
latest
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Aric Dunn wrote:bob rulz wrote:Its visible appearance is impressive but it still looks disorganized on IR. It could reach cat 2 before landfall in the islands though as it's strengthening at a pretty steady, although not yet rapid, clip.
yeah its still being sheared..
bob rulz wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:bob rulz wrote:Its visible appearance is impressive but it still looks disorganized on IR. It could reach cat 2 before landfall in the islands though as it's strengthening at a pretty steady, although not yet rapid, clip.
yeah its still being sheared..
I think the northerly shear is starting to abate a little bit though...the banding has improved pretty significantly on the north/northwest side today.
jabman98 wrote:gatorcane wrote:Folks, check out the forecast for IKE back in 2008. Look how it was supposed to recurve east of Florida and yet the cone had a NW bend to it but the entire cone kept shifting left. Ended up at least 1000 miles west of where it was originally supposed to turn. In this case Hanna's outflow helped to dive Ike WSW, though the ECMWF and GFDL sniffed this out and forecasted Ike to hit Cuba several days prior.
I'm not saying the error will be that bad at all with this one, just saying it has happened:
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2008/gr ... p_5W.shtml
I remember this well. Went away for about five days where I was out of communication range when Ike was still chugging along through the Atlantic. When I left, Ike was forecast to stay out out to sea, east of Florida. When I got back in communication range, Ike was heading right to Texas and I was coming home to it! Crazy stuff. It wasn't even forecast to head to the Gulf when I left, but by the time I got back it was not only going to the Gulf but heading as far west as Texas.
Hopefully the forecasting has improved since then and the models are more accurate. But Ike wasn't that long ago and it did happen for sure then.
I think the northerly shear is starting to abate a little bit though...the banding has improved pretty significantly on the north/northwest side today.
pavelbure224 wrote:Maybe im still hung over from last night but if Earl gets stronger does that mean the more west it goes?
pavelbure224 wrote:Maybe im still hung over from last night but if Earl gets stronger does that mean the more west it goes?
thetruesms wrote:Sometimes the plus in catching up with a thread is that you get to see the storm's development over several hours without actually having to wait for it to happen in real time. In flipping through the past 10-20 pages (wherever it was I started), the strengthening of the storm is very readily apparent. Which would be really cool if it weren't bearing down on people at the moment
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests