ATL: KARL - Ex-Hurricane - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#501 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:28 am

perk wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:Houston Galveston AFD...snip...

ECMWF STILL AND NAM NOW DEVELOPING WAVE IN THE EASTERN GULF
ARRIVING ON THE EASTERN SHORE OF THE YUCATAN WEDNESDAY
AFTERNOON/EVENING. GFS STILL A WEAKER SOLUTION ALONG THE SAME
LINES AND TIMING. ECMWF HAS TRENDED A BIT WEAKER AND FARTHER EAST
WITH THE UPPER RIDGING OVER THE NORTHERN GULF WHILE THE GFS HAS
PUSHED THE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE SOUTH FROM MEXICO ACROSS THE GULF.
STAY TUNED.



What exactly are they suggesting?


Looks like a typo - they said "eastern Gulf" but meant Caribbean. There's nothing in the eastern Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#502 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:39 am

perk wrote:
srainhoutx wrote:Houston Galveston AFD...snip...

ECMWF STILL AND NAM NOW DEVELOPING WAVE IN THE EASTERN GULF
ARRIVING ON THE EASTERN SHORE OF THE YUCATAN WEDNESDAY
AFTERNOON/EVENING. GFS STILL A WEAKER SOLUTION ALONG THE SAME
LINES AND TIMING. ECMWF HAS TRENDED A BIT WEAKER AND FARTHER EAST
WITH THE UPPER RIDGING OVER THE NORTHERN GULF WHILE THE GFS HAS
PUSHED THE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE SOUTH FROM MEXICO ACROSS THE GULF.
STAY TUNED.




What exactly are they suggesting?




.....already hints out there coming in....hmmmm....I do remember saying a ridge wont hold for that long in mid-Sept... :wink: ...the ECM been showing this for some time but kept burying it in the BOC....

might have some interesting solutions tonight.....BTW- they are flying a NASA plane in there..that is really interesting as NASA was testing an experimental aircraft over the city yesterday evening..This plane was doing circles after circles...wonder if that is connected.
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#503 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:40 am

Usually when the Atlantic has had a major hurricane on an east coast track you can assume the Caribbean is favorable since it is much deeper into the tropics. However, this year there's a weird condition where maybe the Nina has created dry negative conditions further into the tropics.

It's mid-September and another front is moving off the east coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re:

#504 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:43 am

KWT wrote:Yeah they have alot of research planes flying around in 92L right now anyway so they have a pretty good idea of whats going on with 92L.

Plenty of plusing but still nothing holding long enough, the negative MJO we currently have is no doubt hurting things combined with general low levels of instablity.



negative shegative....if the MJO mattered so much why is IGOR going to be a major?


it obvoiusly the US is EXTREMELY concerned with this system....thus the planes flying in....some one tell me what a NASA HAWK is going in at 58K feet? upper air sampling? sheesh thats high...the one lat night was around 55k....probably the same aircraft..
0 likes   

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#505 Postby Sanibel » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:45 am

Maybe we are all gun-shy now after Gaston and this one is the sleeper? Maybe it just needs to touch the west Caribbean like the traditional pattern.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#506 Postby ROCK » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:46 am

also add that the current heading of the 92L looks to be right over Jam.....really close to last nights TVCN...might run over the YUC higher up towards the channnel....this looks like its heading a little more North than west...
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#507 Postby Pearl River » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:48 am

As always...a waiting game!
Last edited by Pearl River on Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#508 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 9:49 am

Wrong storm...this one is not TD13 right now.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: Re:

#509 Postby Stratosphere747 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:08 am

ROCK wrote:
KWT wrote:Yeah they have alot of research planes flying around in 92L right now anyway so they have a pretty good idea of whats going on with 92L.

Plenty of plusing but still nothing holding long enough, the negative MJO we currently have is no doubt hurting things combined with general low levels of instablity.



negative shegative....if the MJO mattered so much why is IGOR going to be a major?


it obvoiusly the US is EXTREMELY concerned with this system....thus the planes flying in....some one tell me what a NASA HAWK is going in at 58K feet? upper air sampling? sheesh thats high...the one lat night was around 55k....probably the same aircraft..


The GRIP and PREDICT research missions were scheduled and placed in advance for the height of the hurricane season. There should be nothing read into them flying a particular storm as they just happened to coincide.

The Global Hawk (part of the GRIP mission) flies out of California. 20+ hour mission and investigates the storm for around 5 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 36
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: Re:

#510 Postby somethingfunny » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:14 am

ROCK wrote:
KWT wrote:Yeah they have alot of research planes flying around in 92L right now anyway so they have a pretty good idea of whats going on with 92L.

Plenty of plusing but still nothing holding long enough, the negative MJO we currently have is no doubt hurting things combined with general low levels of instablity.



negative shegative....if the MJO mattered so much why is IGOR going to be a major?


it obvoiusly the US is EXTREMELY concerned with this system....thus the planes flying in....some one tell me what a NASA HAWK is going in at 58K feet? upper air sampling? sheesh thats high...the one lat night was around 55k....probably the same aircraft..


If I'm not mistaken it's all part of the National Science Foundation grant that was given to the NHC recently. The holy grail of hurricane forecasting is cyclogenesis and intensity forecasting.... whether 92L ever develops into something more or it doesn't, these flights will give scientists a huge amount of data to analyze and figure out WHY 92L did or did not develop.


It's not that the US is so concerned about 92L's potential in particular, but more concerned that we don't get more Code Red busts like some of the Invests with over 100 pages on Storm2K that never developed! ...Or surprises like Humberto and Hermine which blew up out of minor Code Yellows!
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
perk
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 9:35 am
Location: Richmond Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#511 Postby perk » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:30 am

Rock yesterday i posted my concern on the khou forum that the blocking high may not be in place 7 to 8 days out. Ike taught me a lesson. I've become a skeptic of modeling beyond 72 hours out. Now i'm not advocating that 92L will get far enough north to affect Texas, but i think it,s a little too early to sound the all clear siren.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#512 Postby wxman57 » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:39 am

ROCK wrote:.....already hints out there coming in....hmmmm....I do remember saying a ridge wont hold for that long in mid-Sept... :wink: ...the ECM been showing this for some time but kept burying it in the BOC....

might have some interesting solutions tonight.....BTW- they are flying a NASA plane in there..that is really interesting as NASA was testing an experimental aircraft over the city yesterday evening..This plane was doing circles after circles...wonder if that is connected.


They're not talking about 92L making landfall in Texas, they're talking of the system moving inland into Mexico and then moisture being drawn northward to Texas. I don't see any indications that 92L will make landfall in Texas. Looks like Tampico or southward, still.
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#513 Postby caneman » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:40 am

Rock,

.....already hints out there coming in....hmmmm....I do remember saying a ridge wont hold for that long in mid-Sept... :wink: ...the ECM been showing this for some time but kept burying it in the BOC.... 'End'

Not sure what the heck you are talking about here. How can say the Euro had it burying it in the BOC and then in the same breath say they also said the ridge won't hold? Further, if any model has been right in the short term. It has been CMC, NOGAPS, NAM and HWRF as the system is now NW of where it was few days ago and all showed solutions North or over Jamaica. Time to take the Euro blinders off. :roll:
Last edited by caneman on Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

emeraldislencguy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: emerald isle nc
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#514 Postby emeraldislencguy » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:43 am

how will the weather at south padre be this week
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#515 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:51 am

tailgater wrote:Once it clears DR/Haiti it will likely consolidate, looks to me very near the southern coast to me.

[img]http://weather.msfc.nasa.gov/GOES/GOES14012010255tGxAKl.jpg[/im]


yeah the northerly inflow is being inhibited right now but once it gets slightly farther west it will likely develop. I would watch up towards 17N 75W later tonight and tomorrow. basically follow the larger convective blob at the northern end of the system.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 58
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#516 Postby lrak » Sun Sep 12, 2010 10:55 am

emeraldislencguy wrote:how will the weather at south padre be this week


Hot, no wind, muggy, and partly cloudy. Maybe a quick T shower in the morning along the coast. Lots of Image Bring SUPER OFF!
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5274
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

#517 Postby Nimbus » Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:00 am

Still not organized but it is going to be interesting once it does.
0 likes   

caneman

#518 Postby caneman » Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:08 am

I find it some interesting how some people flame the non-Euro models but when they end up being right you'll never hear it. Thus far, in the short term the non-Euro models have been the most correct. Will it change things downstream who knows but I wouldn't rule out Texas. Clearly this thing has gained Latitude.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#519 Postby Portastorm » Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:17 am

12z guidance per the GFS and NAM are divergent ... NAM much more bullish on development. I'm not laughing off the NAM anymore as it did an excellent job with Hermine. Yes, I know the synoptics and location are different here but I'm just sayin'. :wink:
0 likes   

caneman

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#520 Postby caneman » Sun Sep 12, 2010 11:23 am

Portastorm wrote:12z guidance per the GFS and NAM are divergent ... NAM much more bullish on development. I'm not laughing off the NAM anymore as it did an excellent job with Hermine. Yes, I know the synoptics and location are different here but I'm just sayin'. :wink:


Agreed, the much maligned NAM has done well. Sniffed this one out too.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests