ATL: EMILY - Remnants

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1741 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:32 pm

I am looking at the floater and superimposed the LAT/LON grid. Certainly seems like the BLOBS are heading nearly due W, maybe just a hair north of due W...
0 likes   

User avatar
Bobo2000
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:02 pm
Location: Ruston, LA

#1742 Postby Bobo2000 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:33 pm

0 likes   
_____________________
There can be only one Hypercane.....
:double:

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#1743 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:38 pm

The 18Z NAM clearly shows the well-advertised weakness at 66 hours from now. You can see the big break in the ridge between Florida and about 60W or just north of Puerto Rico and the cold front/trough on the top of the image with all of the barbs pointing ENE....a strong system should slide nicely into that break like the GFDL, ECMWF, and CMC are showing:

Image
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1744 Postby tailgater » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:39 pm

I don't think they will find a TD anywhere out this time around. to much low level flow.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
northtxboy
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 262
Age: 43
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 1:50 pm
Location: Windom Tx
Contact:

#1745 Postby northtxboy » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:40 pm

I have been reading and watching what you all say for awhile now. I dont really post to much cause 90% of the time I have no idea what you all are talking about and by the time I do my own research to find out its all changed and we are talking about something elese. I do alot of reading and alot of model watching just like all of you and most nights I am up till 2am just like most of you. I would like to share my thoughts with u all about 91L (emily). These are just my thoughts and I am not a pro met or do I have any kind of back ground like that. This is just my thoughts and I would like to know what everyone thinks of them. everyone keeps talking about this trough that will build off the east coast that will cause 91L to recurve to the east and miss the U.S east coast. For a time I was with u all on that. But now I am kinda stuck in the middle. The trough dips down pretty low down past florida and is very amplified at the begining but notice that the short wave to the north is lifting out before 91L can be affected meaning that the base of the trough is leaving,the jet is leaving meaning the piece of the trough that sags down past florida MIGHT NOT make the ride and is then left behind. Its a trough split and that would start moving to the west over florida and into the GOM. There is a real possabilty that 91L (emily) might try to follow this upper level low as the ridge builds to the north. I think and these are just my thoughts, I think florida has a big bullseye on it and should be closely watched over the next few days. I am not saying it will get hit but it sure looks close to me. :flag:
0 likes   

User avatar
stormchazer
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2461
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 12:00 pm
Location: Lakeland, Florida
Contact:

Re:

#1746 Postby stormchazer » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:40 pm

Bobo2000 wrote:Ok still swirling on the east.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-vis.html


Great look there. If you try to focus on lower level flows it does appear there are twin Lows but at what levels, who knows with out recon and no good surface observations. It will be interesting to see how the models hash out once, oh and if this develops. This is definitely a good "late-early season" development to watch. :D
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast and my opinion alone. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged

Opinions my own.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#1747 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:42 pm

stormchazer wrote:
Bobo2000 wrote:Ok still swirling on the east.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-vis.html


Great look there. If you try to focus on lower level flows it does appear there are twin Lows but at what levels, who knows with out recon and no good surface observations. It will be interesting to see how the models hash out once, oh and if this develops. This is definitely a good "late-early season" development to watch. :D


everyone should really be using RGB. the layers are different colors... highlighted so that its easier to discern what level the clouds are at. ITs just a better tool all around

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/loop-rgb.html
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
'CaneFreak
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
Location: New Bern, NC

Re:

#1748 Postby 'CaneFreak » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:43 pm

I strongly agree here...thanks for sharing your opinion...it also looks to me that the trough split will be short lived and the ridge will build back in...in addition, I think the delayed strengthening of the parent disturbance would also argue for a further west track. This will definitely need to be watched in the coming days.

northtxboy wrote:I have been reading and watching what you all say for awhile now. I dont really post to much cause 90% of the time I have no idea what you all are talking about and by the time I do my own research to find out its all changed and we are talking about something elese. I do alot of reading and alot of model watching just like all of you and most nights I am up till 2am just like most of you. I would like to share my thoughts with u all about 91L (emily). These are just my thoughts and I am not a pro met or do I have any kind of back ground like that. This is just my thoughts and I would like to know what everyone thinks of them. everyone keeps talking about this trough that will build off the east coast that will cause 91L to recurve to the east and miss the U.S east coast. For a time I was with u all on that. But now I am kinda stuck in the middle. The trough dips down pretty low down past florida and is very amplified at the begining but notice that the short wave to the north is lifting out before 91L can be affected meaning that the base of the trough is leaving,the jet is leaving meaning the piece of the trough that sags down past florida MIGHT NOT make the ride and is then left behind. Its a trough split and that would start moving to the west over florida and into the GOM. There is a real possabilty that 91L (emily) might try to follow this upper level low as the ridge builds to the north. I think and these are just my thoughts, I think florida has a big bullseye on it and should be closely watched over the next few days. I am not saying it will get hit but it sure looks close to me. :flag:
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1749 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:44 pm

and switches to infrared at night...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Rgv20
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2466
Age: 39
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 5:42 pm
Location: Edinburg/McAllen Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#1750 Postby Rgv20 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:45 pm

This is the forecast for 72hrs (Wednesday Morning) from the 12z runs GFS, ECMWF, and UKMET. Notice that the UKMET is weaker with the trough than both the GFS and Euro and thus is further west and faster than the other two models.

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

#1751 Postby TwisterFanatic » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:48 pm

First time looking at this today, I see two blobs, which one is looking the best to become the dominate one? West?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1752 Postby ozonepete » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:48 pm

Totally right, Aric. I use it most of the time, and it's especially useful for situations like this.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#1753 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:48 pm

gatorcane, yeah that weakness is very obvious as you say, it'll probably at least begin a WNW motion.

I still think it maybe a close call, I'm thinking some of the models are overdoing the weakness, to get that sort of weakness in very early august would be slightly unusual, though not unheard of.

As per normal, strength/position going to be key.

UKMO has a left bias FWIW, usually overdoes the ridging a little, in the same way as GFS overdoes troughing.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#1754 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:50 pm

KWT wrote:gatorcane, yeah that weakness is very obvious as you say, it'll probably at least begin a WNW motion.

I still think it maybe a close call, I'm thinking some of the models are overdoing the weakness, to get that sort of weakness in very early august would be slightly unusual, though not unheard of.

As per normal, strength/position going to be key.

UKMO has a left bias FWIW, usually overdoes the ridging a little, in the same way as GFS overdoes troughing.


but its not responding the weakness very much.. could be to far south .. and weak
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#1755 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:51 pm

And if you look at the 72 hour nam the ridge starts building back west and the gap is closing as the trough lifts out
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1756 Postby ROCK » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:51 pm

this thing is caught up in the low level flow....the east looks like the one to develope....but that dang west blob dosent look to shabby either....what a weird set up.....look at the low level convergence...

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=


Emily in 05 did the same thing almost....kept going west with the low level...
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re:

#1757 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:53 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:And if you look at the 72 hour nam the ridge starts building back west and the gap is closing as the trough lifts out


I do see that. Here is the 84 hour 18Z NAM. In fact the 12Z NAM was not showing the ridging build back like that:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29113
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#1758 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:53 pm

Am I seeing the MLC from the East portion starting to move over the now very obvious LLC on the SE side of the West system? I'm afraid to say what I am seeing as it seems to change from hour to hour if not minute to minute. :eek:
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#1759 Postby KWT » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:53 pm

gatorcane wrote:I am looking at the floater and superimposed the LAT/LON grid. Certainly seems like the BLOBS are heading nearly due W, maybe just a hair north of due W...


Looks to me to be somewhere between 275-280 degrees, not exactly gaining all that much latitude, think thats coming in 24-36hrs time when it gets into the Caribbean.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
hurricanefloyd5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1659
Age: 44
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:53 am
Location: Spartanburg
Contact:

Re:

#1760 Postby hurricanefloyd5 » Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:54 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:And if you look at the 72 hour nam the ridge starts building back west and the gap is closing as the trough lifts out



so what dose this mean aric?
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest