2010 retired hurricanes

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Ad Novoxium
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 348
Age: 35
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#101 Postby Ad Novoxium » Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:12 pm

Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.
0 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#102 Postby HurricaneRyan » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:19 pm

Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

Metalicwx220

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#103 Postby Metalicwx220 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:41 pm

HurricaneRyan wrote:
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?

LOL if It doesnt get retired it will be the costliest non retired hurricne. Ya think so?
0 likes   

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#104 Postby HurricaneRyan » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:47 pm

Metalicwx220 wrote:
HurricaneRyan wrote:
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?

LOL if It doesnt get retired it will be the costliest non retired hurricne. Ya think so?


Yeah.

But Mexico always smokes crack because they didn't retire Emily.
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#105 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:50 pm

Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.
0 likes   

Metalicwx220

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#106 Postby Metalicwx220 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:55 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.

UUUUMM................Escuminac? explanation please lol
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#107 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:01 pm

Metalicwx220 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


That's correct - Escuminac killed 35 in Canada.

UUUUMM................Escuminac? explanation please lol


That was a nickname for an unnamed 1959 hurricane there. Escuminac was the town hardest hit.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Jed
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 545
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Cen Tex

#108 Postby Hurricane Jed » Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:25 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricane Jed
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 545
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 3:36 pm
Location: Cen Tex

#109 Postby Hurricane Jed » Mon Feb 07, 2011 8:49 pm

Personally I find it hard to swallow that Igor and Earl make this the worst season in Canada since 1959. Did they completely forget about Hurricane Juan in 2003?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re:

#110 Postby Hurricanehink » Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:23 pm

Hurricane Jed wrote:Personally I find it hard to swallow that Igor and Earl make this the worst season in Canada since 1959. Did they completely forget about Hurricane Juan in 2003?


Yea, but Igor caused almost as much monetary damage as Juan did, and 2003 didn't have any other hurricane landfalls. In fact, 2010 was the last year since 1969 (as far as I could find) in which two hurricanes hit Canada (which was barely true then, as Gerda hit Maine, and Debbie did the same thing as Igor by passing just SE of Newfoundland).
0 likes   

Ad Novoxium
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 348
Age: 35
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 2:12 am

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#111 Postby Ad Novoxium » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:32 am

HurricaneRyan wrote:
Ad Novoxium wrote:Since the 1959 season...Escuminac?

Also, I think Karl's chances may have taken a hit of some sort because of the damage report.


What the Hell did Mexico say to blow this storm's chance of retirement?

It's actually the discrepancy between the estimates from the Mexican government and the final report. It's not actually the first time such a discrepancy existed between a storm's reports and the final report for the storm: 1998's Tropical Storm Javier in the East Pacific was initially reported to have had a high death toll and damage total (it was similar to Agatha from this year, but the death toll was slightly lower, yet some reports from the time said it was possible Javier had a 1000+ death toll) but the overall report didn't mention this. Javier wasn't retired after the season.

And technically, high damage doesn't automatically retire a storm: Juan in 85 was a billion-dollar storm and it somehow evaded retirement (it hit Louisiana and did a similar direct death toll to Karl).
Last edited by Ad Novoxium on Tue Feb 08, 2011 5:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

WeatherGuesser
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2672
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 6:46 am

#112 Postby WeatherGuesser » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:08 am

When will they say?

If none are retired, will they say that? Or will there just be no statement?
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#113 Postby Macrocane » Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:10 am

The countries of the RA IV Hurricane Committee will have a meeting in the 2nd week of March, in that meeting they retire and replace the names so we will know wich ones were retired after that meeting.
0 likes   

Migle
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 203
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 5:30 pm
Location: New Orleans

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#114 Postby Migle » Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:12 am

WeatherGuesser wrote:When will they say?

If none are retired, will they say that? Or will there just be no statement?


Whenever the WMO or whatever it's called gets together and decides. I think it's sometime in March or April.
0 likes   

Cyclone1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2739
Age: 33
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Florida

#115 Postby Cyclone1 » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:50 pm

If Karl isn't retired, I'd be kinda baffled. Maybe they just can't think of another male K name.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#116 Postby somethingfunny » Fri Feb 11, 2011 7:05 pm

I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left. :lol:
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2040
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#117 Postby Hurricanehink » Fri Feb 11, 2011 9:03 pm

somethingfunny wrote:I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left. :lol:


It's a lot for Newfoundland. There are only 450,000 people on the island. Proportionally, that would be $8.3 billion in Florida.
0 likes   

User avatar
somethingfunny
ChatStaff
ChatStaff
Posts: 3926
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
Location: McKinney, Texas

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#118 Postby somethingfunny » Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:15 pm

Hurricanehink wrote:
somethingfunny wrote:I would pay a lot of money to get Kruschev on the 2016 list. They can't retire Igor though as $200M isn't a whole lot of money even by Canadian standards and also, there are literally no "I" names left. :lol:


It's a lot for Newfoundland. There are only 450,000 people on the island. Proportionally, that would be $8.3 billion in Florida.


Wow, I hadn't thought of it that way. Okay, goodbye Igor....make room for Ichabod!
0 likes   
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.

HurricaneRyan
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 813
Age: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 3:05 pm

Re: 2010 retired hurricanes

#119 Postby HurricaneRyan » Sat Feb 12, 2011 4:38 pm

Ian needs to be next in line. it sounds NOTHING like Ivan so the people saying that are practically smoking crack.

There ARE K names left.

-Kurt
-Kellan
-Korey
-Konrad
-Krishan
-Kory
-Kullen
0 likes   
Kay '22 Hilary '23

Metalicwx220

#120 Postby Metalicwx220 » Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:14 pm

It depends on how you pronounce ian. They think its eye-AN when its e-IN or IN. it spelt like ivan just without the v.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blown Away, Google Adsense [Bot] and 35 guests