ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1381 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:00 am

Although this is not a comparison at all to 91L. we have to remember that SW motions do happen when ridges build back in.... :cheesy: :eek: :eek:

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Weatherfreak000

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1382 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:04 am

wxman57 wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:What makes you so sure this is a recurve? I really don't see a large sweeping trough to pick this thing up. All I see is a very weak shortwave trough that *may* allow for the cyclone to sit and stall for a while before before bending back west as the ridge builds back in. Thanks :)


Projected steering currents across the Caribbean and Gulf next week would suggest it either recurves or begins moving south of west and hits Nicaragua. Massive ridge over the south-central U.S. extending across the Gulf to the NW Caribbean and across the SE U.S. for all of next week.



This has been what the NHC, models, and pro mets have been getting at. It's a shame as members such as myself have to defend ourselves for stating our opinion on it when some people have trouble letting a storm go. (Same situation every damn season, members have trouble seeing a storm go I get it)


Been there done that. Trust me. I have had to move out of NOLA to North Louisiana for schooling...so I am missing all the potential action. Since then I have been able to have a more open-minded approach to storms whereas otherwise i'd probably be sitting in the boat hoping 91L dodges the MASSIVE weakness and avoids the DEATH ridge. :lol:
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1383 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:06 am

Aric Dunn wrote:Although this is not a comparison at all to 91L. we have to remember that SW motions do happen when ridges build back in.... :cheesy: :eek: :eek:

Image


yep Ike had a similar track to Andrew at first and then it just went SW into the GOM.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1384 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:07 am

Understood...however, I don't feel very confident about this recurve scenario because:

1) Its August and large longwave troughs that sweep systems out to sea are hard to come by

2) The fact that there will be a ridge over the entire US next week suggests that maybe this thing begins to feel a weakness from the exiting s/w trough over the NE US and then turns back west under the ridge that will be reforming over the NE US after the trough slides by which would imply a threat to FL and the Gulf next week



wxman57 wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:What makes you so sure this is a recurve? I really don't see a large sweeping trough to pick this thing up. All I see is a very weak shortwave trough that *may* allow for the cyclone to sit and stall for a while before before bending back west as the ridge builds back in. Thanks :)


Projected steering currents across the Caribbean and Gulf next week would suggest it either recurves or begins moving south of west and hits Nicaragua. Massive ridge over the south-central U.S. extending across the Gulf to the NW Caribbean and across the SE U.S. for all of next week.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

#1385 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:07 am

^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.

Edit: CaneFreak have you BEEN here for the past few years?? :lol:


Storms come and go that challenge what "Should" happen at any point in a season. Ike being a strong example but inverse. Remember, Climatology is NOT a forecast.
0 likes   

fox13weather
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm

Re:

#1386 Postby fox13weather » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:11 am

Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.


Be careful???? Recurve is the favored solution by far??? You are telling people to be careful discussing the situation and then make a comment that is not supported by science. How can you make such a statement when the GFDL and the HWRF have shifted significantly to the west??
0 likes   

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1387 Postby bella_may » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:13 am

Agreed. Folks in fl really need to be watching this
ote="'CaneFreak"]Understood...however, I don't feel very confident about this recurve scenario because:

1) Its August and large longwave troughs that sweep systems out to sea are hard to come by

2) The fact that there will be a ridge over the entire US next week suggests that maybe this thing begins to feel a weakness from the exiting s/w trough over the NE US and then turns back west under the ridge that will be reforming over the NE US after the trough slides by which would imply a threat to FL and the Gulf next week



wxman57 wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:What makes you so sure this is a recurve? I really don't see a large sweeping trough to pick this thing up. All I see is a very weak shortwave trough that *may* allow for the cyclone to sit and stall for a while before before bending back west as the ridge builds back in. Thanks :)


Projected steering currents across the Caribbean and Gulf next week would suggest it either recurves or begins moving south of west and hits Nicaragua. Massive ridge over the south-central U.S. extending across the Gulf to the NW Caribbean and across the SE U.S. for all of next week.
[/quote]
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1388 Postby jinftl » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:13 am

Great discussion and interesting to see how the 'recurve' view has now been replaced by a 'ridge of death' and the first (all be it, quite for now) speculation that this will inevitable make it into the Gulf. The one thing that has to happen first - this needs to develop a LLC and until recon confirms that, the model runs are speculation at best.

Haven't seen a model run that goes west of 80W...anything suggesting that is beyond 168 hours....and anything beyond a week out has a margin of error from Long Island to Belize!

91L/TD/Emily will do what she will....and the models will flip flop all over the place until there is an LLC to initialize them from.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1389 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:13 am

Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.


But saying that recurve is favored "by far" can make people stop paying attention when they should still be watching. Especially the "by far" part.

EDIT: I don't think I've ever seen a storm stir up this much debate here before.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: Re:

#1390 Postby bella_may » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:15 am

fox13weather wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.


Be careful???? Recurve is the favored solution by far??? You are telling people to be careful discussing the situation and then make a comment that is not supported by science. How can you make such a statement when the GFDL and the HWRF have shifted significantly to the west??

Thank you
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

#1391 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:15 am

I believe hes just making an opinion to why he doesnt feel confident. Besides, if its for sure going to recurve then that must mean it gets stronger sooner than expected. or else it just goes towards the yucatan as a weak system, so at the end it didnt recurve either.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

bella_may
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 908
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 2:13 pm
Location: SE Mississippi coast

Re: Re:

#1392 Postby bella_may » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:16 am

fox13weather wrote:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.


Be careful???? Recurve is the favored solution by far??? You are telling people to be careful discussing the situation and then make a comment that is not supported by science. How can you make such a statement when the GFDL and the HWRF have shifted significantly to the west??

Thank you
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#1393 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:16 am

I don't care how UNFAVORED of a track it is...the possibility is still very real that this gets trapped and heads back west...just sit back, relax, and watch it unfold... :P

Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.

Edit: CaneFreak have you BEEN here for the past few years?? :lol:


Storms come and go that challenge what "Should" happen at any point in a season. Ike being a strong example but inverse. Remember, Climatology is NOT a forecast.
0 likes   

Weatherfreak000

Re: Re:

#1394 Postby Weatherfreak000 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:22 am

'CaneFreak wrote:I don't care how UNFAVORED of a track it is...the possibility is still very real that this gets trapped and heads back west...just sit back, relax, and watch it unfold... :P

Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.

Edit: CaneFreak have you BEEN here for the past few years?? :lol:


Storms come and go that challenge what "Should" happen at any point in a season. Ike being a strong example but inverse. Remember, Climatology is NOT a forecast.


That's FINE bro don't forget this whole thing got started cuz you CHALLENGE people, you insulted Gatorcane flat out, then you challenged me. It's like bro....your going to SERIOUSLY challenge people cuz u have a hunch? That's flat out unbecoming.

SO what i'm going to do, and plan on doing, is constantly harping on the recurve solution as I see fit.
0 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re:

#1395 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:23 am

HurricaneWarning92 wrote:I believe hes just making an opinion to why he doesnt feel confident. Besides, if its for sure going to recurve then that must mean it gets stronger sooner than expected. or else it just goes towards the yucatan as a weak system, so at the end it didnt recurve either.


There are always more than two options. It's never "this or that". These are the tropics. Anything can happen.
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#1396 Postby RL3AO » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:23 am

406
URNT15 KNHC 311521
AF304 01EEA INVEST HDOB 01 20110731
151000 1742N 06448W 0147 ///// 0142 +287 +234 360000 000 /// /// 23
151030 1742N 06448W 0149 ///// 0145 +290 +232 360000 000 /// /// 23
151100 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +290 +230 360000 000 /// /// 23
151130 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0147 +292 +227 360000 000 /// /// 23
151200 1742N 06448W 0155 ///// 0148 +293 +225 360000 000 /// /// 23
151230 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +297 +224 360000 000 /// /// 23
151300 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +301 +223 360000 000 /// /// 23
151330 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +307 +224 360000 000 /// /// 23
151400 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +308 +224 360000 000 /// /// 23
151430 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +308 +225 360000 000 /// /// 23
151500 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +297 +226 360000 000 /// /// 23
151530 1742N 06448W 0151 ///// 0146 +297 +226 360000 000 /// /// 23
151600 1742N 06448W 0150 ///// 0145 +307 +228 360000 000 /// /// 23
151630 1742N 06448W 0149 ///// 0144 +318 +229 360000 000 /// /// 23
151700 1742N 06448W 0149 ///// 0144 +315 +230 360000 000 /// /// 23
151730 1742N 06448W 0147 ///// 0142 +307 +232 360000 000 /// /// 23
151800 1742N 06448W 0145 ///// 0140 +297 +233 360000 000 /// /// 23
151830 1742N 06448W 0141 ///// 0136 +292 +234 360000 000 /// /// 23
151900 1742N 06449W 0137 ///// 0132 +292 +235 360000 000 /// /// 23
151930 1742N 06449W 0128 ///// 0127 +309 +236 360000 000 /// /// 23
$$
;


We're off. I'm leaving soon so someone else will have to do it.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#1397 Postby HURAKAN » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:24 am

Image

Latest visible
0 likes   

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Re:

#1398 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:25 am

Welcome to storm2k where people's theories are challenged everyday as we try to unlock the mysteries of tropical meteorology :P :P :P

Weatherfreak000 wrote:
'CaneFreak wrote:I don't care how UNFAVORED of a track it is...the possibility is still very real that this gets trapped and heads back west...just sit back, relax, and watch it unfold... :P

Weatherfreak000 wrote:^^^
Guys please be careful discussing this solution. You don't want to mislead people when this solution is clearly not favored. Recurve is the favored solution by far.

Edit: CaneFreak have you BEEN here for the past few years?? :lol:


Storms come and go that challenge what "Should" happen at any point in a season. Ike being a strong example but inverse. Remember, Climatology is NOT a forecast.


That's FINE bro don't forget this whole thing got started cuz you CHALLENGE people, you insulted Gatorcane flat out, then you challenged me. It's like bro....your going to SERIOUSLY challenge people cuz u have a hunch? That's flat out unbecoming.

SO what i'm going to do, and plan on doing, is constantly harping on the recurve solution as I see fit.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 74
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#1399 Postby Dave » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:26 am

I can take it RL...let me know when.
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: Re:

#1400 Postby jinftl » Sun Jul 31, 2011 10:26 am

agree...we saw that with Don last week....the storm that went 'poof'. Not saying 91L will have the same fate...but I am saying that the unexpected is to be expected. This board is starting to remind me of the book Animal Farm...hopefully the NHC will come rescue us with an advisory and forecast/discussion before long!!!



Evil Jeremy wrote:
HurricaneWarning92 wrote:I believe hes just making an opinion to why he doesnt feel confident. Besides, if its for sure going to recurve then that must mean it gets stronger sooner than expected. or else it just goes towards the yucatan as a weak system, so at the end it didnt recurve either.


There are always more than two options. It's never "this or that". These are the tropics. Anything can happen.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest