SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- beagleagle23
- Tropical Low
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 3:12 pm
- Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Re: SSHWS modification????
this, in my opinion, is simply a waste of the time and money it would take to change categories by simply 1 mile per hour difference on the top end.
The only advantage I could see is if a top end 3 was a 4, more poeple might take better notice. But still, by 1 mile an hour difference, I don't really think it would.
0 likes
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
I honestly dont care that much. Their the experts, if they see it fit that alright by me. If they dont, then fine by me.
0 likes
- vbhoutex
- Storm2k Executive
- Posts: 29113
- Age: 73
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
- Location: Cypress, TX
- Contact:
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
I think their reasoning is sound, but whether it really needs to be done I am not so sure.
0 likes
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
On a side nore, notice that the width of cat. 4 increases to 28 mph from 26 mph. Compare that to only 15 mph for cat. 2. Is that ok or should the categories have more uniform sizes? Opinions?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
Re: Re:
southerngale wrote:RL3AO wrote:Makes sense to me. Not sure why they are asking. Just do it.
Ditto.
Thirded. It makes perfect sense, and would alleviate some confusion for forecasters. The average member of the public wouldn't even notice or care.
0 likes
Through all the windows I only see infinity.
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
I sent them this:
No, you are thinking about it wrong. The NHC estimates wind speed in 5 knot increments. Previously, the Cat 4 interval was 114-135 knots. Storms with estimated wind speeds of 115, 120, 125, 130, and 135 knots were designated Category 4. Going forward with a Cat 4 window of 113-136 knots does not affect which storms are included.
The only difference is that when they convert from knots to mph and then round to the nearest 5 mph, the mph rating still falls into the right category.
I spent an embarrassingly long time working on the Wikipedia Tropical Cyclone portal. We were bothered by this same problem and, the internet being what it is, many tempers exploded over it. Although your adjustment of the scale would erase just one minor element of confusion, I can attest that there are many of us who would greatly appreciate the clarity.
LarryWx wrote:On a side nore, notice that the width of cat. 4 increases to 28 mph from 26 mph. Compare that to only 15 mph for cat. 2. Is that ok or should the categories have more uniform sizes? Opinions?
No, you are thinking about it wrong. The NHC estimates wind speed in 5 knot increments. Previously, the Cat 4 interval was 114-135 knots. Storms with estimated wind speeds of 115, 120, 125, 130, and 135 knots were designated Category 4. Going forward with a Cat 4 window of 113-136 knots does not affect which storms are included.
The only difference is that when they convert from knots to mph and then round to the nearest 5 mph, the mph rating still falls into the right category.
0 likes
- P.K.
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 5149
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
- Location: Watford, England
- Contact:
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
As others have said I'm not sure how this really makes any difference especially as the base units are kts.
I've said it before but personally I'd reduce the scale to three 64kt+ categories in line with the other RSMCs (Inlcuding the JMA if you look at the Japanese advisories) but I can't ever see that happening.
I've said it before but personally I'd reduce the scale to three 64kt+ categories in line with the other RSMCs (Inlcuding the JMA if you look at the Japanese advisories) but I can't ever see that happening.
0 likes
Re: SSHWS modification???? NHC wants comments.
plasticup wrote:LarryWx wrote:On a side nore, notice that the width of cat. 4 increases to 28 mph from 26 mph. Compare that to only 15 mph for cat. 2. Is that ok or should the categories have more uniform sizes? Opinions?
No, you are thinking about it wrong. The NHC estimates wind speed in 5 knot increments. Previously, the Cat 4 interval was 114-135 knots. Storms with estimated wind speeds of 115, 120, 125, 130, and 135 knots were designated Category 4. Going forward with a Cat 4 window of 113-136 knots does not affect which storms are included.
The only difference is that when they convert from knots to mph and then round to the nearest 5 mph, the mph rating still falls into the right category.
I follow you. However, I'm still wondering about there being five different storm strengths for cat. 4 vs. only three for each of cat. 1-3 even before this mod. Should cat. 4 be wider than the 1-3 cat.'s?
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests