wxman57 wrote:European doesn't like Charleston:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... _loop.html
Even my area may feel some nasty direct effects if that verifies, huge system!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:European doesn't like Charleston:
http://raleighwx.easternuswx.com/models ... _loop.html
Ikester wrote:If it hit Jacksonville, that would be a horrifying scenario. Jacksonville is one of the few cities along hurricane prone US coastline that has NOT been hit by a hurricane in a VERY long time. Tampa being the other. I think the damage would be magnified in those areas and evacuations would be a nightmare.
KWT wrote:The thing that we can gleam from the ensembles though is there is very good support within the ECM own members of a large threat to the E.Coast somewhere...
ronjon wrote:KWT wrote:The thing that we can gleam from the ensembles though is there is very good support within the ECM own members of a large threat to the E.Coast somewhere...
Based on the ensemble run, KWT, I think it is entirely plausible for the system to even move west into FL or through the straits. Way out there but the trend appears to be more ridging so we'll see.
ronjon wrote:KWT wrote:The thing that we can gleam from the ensembles though is there is very good support within the ECM own members of a large threat to the E.Coast somewhere...
Based on the ensemble run, KWT, I think it is entirely plausible for the system to even move west into FL or through the straits. Way out there but the trend appears to be more ridging so we'll see.
Danny MD wrote:Could this be like a hurricane isabel? Should the residents in the mid atlantic area be monitering this?
I mean this in regards to its effects(83 MPH gust in silver spring md, power out for a week+, sustained 45+ mph for hours..) to maryland around the Washington DC area.
Vortex wrote:A trend I've noticed is the Nogaps/CMC/GFS all indicate a wsw/sw movement of future fiona during the next few days..I've noticed this afternoon that the overall motion does appear to be 265-270...
Vortex wrote:A trend I've noticed is the Nogaps/CMC/GFS all indicate a wsw/sw movement of future fiona during the next few days..I've noticed this afternoon that the overall motion does appear to be 265-270...
jlauderdal wrote:PTrackerLA wrote:Wow the path Is strikingly similar to Hugo! Future model runs will certainly be interesting.
it is similar and if this system makes landfall within 200 miles either side of Charleston i will be absolutely shocked, there is just way too much error this far out, its fun to discuss of course but lets see how these models start tending over th enxt 72 hours especially as they get a handle on how far west earl the pearl makes it because at this rate its going to make it to 75W
JPmia wrote:ronjon wrote:KWT wrote:The thing that we can gleam from the ensembles though is there is very good support within the ECM own members of a large threat to the E.Coast somewhere...
Based on the ensemble run, KWT, I think it is entirely plausible for the system to even move west into FL or through the straits. Way out there but the trend appears to be more ridging so we'll see.
Could one of you explain this ensemble? It shows multiple lows in the SW Atlantic. I don't understand that and the other models showing a specific storm.
JPmia wrote:jlauderdal wrote:PTrackerLA wrote:Wow the path Is strikingly similar to Hugo! Future model runs will certainly be interesting.
it is similar and if this system makes landfall within 200 miles either side of Charleston i will be absolutely shocked, there is just way too much error this far out, its fun to discuss of course but lets see how these models start tending over th enxt 72 hours especially as they get a handle on how far west earl the pearl makes it because at this rate its going to make it to 75W
yeah i agree as some have said above..the 'trend' is not looking good for the SE US Coast and/or maybe Florida at the moment especially with that high building in...will be more concerned if I start seeing these types of runs in the medium range of course
KWT wrote:GFS has this at 57W in just 3 days time...looks too quick but then again who knows....
Doesn't look like strengthening at all on the GFS, I think once again the GFS is just a nonsense for Fiona, it just can't get a hold of the actual system at all the whole way through...
Until other models show this solution I'm just going to write this off as the GFS not handling a system at all well...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests