/intras ... anim.shtml
>>I'm not too sure when the MJO becomes unfavorable again but activity might drop off once that happens...
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... l#forecast
Still, we will probably be to the E or F storm if the Gulf system cranks near Texas by Tuesday a week (8/31/10). That's no longer off the pace.
You might be right short-term- but probably not overall. The 500mb anomalies in the NE are going back to what we've been seeing all along. However, the origins are Pacific instead of polar. The west is about to warm up again, so it's not happening in the next few days. I think that's one of the keys. However, you can see heights building at 200mb, so it's possible that the block is building. However, NAO doesn't look to go positive until after the 1st.
200mb:
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/intras ... anim.shtml
500mb:
http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/intras ... anim.shtml
>>I'm not too sure when the MJO becomes unfavorable again but activity might drop off once that happens...
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/p ... l#forecast
Still, we will probably be to the E or F storm if the Gulf system cranks near Texas by Tuesday a week (8/31/10). That's no longer off the pace.
0 likes
>>Still, we will probably be to the E or F storm if the Gulf system cranks near Texas by Tuesday a week (8/31/10). That's no longer off the pace.
Storms as of 8/31
1998 -Earl
1995 -Jerry
2005 - Lee
1950 - Dog
1969 - Francella
1999 - Emily
FWIW, European 8-10 day showing positive NAO by the 1st of September and also a surge of heights into the maritimes which would be the strongest block yet to date. Transient? Who knows? Building? Who knows? That's your key to 2010's switch.
Storms as of 8/31
1998 -Earl
1995 -Jerry
2005 - Lee
1950 - Dog
1969 - Francella
1999 - Emily
FWIW, European 8-10 day showing positive NAO by the 1st of September and also a surge of heights into the maritimes which would be the strongest block yet to date. Transient? Who knows? Building? Who knows? That's your key to 2010's switch.

0 likes
Nothing too major though at upper levels Steve, so that high pressure possibly would buckle at the first sight of a low pressure system probably despite looking quite decent on the general maps.
Still I can't see this pattern being quite as strong as it has been, its pretty uncommon for the pattern to hold this long in August IMO.
Still I can't see this pattern being quite as strong as it has been, its pretty uncommon for the pattern to hold this long in August IMO.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
>>Nothing too major though at upper levels Steve, so that high pressure possibly would buckle at the first sight of a low pressure system probably despite looking quite decent on the general maps.
Agreed that it's nothing drastic, but there is evolution between now and the end of the month. If it sticks, after one or two push-backs, late summer pattern can build in the first week of September. I only have access to 10 day ECMWF, but the average heights are higher than the GFS which pulses back and forth through what we've been seeing through 384. ECMWF ensembles don't bring the NAO as + but are moving toward positive at the end of the month. GFS Ensembles actually go positive. It can go either way or do something else but there isn't a strong enough of a signal yet. That's something else about this season, except for the SOI, there aren't any particularly dominant pattern tip-off signals. La Nina is there, but even that's not super strong. So it's been harder to time blocks, MJO, etc. this year. Weaker signals and weaker systems thus far.
Link to 12Z ECMWF NAO Prediction:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... mwfnao.gif
Link to 12Z GFS Ensemble NAO Prediction:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... ensnao.gif
Agreed that it's nothing drastic, but there is evolution between now and the end of the month. If it sticks, after one or two push-backs, late summer pattern can build in the first week of September. I only have access to 10 day ECMWF, but the average heights are higher than the GFS which pulses back and forth through what we've been seeing through 384. ECMWF ensembles don't bring the NAO as + but are moving toward positive at the end of the month. GFS Ensembles actually go positive. It can go either way or do something else but there isn't a strong enough of a signal yet. That's something else about this season, except for the SOI, there aren't any particularly dominant pattern tip-off signals. La Nina is there, but even that's not super strong. So it's been harder to time blocks, MJO, etc. this year. Weaker signals and weaker systems thus far.
Link to 12Z ECMWF NAO Prediction:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... mwfnao.gif
Link to 12Z GFS Ensemble NAO Prediction:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... ensnao.gif
0 likes
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
Assuming we're talking Atlantic...
CSU still forecast 18 named storms on August 4th (vs 9.6 normal). Considerably above average. The third named storm of the year typically comes on Aug 13th, the 4th on Aug 23rd. Assuming we get Danielle in the next two days we have had an exactly normal season this year. Personally I don't think the slower start than expected is for any good reason. Though with global totals so low the past few years I am suspicious. The Pacific is supposed to be slow so that is part of it but to be honest I am not familiar with the other basins. I should really research more on that.
CSU's method explains 50% of the variance in season totals. That still leaves 50% unknown so there is certainly room to be wrong here.
18 storms would still be the 5th highest total ever. I find it difficult to forecast a top 5 season despite the incredible known conditions. How many storms were lost to the season with no storms from August 4th to 21st? I can see shaving 2 or 3 off the total. I'll take 15 named storms for the year. Still tied for 9th all time. Still way above normal.
CSU still forecast 18 named storms on August 4th (vs 9.6 normal). Considerably above average. The third named storm of the year typically comes on Aug 13th, the 4th on Aug 23rd. Assuming we get Danielle in the next two days we have had an exactly normal season this year. Personally I don't think the slower start than expected is for any good reason. Though with global totals so low the past few years I am suspicious. The Pacific is supposed to be slow so that is part of it but to be honest I am not familiar with the other basins. I should really research more on that.
CSU's method explains 50% of the variance in season totals. That still leaves 50% unknown so there is certainly room to be wrong here.
18 storms would still be the 5th highest total ever. I find it difficult to forecast a top 5 season despite the incredible known conditions. How many storms were lost to the season with no storms from August 4th to 21st? I can see shaving 2 or 3 off the total. I'll take 15 named storms for the year. Still tied for 9th all time. Still way above normal.
0 likes
Despite what I said about this being a 12-13NS type season there is still in theory time for a 16NS type season if things do really explode like the ECM long range expects...
Probably will see a hyperactive season in terms of ACE still, I was onboard with a 160-200 type season and I think despite probably lower NS September will probably provide a large ramp-up to the ACE....
Probably will see a hyperactive season in terms of ACE still, I was onboard with a 160-200 type season and I think despite probably lower NS September will probably provide a large ramp-up to the ACE....
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re:
KWT wrote:Despite what I said about this being a 12-13NS type season there is still in theory time for a 16NS type season if things do really explode like the ECM long range expects...
Probably will see a hyperactive season in terms of ACE still, I was onboard with a 160-200 type season and I think despite probably lower NS September will probably provide a large ramp-up to the ACE....
Okay, I have a stupid question, what the heck does ACE mean, and why is it significant? I've seen the threads here on ACE, but I've been too ashamed to ask what the heck it means...
0 likes
Accumulated Cyclone Energy...
Its a much better measure of how busy a season is then just pure numbers.
For example 2007 had higher NS then say 1950, but 1950 had stronger systems that lasted longer and thus notched up more ACE then 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accumulated_cyclone_energy
Its also a large part of what defines a hyperactive season.
Its a much better measure of how busy a season is then just pure numbers.
For example 2007 had higher NS then say 1950, but 1950 had stronger systems that lasted longer and thus notched up more ACE then 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accumulated_cyclone_energy
Its also a large part of what defines a hyperactive season.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re:
KWT wrote:Accumulated Cyclone Energy...
Its a much better measure of how busy a season is then just pure numbers.
For example 2007 had higher NS then say 1950, but 1950 had stronger systems that lasted longer and thus notched up more ACE then 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accumulated_cyclone_energy
Its also a large part of what defines a hyperactive season.
Thanks KWT, I'll have to read up on that link you posted....
0 likes
Re:
KWT wrote:Accumulated Cyclone Energy...
Its a much better measure of how busy a season is then just pure numbers.
For example 2007 had higher NS then say 1950, but 1950 had stronger systems that lasted longer and thus notched up more ACE then 2007.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accumulated_cyclone_energy
Its also a large part of what defines a hyperactive season.
I made a post about ACE per a storm. Some seasons like 1950, 1961, 1998, and 1999 have high ACE per a storm, while seasons like 2005 have about average ACE per a storm, while 2007 had a low ACE per a storm.
0 likes
GFS Ensembles trending more positive for NAO in a week (6z 8/21). Let's see if it holds for a while.
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... ensnao.gif
00Z
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... ensnao.gif
00Z
0 likes
- ColinDelia
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
- Location: The Beach, FL
Re: What is the future of this season?
In the short to mid-term:
"MJO CONDITIONS REMAIN FAVORABLE ACROSS THE
FAR EASTERN TROPICAL ATLANTIC/AFRICA...WITH THE EWP MODEL SHOWING
THIS PERSISTING INTO THE END OF THE MONTH. THE CFS IS MORE
OPTIMISTIC...SHOWING FAVORABLE TO NEAR NEUTRAL CONDITIONS TO
PERSIST INTO THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER. THUS FAR...THE CFS HAS BEEN
DOING A BETTER JOB THAN THE EWP MODEL. "
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/fxca20.html
"MJO CONDITIONS REMAIN FAVORABLE ACROSS THE
FAR EASTERN TROPICAL ATLANTIC/AFRICA...WITH THE EWP MODEL SHOWING
THIS PERSISTING INTO THE END OF THE MONTH. THE CFS IS MORE
OPTIMISTIC...SHOWING FAVORABLE TO NEAR NEUTRAL CONDITIONS TO
PERSIST INTO THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER. THUS FAR...THE CFS HAS BEEN
DOING A BETTER JOB THAN THE EWP MODEL. "
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/discussions/fxca20.html
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
I'd still bet the ACE will get us close to the hyperactive range though CZ, esp if we get a couple of storms like Danielle and say a 4/5 in the Caribbean in October as well thrown in for good measure.
We'll see, too early to know whats going to happen!
We'll see, too early to know whats going to happen!
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5
- Posts: 5194
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
Re:
KWT wrote:I'd still bet the ACE will get us close to the hyperactive range though CZ, esp if we get a couple of storms like Danielle and say a 4/5 in the Caribbean in October as well thrown in for good measure.
We'll see, too early to know whats going to happen!
I know some make a big deal of ACE, but when an active season is called for usually they don't disclose ACE to the public. Usually they equate an active season to how many storms form, so that's what I'm doing s well.....
If they want to start using ACE fine, but they should also stop calling for a specific amount of storms if high ACE is the only thing that defines a hyperactive season.
0 likes
True but they do mention ACE and usually that is whats used offically to define a normal/above/below and a hyperactive season usually, though really its a combo of all those factors.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, Hypercane_Kyle, Noots, WaveBreaking, wwizard and 43 guests