Vis loop:

Latest microwave:

Shear map from CIMSS:

Moderator: S2k Moderators
StormingB81 wrote:I still think its odd how someone calls it a TD and others don't for awhile and sometimes none at all.
KWT wrote:StormingB81 wrote:I still think its odd how someone calls it a TD and others don't for awhile and sometimes none at all.
Yeah I've gotta admit the WPAC can be real confusing for things like that, because there are what 3 different agencies at least who operate in the WPAC?
Chacor wrote:There are 14 members of the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee; each one of them (less FS Micronesia, which relies on the US's NWS) issues their own analyses and forecasts. Each is official at a national level; at a regional level the JMA's information should be treated as official.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with agencies disagreeing on the existence of a tropical depression; it happens in the North Atlantic too as France often does not agree with the NHC's assessment of tropical cyclones east of 33°W (which is TPC's High Seas warning boundary).
Typhoon Hunter wrote:The ones I personally uses when I'm intercepting a typhoon are JMA, CWB, HKO and JTWC in that order of preference.
supercane wrote:Chacor wrote:There are 14 members of the ESCAP/WMO Typhoon Committee; each one of them (less FS Micronesia, which relies on the US's NWS) issues their own analyses and forecasts. Each is official at a national level; at a regional level the JMA's information should be treated as official.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with agencies disagreeing on the existence of a tropical depression; it happens in the North Atlantic too as France often does not agree with the NHC's assessment of tropical cyclones east of 33°W (which is TPC's High Seas warning boundary).
If this is directed at me
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests