ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#841 Postby KWT » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:24 pm

bamajammer4eva wrote:
JB's Thoughts

BigJoeBastardiJoe Bastardi
Puerto Rico Threatened Tuesday by Emily to Be.. Bahamas after that. anxious moments next weekend for US possible


Sounds like a fairly reasonable call from JB, I think its quite clear now this is a major threat to the NE Caribbean west through to Hispaniola and its developing in a region that has produced some real beasts in the past.

I think odds are pretty good that it'll be a major at some point...looks like a classic WPAC system!
Last edited by KWT on Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
msbee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3027
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 10:11 am
Location: St. Maarten

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#842 Postby msbee » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:25 pm

Gusty
do they have an English version?
0 likes   
Too many hurricanes to remember

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: Re:

#843 Postby otowntiger » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:25 pm

SeminoleWind wrote:
SFLcane wrote:
Evil Jeremy wrote:BAMs really receded on their 18z run, with none of them showing clear recurve unlike the previous run.


?

Image


The tvcn takes a sharp ene turn at the end of that run?



It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

#844 Postby TwisterFanatic » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:26 pm

Looks really, really close in that time lapse.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

Re: Re:

#845 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:26 pm

theweatherwatch wrote:
HurricaneWarning92 wrote:wow 2005 had 7 named storms by the start of August... 6 would be very close...


Unless the "F" named storm forms from that wave coming off Africa and they upgrade it today or tomorrow we will only have 5 named storms by August 1st. Which is still only 2 storms away from 2005. At this rate we are on track to use all the names on the list this year if this continues!


yes, thats what i meant. Emily would be 5 since it is expected to become the 5th storm of the season before July ends. Its just someone mention a possible Franklin very soon as well come August. but thank you. 8-)
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#846 Postby Gustywind » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:27 pm

msbee wrote:Gusty
do they have an English version?

No unhopefully Msbee, you should have to translate from french to english. Thus they have a protection of their weather forecast in PDF version.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#847 Postby Nimbus » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:28 pm

The models probably will change over time as they usually do. Most of the official initialization points that have been posted recently look a little too far east. Guess we wait till the elongation issue is settled and we have a clear center. Like they said it should be somewhere between 12.8 N and 13 N when it passes 50 W.
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#848 Postby Gustywind » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:28 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: Re:

#849 Postby KWT » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:30 pm

otowntiger wrote:It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.


Yeah the models sure look that way, ewsp if you look at the predicited upper pattern, gonna need a big change for this system to be a threat to the US other then maybe the outer Banks. The Bahamas on the otherhand do need to keep a real close eye, because thats a big too close to call...

Obviously its also fair to say things can change, rapidly.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#850 Postby bella_may » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:31 pm

I just dont see how some of you guys are ruling this thing out of coming in the GOM.it still looks like a real possibility and the models are shifting south
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#851 Postby KWT » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:32 pm

TwisterFanatic wrote:Looks really, really close in that time lapse.


Yep, i wonder whether the presence of the other circulation (which is weaker then yesterday but still rather obvious) is part of the reason why the NHC are just holding back from upgrading.

Barring a really unexpected poofage, this one will be upgraded in the next 24hrs.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

Re: Re:

#852 Postby shaggy » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:32 pm

KWT wrote:
otowntiger wrote:It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.


Yeah the models sure look that way, ewsp if you look at the predicited upper pattern, gonna need a big change for this system to be a threat to the US other then maybe the outer Banks. The Bahamas on the otherhand do need to keep a real close eye, because thats a big too close to call...

Obviously its also fair to say things can change, rapidly.



I was noticing on the 12z runs of the cmc and gfs that there seemed to be a ridge building in north of the system in the last couple of frames of both those models. Its A LONG ways out and everything is going to change over the course of the next 8-10 days but it did catch my eye earlier.
0 likes   

DonWrk
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 488
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:54 pm
Location: Collinsville, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#853 Postby DonWrk » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:32 pm

0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re:

#854 Postby ozonepete » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:33 pm

Gustywind wrote:Image


Pretty large system. Too close for comfort.
0 likes   

Florida1118

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#855 Postby Florida1118 » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:33 pm

bella_may wrote:I just dont see how some of you guys are ruling this thing out of coming in the GOM.it still looks like a real possibility and the models are shifting south

Because, even if they are shifting south, they all bring it to the Bahamas and Eastward. None point at the gulf YET. If we see that, some of us might change our thought. Thats the thing with the tropics. It changes.
0 likes   

theweatherwatch

Re: Re:

#856 Postby theweatherwatch » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:36 pm

otowntiger wrote:It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.


However MOST of the models there never finish the recurve in the time that they run up to. 91L/Emily could be a threat to the US East Coast if the recurve isn't finished.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#857 Postby ozonepete » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:37 pm

Florida1118 wrote:
bella_may wrote:I just dont see how some of you guys are ruling this thing out of coming in the GOM.it still looks like a real possibility and the models are shifting south

Because, even if they are shifting south, they all bring it to the Bahamas and Eastward. None point at the gulf YET. If we see that, some of us might change our thought. Thats the thing with the tropics. It changes.


Loooong way to go for that. We can speculate, but there is no technology at this point in time that can predict that far out.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#858 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:40 pm

shaggy wrote:
KWT wrote:
otowntiger wrote:It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.


Yeah the models sure look that way, ewsp if you look at the predicited upper pattern, gonna need a big change for this system to be a threat to the US other then maybe the outer Banks. The Bahamas on the otherhand do need to keep a real close eye, because thats a big too close to call...

Obviously its also fair to say things can change, rapidly.



I was noticing on the 12z runs of the cmc and gfs that there seemed to be a ridge building in north of the system in the last couple of frames of both those models. Its A LONG ways out and everything is going to change over the course of the next 8-10 days but it did catch my eye earlier.



cant figure out why everyone seems to be overlooking one of the most reliable models this time... The euro calls for a east coast threat along with the nogaps and GFDL... the gfs stalls the system which clearly means that ridging build back in and steering is weak. the cmc also does.. point being this progressive pattern does not bode well for a recurve before at least the bahamas... especially for a large system and with the large size we are looking at even more uncertainty.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

shaggy
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: greenville, n.c.

Re: Re:

#859 Postby shaggy » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:41 pm

theweatherwatch wrote:
otowntiger wrote:It appears that according to that spaghetti model graphic that this system may not be a fish (because it could hit the islands) but it certainly appears to be a recurver . Does not look to be a threat to the Continental U.S., at least according to the models that is, imho.


However MOST of the models there never finish the recurve in the time that they run up to. 91L/Emily could be a threat to the US East Coast if the recurve isn't finished.



Thats why I was asking about the animated runs of the cmc and gfs. Both show some sort of ridge building back in to the north of the system. If the trough doesn't get it to do a full recurve then the EC needs to watch it carefully. So many days away plenty of time to watch it for us.....the islands on the other hand need to be going over hurricane preperations now.
0 likes   

User avatar
FireRat
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1246
Age: 38
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:38 pm
Location: North Carolina

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#860 Postby FireRat » Sat Jul 30, 2011 4:45 pm

It's looking better as the day goes by, I agree with Wxman, they should immediately issue a warning on this developing monster. I've been warning about August 1st-4th and Aug. 7-10 as perhaps having hurricane type events at another forum I belong. I wonder if this storm would encompass both time frames? Looks like it will be a big player, much more promising than Don that's for sure. I'd say it's already looking like a TD.
0 likes   
Georges '98, Irene '99, Frances '04, Jeanne '04, Katrina '05, Wilma '05, Gustav '08, Isaac '12, Matthew '16, Florence '18, Michael '18, Ian '22


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests