Weatherfreak14 wrote: The Model output really means nothing in forecasting a system with such dynamic synoptic setup. No model can forecast completly accurately in these type of conditions... Not saying much but your best bet is to look where and how the through moves across the US and I see most models are not handling the trough really well. Not saying much about what it might do to Earl, but its more how Earl interacts with the trough and how it curves away.... Being my MET Professor here at OU was talking about this in our discussion today... Earl should continue its WNW to NW track until along the coastline of the OBX. The trough should slowly turn it N and to the NE. I think the current NHC track should be a little more west of its now prediction.
"The Model output really means nothing in forecasting a system with such dynamic synoptic setup." !!!!
So what are you saying, use your eyes and throw the model output out? I've really never heard someone say the model output means nothing, and that if the synoptic situation is "dynamic" the models are useless. Just completely do not get why you would say that. And I surely respect all universities, but none of my teachers would ever say that. They would say the models have a hard time handling this and tell us where their weknesses are, but they would never say they mean nothing.