ATL: Ex Tropical Storm EARL - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: Re:

#1261 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:30 pm

chris_fit wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Recon just reported a pressure of 978mb extrapolated.

That's what 8mb down in the last 2-3 hours?


Down 7mb the last 3 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2811
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1262 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:30 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
chris_fit wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Recon just reported a pressure of 978mb extrapolated.

That's what 8mb down in the last 2-3 hours?


Down 7mb the last 3 hours.


Impressive :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145459
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1263 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:31 pm

Crazy,you think 75kts now?
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1264 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:31 pm

Should be a Cat 2 when it reached the Leeward Islands
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1265 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:32 pm

Unless higher estimates come in on the next pass, I would put the intensity at 70-75 kt for the intermediate advisory - with 65 kt SFMR in the SE quad, there would surely be stronger winds in the NW quad.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38094
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1266 Postby Brent » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:33 pm

Not surprised by recon, looks really good on visible.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
AdamFirst
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2491
Age: 36
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL

#1267 Postby AdamFirst » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:33 pm

The Canadian in the central bahamas before it lifts out...

That is a bit of a westward shift. I'll save the crow if the Euro verifies. :wink:
0 likes   
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024

scogor
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 193
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 6:40 pm
Location: Sarasota, Florida

#1268 Postby scogor » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:34 pm

Can anyone post a good link to radar for St. Kitts? Thanks.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1269 Postby MGC » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:34 pm

No westward shift? On Thursday the NHC forecast Earl to be near 17.8 54.0 today....actual 17.2 58.4. A westward error of 4.4 degrees or about 270 nautical miles. 7mb in 3 hours??? RI?....MGC
Last edited by MGC on Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1270 Postby Stephanie » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:34 pm

Sanibel wrote:The early models were wrong with Earl. Antigua and Anguilla should get a strong swipe or even direct hurricane hit. Anegada in the British Virgins is under the gun if the recurve doesn't happen as sharply as predicted.

Look at the hazy look to Earl and better structure. It is telegraphing an intensity increase.


That's the scary thing. Not only would this catch off guard the citizens of those islands, but even the travellers. Nothing suggested a stronger storm than a Cat 1 in earlier models, nevermind a hit.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1271 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:35 pm

I'd at least go up to 70 kt based on the pressure drop and SE quad report, however I would wait to see what comes out of the NW quad to see if a higher intensity is warranted.
0 likes   

User avatar
MortisFL
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 391
Age: 42
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 9:01 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1272 Postby MortisFL » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:35 pm

MGC wrote:No westward shift? On Thursday the NHC forecast Earl to be near 17.8 54.0 today....actual 17.2 58.4. A westward error of 4.4 degrees or about 270 nautical miles.....MGC


That sounds about right. Exactly why you really cant trust a forecast path outside of 48-72 hrs.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re:

#1273 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:35 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:well the 12Z CMC is makes it to the central bahamas before starting to turn...quite a bit farther west then the 00z .. yeah its the cmc.. lol


dont rip the cmc, its been good the last few years so has the euro...if you want to rip something than go after the gfs and all its little buddies like the hwrf and gfdl
0 likes   

emeraldislencguy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: emerald isle nc
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1274 Postby emeraldislencguy » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:36 pm

how would a stronger storm effect the track :flag:
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1275 Postby gatorcane » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:36 pm

MGC wrote:No westward shift? On Thursday the NHC forecast Earl to be near 17.8 54.0 today....actual 17.2 58.4. A westward error of 4.4 degrees or about 270 nautical miles. 7mb in 3 hours??? RI?....MGC


As I mentioned earlier, the latest 11AM advisory they actually shifted the cone track right some when we can clearly see it is moving just a bit north of west.

CMC just ran and it shifts west quite a bit actually with it passing directly over some of the extreme SE bahama islands as a major hurricane. That cone should have been shifted left a tad I thought at least through 72 hours to account for the westward movement.
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:39 pm, edited 3 times in total.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1276 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:37 pm

MortisFL wrote:
MGC wrote:No westward shift? On Thursday the NHC forecast Earl to be near 17.8 54.0 today....actual 17.2 58.4. A westward error of 4.4 degrees or about 270 nautical miles.....MGC


That sounds about right. Exactly why you really cant trust a forecast path outside of 48-72 hrs.


yep, what we do know is if you are in the crosshairs outside 72H you can be very confident you arent taking a direct hit
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: Hurricane EARL - Discussion

#1277 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:39 pm

MGC wrote:No westward shift? On Thursday the NHC forecast Earl to be near 17.8 54.0 today....actual 17.2 58.4. A westward error of 4.4 degrees or about 270 nautical miles. 7mb in 3 hours??? RI?....MGC


300 miles of error is about right by their own admission
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#1278 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:39 pm

Seems the strongest winds were missed this pass, as the highest estimates are about 60 kt in the NW quad (weaker than the left-rear SE quad which supported 65 kt!). I'd go up to 70 kt thinking the strongest winds in the north side were not sampled based on the SE quad observation, plus the pressure drop.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1279 Postby gatorcane » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:42 pm

Folks, check out the forecast for IKE back in 2008. Look how it was supposed to recurve east of Florida and yet the cone had a NW bend to it but the entire cone kept shifting left. Ended up at least 1000 miles west of where it was originally supposed to turn. In this case Hanna's outflow helped to dive Ike WSW, though the ECMWF and GFDL sniffed this out and forecasted Ike to hit Cuba several days prior.

I'm not saying the error will be that bad at all with this one, just saying it has happened:

http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/gr ... p_5W.shtml
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#1280 Postby cyclonic chronic » Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:42 pm

pressure is down. if the winds dont respond to the pressure drop the islands could escape sustained hurricane force winds. but we,ve seen storms with a lower than usual pressure, compared to their winds, have their winds catch up in a hurry. i hope all in the islands have been watching this for the past few days and arent running around like chickens with their heads cut off today. good luck. all of us in the s.w. u.s., even florida, need to watch how far west it goes.
on a positive note it looks on the newest radar frames that its not moving as fast. maybe this is the slow-down before the turn to the n.w.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests