ATL: MATTHEW - Ex-Tropical Storm - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
dwsqos2

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#281 Postby dwsqos2 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:03 pm

Hmm...12Z guidance tends to support my dud call. New call: I doubt that 95L ever becomes stronger than 50 knots.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re:

#282 Postby ColinDelia » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:08 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
closer look to the vorticity


Big change the past 24 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#283 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:26 pm

Sab Dvorak T numbers.

22/1745 UTC 13.4N 70.5W TOO WEAK 95L -- Atlantic

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html

Best Track has it at 12.6N-71.3W while SAB is at 13.4N-70.5W. Which one is right?
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
FLpanhandle91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1033
Age: 34
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Fort Walton Beach, FL

#284 Postby FLpanhandle91 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:27 pm

Has anyone else noticed a little more spinning with the convection in recent frames?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#285 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:29 pm

Loop - http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_1

tomorrow should be interesting
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#286 Postby SouthFloridawx » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:33 pm

A lot more convection this afternoon. Could dry air from the Continent be inhibiting development?

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re:

#287 Postby SoupBone » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:33 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Loop - http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... _floater_1

tomorrow should be interesting


Do you see the cloud structures racing toward the NW in front of 95L?
0 likes   

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#288 Postby otowntiger » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:38 pm

dwsqos2 wrote:Hmm...12Z guidance tends to support my dud call. New call: I doubt that 95L ever becomes stronger than 50 knots.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Yes, the models (or several of them anyway) seem to be less and less enthused with each successive run.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#289 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:42 pm

dwsqos2 wrote:Hmm...12Z guidance tends to support my dud call. New call: I doubt that 95L ever becomes stronger than 50 knots.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


I don't believe this is at all what is going here. The models actually show an environment that is conducive to alot of strengthening, as well as SST's and TCHP that support a monstrous hurricane effect. The reason the models are keeping it weak is due to complicated interaction with landmass. Whether or not this hold true remains to be seen, but you cannot really say the models are supporting your claim when in actuality if the storm moves slightly north or gets stronger faster, the situation is going to be completely different.


This is a very complicated solution and it's still very far out. I expect the intensity of the model guidance to fluctuate wildly, especially if this manages to avoid landmass.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10145
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#290 Postby Blown Away » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:46 pm

cycloneye wrote:Sab Dvorak T numbers.
22/1745 UTC 13.4N 70.5W TOO WEAK 95L -- Atlantic
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html

Best Track has it at 12.6N-71.3W while SAB is at 13.4N-70.5W. Which one is right?


A little bump to the north with the positioning?? IMO, the reason some models are showing a weak system is because 95L is over land to long. I think few hundred miles will make the difference between a hurricane and a weak low as it spins in the Gulf of Honduras area.
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#291 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:51 pm

If the steering currents remain as is or close to it, it would not make landfall in Houndoras and would probably be the worst case, but the currents will probably change between now and then

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic2/real ... c/dlm1.GIF

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products. Follow us on
Twitter
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#292 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:57 pm

Blown Away wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Sab Dvorak T numbers.
22/1745 UTC 13.4N 70.5W TOO WEAK 95L -- Atlantic
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/tdpositions.html

Best Track has it at 12.6N-71.3W while SAB is at 13.4N-70.5W. Which one is right?


A little bump to the north with the positioning?? IMO, the reason some models are showing a weak system is because 95L is over land to long. I think few hundred miles will make the difference between a hurricane and a weak low as it spins in the Gulf of Honduras area.


Regardless of what is the position, if it continues to race westward (20kts at 18z) and not gain suficient latitude, it will be at land faster not allowing for strong development.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#293 Postby Sanibel » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:21 pm

That Atlantic feature seen in the dry air wedged on top of 95L has snuck in behind it and pinched down on its back. It should scoot away from under it and get better convected further west.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#294 Postby x-y-no » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:35 pm

Blown Away wrote: IMO, the reason some models are showing a weak system is because 95L is over land to long. I think few hundred miles will make the difference between a hurricane and a weak low as it spins in the Gulf of Honduras area.


Maybe, but I'd note that the HWRF keeps it out over water, yet still only has a TS at the end of the run (126 hours)
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145303
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#295 Postby cycloneye » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:49 pm

The latest.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#296 Postby CourierPR » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:52 pm

The convection south of the Dominican Republic appears to have become more concentrated in the past few hours.
0 likes   

cwachal

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#297 Postby cwachal » Wed Sep 22, 2010 3:53 pm

cycloneye wrote:The latest.

Image



I think I can finally see a LLC ... now convection needs to build around it and we will have a TD
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#298 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:08 pm

Image

72 hours ... intensifying over land? LOL
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#299 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:13 pm

It's looks as though 95L will not be an issue for folks west of 90 and probably even further eastward. GREAT NEWS. IMO


NWS Afternoon Discussion New Orleans, LA

.LONG TERM...
THE MAIN CONCERN IS WITH A TROPICAL CYCLONE THAT IS LIKELY TO
FORM IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL TO WESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA OVER THE NEXT
COUPLE DAYS. THE LONGER TERM PATTERN AND THE ECMWF MODEL FAVOR A
LOW MOVING SLOWLY NORTH ACROSS THE WESTERN CARIBBEAN SEA REACHING
NEAR WESTERN CUBA NEXT WEDNESDAY.

THE CENTRAL GULF COAST REGION SHOULD REMAIN PROTECTED FROM ANY
TROPICAL SYSTEM DUE TO A DEVELOPING UPPER TROUGH THAT IS EXPECTED
TO SET UP OVER THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI VALLEY AND TENNESSEE VALLEY
REGION LATE IN THE WEEKEND INTO THE MIDDLE OF NEXT WEEK. A FAIRLY
STRONG COLD FRONT IS EXPECTED TO MOVE THROUGH THE FORECAST AREA
SUNDAY NIGHT AND MONDAY. IN ADVANCE OF THE FRONT...THE CHANCE OF
SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS WILL INCREASE OVER THE WEEKEND WITH THE
BEST CHANCE ON SUNDAY.

DRIER/LESS HUMID AND SLIGHTLY COOLER AIR...ESPECIALLY AT
NIGHT...IS EXPECTED MONDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY IN THE WAKE OF THE
COLD FRONT. HAVE DISCOUNTED THE 12Z GFS MODEL RUN TODAY WHICH IS A
SUBSTANTIAL SOUTHWEST OUTLIER WITH THE UPPER LOW/TROUGH AND TOO
SLOW PUSHING THE COLD FRONT OFFSHORE. 22/TD
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#300 Postby Vortex » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:21 pm

As we progress through the evening/overnight hours the convection should increase in coverage and intensity…The LLC will become better defined as SA has less of an impact on inflow from the south. 95 will begin to draw in deep tropical moisture from the SW Caribbean and Pacific.. We should see a marked increase in overall organization within the next 12-24 hours…
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests