ATL: IRENE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11161
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#421 Postby Ivanhater » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:05 pm

Some where tracking the MLC and thinking it was headed north of west..now you can see the MLC taking over on the SW side heading west. Not there yet
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-vis.html
0 likes   
Michael

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#422 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:06 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Nothing at the surface yet

Image


Be careful with this version of ASCAT. It doesn't show which wind barbs are contaminated entries. And there are probably a LOT that are contaminated by heavy rain. Also, that image shows the circulation too far off to the south. I don't trust EUMETSATs version - it looks nicer than NOAA's, but I think it needs work.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#423 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:07 pm

KWT wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:The point is, I'm not getting carried away with the MLC yet. Not saying that is not where the LLC could set up though.


Yeah, I've seen even better looking MLC not have anything at the surface, Emily proved how badly we can be fooled by such features.

Still it does look like its trying to sdpin up something around that region.


the MLC is what eventually worked down with emily. there has to be convection for this to happen.. so only logical conclusion is to look where the convection is for a LLC.. same thing happened yesterday with harvey.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#424 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:07 pm

ozonepete wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:Nothing at the surface yet

[img]http://www.knmi.nl/scatterometer/oscat_50_prod/products/2011231_10084_10085_5.gif[/mg]


Be careful with this version of ASCAT. It doesn't show which wind barbs are contaminated entries. And there are probably a LOT that are contaminated by heavy rain. Also, that image shows the circulation too far off to the south. I don't trust EUMETSATs version - it looks nicer than NOAA's, but I think it needs work.


its also almost 7 hours old.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#425 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:09 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
ozonepete wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:Nothing at the surface yet

[img]http://www.knmi.nl/scatterometer/oscat_50_prod/products/2011231_10084_10085_5.gif[/mg]


Be careful with this version of ASCAT. It doesn't show which wind barbs are contaminated entries. And there are probably a LOT that are contaminated by heavy rain. Also, that image shows the circulation too far off to the south. I don't trust EUMETSATs version - it looks nicer than NOAA's, but I think it needs work.


its also almost 7 hours old.


Very good point
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#426 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:10 pm

Ivanhater wrote:Some where tracking the MLC and thinking it was headed north of west..now you can see the MLC taking over on the SW side heading west. Not there yet
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-vis.html


FWIW I can see a weak broad circulation at lower levels to the SE of the convection, it shows up nicely on the high resolution loops and thats what the Vort maps clocked onto as well to some extent.

Aric, it can work both ways, I've seen plenty of naked LLC's switch energy and the whole lot moves west...I saw that with Emily at 60W where the whole complex shifted westwards and reformed over the center of low level vort, remember that day clear as anything.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#427 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:12 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
KWT wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:The point is, I'm not getting carried away with the MLC yet. Not saying that is not where the LLC could set up though.


Yeah, I've seen even better looking MLC not have anything at the surface, Emily proved how badly we can be fooled by such features.

Still it does look like its trying to sdpin up something around that region.


the MLC is what eventually worked down with emily. there has to be convection for this to happen.. so only logical conclusion is to look where the convection is for a LLC.. same thing happened yesterday with harvey.


I have seen Aric pick the LLC way better than the models or most of us have and he's done it at least 3 times so far this season. His logic is sound. The NHC was surprised where the center of HArvey was this morning but Aric wasn't. I'm not trying to throw kudos around - I'm just saying he makes good points. His logic for this system seems really correct to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#428 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:17 pm

Good loop here to track the system, though note it will lose Vis imagery very soon:

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... color=gray

Can clearly see nothing with regards to westerlies...also there is turning quite far south of the convection between 12-13N and 48-52W, close to where the vort estimate was made earlier.

Also note the strong easterlies going into the MLC as well, as I said tends to suggest at least something is getting going up there.

I think we have a broad weak turning south of the MLC with probably a more stronger circulation starting to set up in the MLC.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#429 Postby Aric Dunn » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:21 pm

KWT wrote:Good loop here to track the system, though note it will lose Vis imagery very soon:

http://wwwghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ge ... color=gray

Can clearly see nothing with regards to westerlies...also there is turning quite far south of the convection between 12-13N and 48-52W, close to where the vort estimate was made earlier.

Also note the strong easterlies going into the MLC as well, as I said tends to suggest at least something is getting going up there.

I think we have a broad weak turning south of the MLC with probably a more stronger circulation starting to set up in the MLC.


the area to the south is a "kink" ( for lack of a better term) in the old itcz that is getting drawn up on the east side of the large circ with 97L giving the appearance something is there..

Image
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#430 Postby Macrocane » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:50 pm

97L has become better organized since this morning, I have no doubt about it: the outflow is much better, there's a better mid level circulation and some bands have developed, the only thing that looks a little worse is the convection as it has been weakening this afternoon but may be part of the diurnal cycles.
0 likes   

Adoquín
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#431 Postby Adoquín » Fri Aug 19, 2011 5:55 pm

KWT wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:
yeah it is ... plenty of evidence showing the beginnings of a more defined low level feature. still not defined enough but compared to this morning its way way closer..


If it is the LLC then the ECM looks spot on with the track and with it...Hello Hispaniola and with it weakening...hopefully the ECM is correct because it reduces the threat of a major in a HUGE way...

Should be code red one way or the other.


provided other assumptions in the model pan out of course, and no quick strenghtening. otherwise it is a new ball game
0 likes   

User avatar
Gustywind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 12334
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 7:29 am
Location: Baie-Mahault, GUADELOUPE

#432 Postby Gustywind » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:00 pm

97L
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
weatherwindow
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 904
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
Location: key west/ft lauderdale

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#433 Postby weatherwindow » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:02 pm

nws miami and key west have terminated marine forecasts wednesday 8/23...marine forecasts nearshore and offshore normally cover the next seven days...my contacts with the nws office in key west before and during georges informed me that these forecasts are held pending coordination with nhc to insure accurate storm-focused marine products....this tells me that the nws and nhc consider this a credible threat to the respective cwas.....rich
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#434 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:06 pm

Adoquín wrote:
provided other assumptions in the model pan out of course, and no quick strenghtening. otherwise it is a new ball game


Yep very true, not sure there'd be a whole lot of difference with the track though, may just mean the Bahamas would be at higher risk then they were yesterday...

NHC should go with 60%, they could go higher but no major sign of a LLC yet. Recon should be a go tomorrow...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Cryomaniac
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1289
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: Newark, Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Re:

#435 Postby Cryomaniac » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:09 pm

Gustywind wrote:97L
Image



The following is entirely the opinion of Cryomaniac, and is based on no evidence, meteorological or otherwise. As such it shouldn't be used for any purpose

To my (very) untrained eye, 97L seems to be getting "the look". I'd be surprised if it didn't develop at all. Not so sure I buy some of the earlier "doom cane" scenarios though.
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#436 Postby MGC » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:09 pm

Organization of 97L has increased this afternoon with considerable convective incease noted. MLC is quite pronounce on the satellite loop. Not quite sure how long it will take for the circulation to bore to the surface. I'm thinking the odds are excellent for a TD to form before 97L enters the Caribbean Sea. Only thing holding 97L back is the dry air surrounding it. Getting concerned that this will be a GOM threat.....MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#437 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:27 pm

If the MLC keeps that presentation I can't imagine it'll take long for it to develop a lower level circulation...could be a TD in the next 24hrs if current trends continue.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#438 Postby ROCK » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:28 pm

nothing at the surface....convection is decreasing however cloud structure looks good....
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#439 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:29 pm

Hopefully people don't think that if it decides to move into the carib that it's going to automatically be disruppted by mountainous terrain on the islands. There's also a very good chance that it might move over the flatter part of Cuba, or perhaps even go through the channel allowing it not to weaken at all.... There's just as good of a chance of that happening....
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#440 Postby KWT » Fri Aug 19, 2011 6:32 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Hopefully people don't think that if it decides to move into the carib that it's going to automatically be disruppted by mountainous terrain on the islands. There's also a very good chance that it might move over the flatter part of Cuba, or perhaps even go through the channel allowing it not to weaken at all.... There's just as good of a chance of that happening....


If it heads over Hispaniola it will get weakened at least a little...

howver the conditions aloft are good and I certainly wouldn't bank on much weakening, though its hard to ignore Hispaniola's track record!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests