ATL: KARL - Ex-Hurricane - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3466
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#1341 Postby dexterlabio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:00 am

Has this one made landfall already? I am SO impressed, this was like a weakened TS after passing through Yucatan then now a major hurricane!!! What is the expected intensity during landfall? This could be a bad CAT4 cane as it hits land.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1342 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:01 am

Image

Latest
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#1343 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:02 am

000
URNT12 KNHC 171156
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE AL132010
A. 17/11:45:00Z
B. 19 deg 35 min N
095 deg 32 min W
C. 700 mb 2717 m
D. 99 kt
E. 047 deg 6 nm
F. 135 deg 87 kt
G. 047 deg 6 nm
H. 957 mb
I. 12 C / 3027 m
J. 17 C / 3045 m
K. 13 C / NA
L. OPEN SE
M. C8
N. 12345 / 7
O. 0.02 / 3 nm
P. AF301 0513A KARL OB 04
MAX OUTBOUND AND MAX FL WIND 92 KT SW QUAD 11:48:20Z
;
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1344 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:03 am

I think given the surface estimates still upoort 100-105kts it probably won't be a 4 before landfall but its still a very powerful hurricane not to be messed with at all...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Hurricanewatcher2007
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 578
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:10 pm

Re:

#1345 Postby Hurricanewatcher2007 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:04 am

KWT wrote:I think given the surface estimates still upoort 100-105kts it probably won't be a 4 before landfall but its still a very powerful hurricane not to be messed with at all...


Theres still the northwest quad to go through!
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

#1346 Postby AussieMark » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:05 am

looks like it looks better on satellite than the reality.
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#1347 Postby cyclonic chronic » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:06 am

:uarrow:

i agree, no matter what they find its still a bad day for those in veracruz. recon also could've missed the strongest fl winds. its a small core and finding the strongest winds might be hard to do.
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1348 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:06 am

I hope they can make a few more passes before this beast moves too close to land. Looks like it very well might strengthen all the way up to (and possibly through just the very beginning of) landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#1349 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:10 am

Hurricanewatcher2007 wrote:
KWT wrote:I think given the surface estimates still upoort 100-105kts it probably won't be a 4 before landfall but its still a very powerful hurricane not to be messed with at all...


Theres still the northwest quad to go through!


Yeah thats true but its not going to be much if any stronger then the NE quadrant, last recon flight the NE quadrant was the strongest part of the system and I suspect thats the same...

The NHC will likely discount those FL readings and go with the SMFR which shows 99kts, or 100kts more or less...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1350 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:13 am

Worth noting veracruz will very likely have to deal with the southern eyewall and may even get the full force of the W.Eyewall and get the eye feature as well...either way its going to be close.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1351 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:16 am

found a couple of stations run by the U.S. EPA and the Mexican Government in Veracurz Harbor, Mexico...and Sacrifice Island, Mexico...they are both about to get run flat over by this beast, and I hope they are both as sturdy as NOAA Buoy 41044 was!

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=VERV4

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=SACV4
0 likes   

cyclonic chronic

#1352 Postby cyclonic chronic » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:16 am

is anyone else having problems getting to the radar web site? maybe too much traffic
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1792
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#1353 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:18 am

I think Karl peaked before recon got to him. The cloud tops have warmed, the eye has become more cloud filled. He's still likely a Category 3, but I think he was approaching Category 4 status just a few hours ago.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

Re:

#1354 Postby AussieMark » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:20 am

KWT wrote:Worth noting veracruz will very likely have to deal with the southern eyewall and may even get the full force of the W.Eyewall and get the eye feature as well...either way its going to be close.


yeah this will be bad for Veracruz

hurricanes have come within 60 miles of Veracruz in the following years: 1892, 1931, 1950, 1955 and 2005 so its not effected very often I hope they are prepared.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1355 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:22 am

Yeah AM but this hurricane is probably the strongest of the lot of them, will probably have a major hurricane make landfall very near a major city, I just hoped they've had enough time to prepare because many probably weren't expecting a 100-110kts hurricane on top of them when they went to sleep last night...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3466
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: ATL: KARL - Hurricane - Discussion

#1356 Postby dexterlabio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:23 am

wait then what do those 6.0-6.5 t-numbers posted here mean? are those preliminary estimates or totally unofficial? I though this was around 115-120kts based on what I've seen here, but it seems that it is a CAT3. Well, this doesn't need to be a CAT4 to impress us, being close to land and intensifying at a rapid pace I can say this is very impressive.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1357 Postby KWT » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:25 am

The thing to remember is this is the strongest ever hurricane for this part of the BoC so its going to be a brutal hurricane regardless of whether its a 4 or a 3 in the end.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
alan1961
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 771
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:58 am
Location: Derby, Derbyshire, England
Contact:

Re:

#1358 Postby alan1961 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:25 am

cyclonic chronic wrote:is anyone else having problems getting to the radar web site? maybe too much traffic


Yes its not working for me either cyclonic..it dont take
much to knock mexican radar out.
0 likes   

User avatar
AussieMark
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5858
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 6:36 pm
Location: near Sydney, Australia

Re:

#1359 Postby AussieMark » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:31 am

KWT wrote:The thing to remember is this is the strongest ever hurricane for this part of the BoC so its going to be a brutal hurricane regardless of whether its a 4 or a 3 in the end.


Janet in 1955 was the previous strongest for the area

Image

This looks to be stronger than that
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#1360 Postby brunota2003 » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:33 am

On a side note, it was inside Hurricane Janet that we lost the only Recon aircraft in the Atlantic Basin, Snowcloud Five.

http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/hunter4.asp
Last edited by brunota2003 on Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Stormybajan and 44 guests